It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kashai
Hypothetically speaking Russia and China launch a preemptive nuclear strike, against the United States. The US destroys every ICBM headed towards the US. Once that is done, the US responds by launching a retaliatory strike, effectively turning China and Russian into a parking lot. Eurasia, Africa and Australia no longer have humans living on them and all life on Antarctica has been wiped out. What happens next is a Nuclear winter that lasts about a 1000 years.
Nothing that allows for human survival exist, in the form of food exists.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by RevRay
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
First thing first. No one wins thermal nuke war.
Who would be in the advantage spot for survival? No one.
The World could not survive an exchange.
So all in the game know this and don't see this.
Especially Red China with an acceptable loss in the hundreds of millions and ours is only 10-12 million to wipe us out.
10 MIRVS on one Ballistic with 10 separate tarkets with 36 in tubes times how many Tridents we have and where are they?
Man your definitly gonna have to bend real hard to kiss your arse goodbye.
Originally posted by Kashai
Hypothetically speaking Russia and China launch a preemptive nuclear strike, against the United States. The US destroys every ICBM headed towards the US. Once that is done, the US responds by launching a retaliatory strike, effectively turning China and Russian into a parking lot. Eurasia, Africa and Australia no longer have humans living on them and all life on Antarctica has been wiped out. What happens next is a Nuclear winter that lasts about a 1000 years.
Nothing that allows for human survival exist, in the form of food exists.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by yuppa
Originally posted by Kashai
Hypothetically speaking Russia and China launch a preemptive nuclear strike, against the United States. The US destroys every ICBM headed towards the US. Once that is done, the US responds by launching a retaliatory strike, effectively turning China and Russian into a parking lot. Eurasia, Africa and Australia no longer have humans living on them and all life on Antarctica has been wiped out. What happens next is a Nuclear winter that lasts about a 1000 years.
Nothing that allows for human survival exist, in the form of food exists.
Any thoughts?
Heres a thought. What if the US does NOT fire back with nukes because we destroyed them all? If we destroyed their capability to hit us its redundant to hit them with nukes,when conventional warfare would work after that? MAD is not a absolute.
Originally posted by Kashai
Launching and detonating as many as several hundred tactical nukes, in our upper atmosphere. Would make being outdoors a problem for quite some time due to damage to the ozone layer.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by Kashai
Launching and detonating as many as several hundred tactical nukes, in our upper atmosphere. Would make being outdoors a problem for quite some time due to damage to the ozone layer.
Any thoughts?
Yes, why would we use several hundred when 2-3 would destroy them?
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by Kashai
Launching and detonating as many as several hundred tactical nukes, in our upper atmosphere. Would make being outdoors a problem for quite some time due to damage to the ozone layer.
Any thoughts?
Yes, why would we use several hundred when 2-3 would destroy them?
huh??
The Tsar Bomb or AN602 was supposedly the largest nuke tested. It was built and detonated by the Russians... and was one of the cleanest nuclear bombs tested.
I realize they make them bigger than this but people well within a hundred miles of this bomb would certainly survive unscathed.
2 or 3 nukes in no way shape or form would destroy China.
Now if we are talking very dirty nukes, then releasing them in the upper atmosphere could cause mucho trouble for a lot of people... but that would include everyone around the globe because that is how air currents operate, which would be very dumb of them.
but 2-3 nukes DESTROY them?
You *were* talking about China, correct? maybe i misunderstood... I HOPE I misunderstood.
Maybe you are talking about a large city or something... or a tiny state.
Hell, if you SEE a nuke go off and actually see the freaking cloud go up, as long as you do not get hit by the thermal blast and if you do not panic and go in the wrong direction, there is a very good chance you could survive it... unless they closed all roads near you... and then you would STILL have a good chance of surviving it as long as you knew which direction the wind was blowing and put it in your mind to not stick around and wait.edit on 25-1-2013 by NotAnAspie because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by Kashai
Launching and detonating as many as several hundred tactical nukes, in our upper atmosphere. Would make being outdoors a problem for quite some time due to damage to the ozone layer.
Any thoughts?
Yes, why would we use several hundred when 2-3 would destroy them?
huh??
The Tsar Bomb or AN602 was supposedly the largest nuke tested. It was built and detonated by the Russians... and was one of the cleanest nuclear bombs tested.
I realize they make them bigger than this but people well within a hundred miles of this bomb would certainly survive unscathed.
2 or 3 nukes in no way shape or form would destroy China.
Now if we are talking very dirty nukes, then releasing them in the upper atmosphere could cause mucho trouble for a lot of people... but that would include everyone around the globe because that is how air currents operate, which would be very dumb of them.
but 2-3 nukes DESTROY them?
You *were* talking about China, correct? maybe i misunderstood... I HOPE I misunderstood.
Maybe you are talking about a large city or something... or a tiny state.
Hell, if you SEE a nuke go off and actually see the freaking cloud go up, as long as you do not get hit by the thermal blast and if you do not panic and go in the wrong direction, there is a very good chance you could survive it... unless they closed all roads near you... and then you would STILL have a good chance of surviving it as long as you knew which direction the wind was blowing and put it in your mind to not stick around and wait.edit on 25-1-2013 by NotAnAspie because: (no reason given)
Maybe you simply are unable to grasp what 3 bombs killing 60 million people and turning 3 of their greatest cities to glass will do. The war will be over, they will surrender, their will destroyed.
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Maybe you simply are unable to grasp what 3 bombs killing 60 million people and turning 3 of their greatest cities to glass will do. The war will be over, they will surrender, their will destroyed.
A) This isn't the 40s. People aren't going to think God came back just because a nuke goes off. scared, sure... but much more prepared... especially if your whole government is built on Anti-imperialism after seeing what DID happen in the 40s. After the shockwave, those people would simply be PISSED and coming for western blood come hell or high water.
B) They are aware of our nukes and would not likely surrender because the government has taken control of a lot of underground locations and built even more and they would TOTALLY be expecting this if they engaged in war with us.
C) Japan has a tendency to be one of the most densely populated areas in the world, so killing a lot of people there can be done in a smaller location... China is much different and in the age of automobiles everywhere in big cities many more could survive a nuclear attack for multiple reasons... transportation and simply being able to identify it, not to mention personal protective equipment that their forces would likely be prepared with in light of an oncoming war
D) We've had Russian subs sneaking around in US waters lately... according to rumors that I have multiple reasons believe but the government simply won't confirm it... and our government does not want to GO THERE... if it's smart. BRICS could retaliate and decimate us faster than we could them. They have the majority of the landmass by far and MANY more places to hide.
E) Japan already had plans to surrender. So you worship the big bad bomb and think it's God. Not everyone does.
I can GRASP quite a bit. And what I GRASP is that you must be a really big fan of fiction.
In Hiroshima and Nagasaki there might have been 250,000 killed by the bombs both immediately and lingering effects in the following year.
Tragic? YES... and They should still be complaining about it, but a strong tidal wave on the east coast from la palma is likely to kill many more people than that and it's doubtful that WE would surrender to anyone who caused it to happen.
I have no idea where you are getting this 66 million scenario from... perhaps a video game or something but until you can show me where this has occurred you're just blowing smoke.
A death toll like that is unlikely to happen in China.
That kind of death toll wouldn't even be possible in New York City with 3 bombs.
ou talking really big fish there, dude. Keep dreaming.
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
Let me give you yet another perspective... China's most populated city has over 23 million... yet the city covers almost 2500 sq miles.
Do you realize how many bombs it would take to wipe out that city? they would probably not be able to destroy just that one city with 3 bombs if they used B53s... which is supposed to be the largest US bomb, but since it's never been tested, it's radius is only a projection.... causing lethal burns to unprotected people within a 18 mile radius and collapsing building at a 10 mile radius.
And while 3 B53s might be enough to consider that city destroyed, it would not kill everyone and that is 23 million... not 60 million. HOWEVER, the last B53 was supposed to have been dismantled in Texas on 2011.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by Taikun
Another Gulf of Tonkin incident waiting to occur? I will not rule out a false flag from the Chinese this time around, for a full scale military grab for the islands. U.S. will join Japan, where Russia will back China. A world war in the making.
China would not start a war any time soon. My belief is that they are trying to intimidate the other Pacific nations. The US would back Japan with the full might of our military, and China would be in ruins within weeks. Russia would never back China, and if they did they too would be annihilated, it would take most likely a few months for both nations to surrender, with almost no US casualties. Both countries combined could not dent the US Navy, they would be blockaded, bombed, and become withering hulks. They would be forced to repay huge reparations, and would be a huge coup for the US and the US economy.
Never happen.