James Cameron's BURIED PRODUCTION "Resurrection Tomb" (regards Jesus's Bone Box found). Discover, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 07:37 PM by NOTurTypical
reply to post by vethumanbeing



The tomb "find" is what was debunked, not the production or cinematography in making the documentary. I don't think anyone is saying the documentary is bogus, but the tomb find itself.


reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 07:46 PM by NOTurTypical
reply to post by vethumanbeing



You seem to be rather uninformed on the topic. And who knows, you could be quite new to ATS as well. Anyways, we all did this discussion in 2007. Most of the experts that were interviewed for the TV episode that aired came forward and stated that their testimonies were manipulated and they unanimously repudiated the show and it's producers.

Google isn't something to fear friend.

In both the film and book, a series of experts on archaeology, epigraphy, ancient names, DNA, statistics, and esoteric texts are interviewed. They are not told about the overarching thesis, but each is asked about a single component of the puzzle, which the producers skillfully edit into a compelling story. Confidentiality agreements must be signed for the sake of secrecy, jettisoning peer review, the gold standard of academic integrity. Only the principals involved had the whole picture, and scholars are made marionette-like to play their parts. But last week, after a press conference announced the "discovery," those scholars began to come forward, one by one, questioning or even repudiating the way their words or intentions had been manipulated.

Almost to a person, my colleagues in archaeology and biblical scholarship are condemning the thesis as fraudulent. Why? The case is simply not compelling, And in spite of The Lost Tomb of Jesus's insistence that the secret was buried and forgotten in the Israel Antiquity's Authority's storage facilities since 1980, just like Indiana Jones' ark, this is patently not true. Many scholars, including myself, had written about those names on the ossuaries years ago and concluded that that the discovery was indeed very important evidence about Jewish burial practices at the time of Jesus, but highly unlikely to be Jesus of Nazareth's burial.


here



reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 08:02 PM by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to
post by vethumanbeing



You seem to be rather uninformed on the topic. And who knows, you could be quite new to ATS as well. Anyways, we all did this discussion in 2007. Most of the experts that were interviewed for the TV episode that aired came forward and stated that their testimonies were manipulated and they unanimously repudiated the show and it's producers.

Google isn't something to fear friend.

In both the film and book, a series of experts on archaeology, epigraphy, ancient names, DNA, statistics, and esoteric texts are interviewed. They are not told about the overarching thesis, but each is asked about a single component of the puzzle, which the producers skillfully edit into a compelling story. Confidentiality agreements must be signed for the sake of secrecy, jettisoning peer review, the gold standard of academic integrity. Only the principals involved had the whole picture, and scholars are made marionette-like to play their parts. But last week, after a press conference announced the "discovery," those scholars began to come forward, one by one, questioning or even repudiating the way their words or intentions had been manipulated.

Almost to a person, my colleagues in archaeology and biblical scholarship are condemning the thesis as fraudulent. Why? The case is simply not compelling, And in spite of The Lost Tomb of Jesus's insistence that the secret was buried and forgotten in the Israel Antiquity's Authority's storage facilities since 1980, just like Indiana Jones' ark, this is patently not true. Many scholars, including myself, had written about those names on the ossuaries years ago and concluded that that the discovery was indeed very important evidence about Jewish burial practices at the time of Jesus, but highly unlikely to be Jesus of Nazareth's burial.


here



Elequantly said, I am a neophyte. Never human before.
And your answer is? Not True. As in Noahs ark not there found in Turkey.
Next Question.
Mermaid Found. Documentary NOAA. Discovery channel .Debunk it.


reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 08:13 PM by NOTurTypical
reply to post by vethumanbeing



I hope you'll understand and forgive me for refraining to engage a red herring.


reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 11:10 PM by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to
post by vethumanbeing



You seem to be rather uninformed on the topic. And who knows, you could be quite new to ATS as well. Anyways, we all did this discussion in 2007. Most of the experts that were interviewed for the TV episode that aired came forward and stated that their testimonies were manipulated and they unanimously repudiated the show and it's producers.

Google isn't something to fear friend.

In both the film and book, a series of experts on archaeology, epigraphy, ancient names, DNA, statistics, and esoteric texts are interviewed. They are not told about the overarching thesis, but each is asked about a single component of the puzzle, which the producers skillfully edit into a compelling story. Confidentiality agreements must be signed for the sake of secrecy, jettisoning peer review, the gold standard of academic integrity. Only the principals involved had the whole picture, and scholars are made marionette-like to play their parts. But last week, after a press conference announced the "discovery," those scholars began to come forward, one by one, questioning or even repudiating the way their words or intentions had been manipulated.

Almost to a person, my colleagues in archaeology and biblical scholarship are condemning the thesis as fraudulent. Why? The case is simply not compelling, And in spite of The Lost Tomb of Jesus's insistence that the secret was buried and forgotten in the Israel Antiquity's Authority's storage facilities since 1980, just like Indiana Jones' ark, this is patently not true. Many scholars, including myself, had written about those names on the ossuaries years ago and concluded that that the discovery was indeed very important evidence about Jewish burial practices at the time of Jesus, but highly unlikely to be Jesus of Nazareth's burial.


here



Elequantly said, I am a neophyte. Never human before.
And your answer is? Not True. As in Noahs ark not there found in Turkey.
Next Question.
Mermaid Found. Documentary NOAA. Discovery channel .Debunk it.


very sad if true and if so the point of the lie? or simply a question posited to make ourselves think beyond outside the the box all of this is unsettling as I am shown something that I must understand yet in truth thereof cannot make any sense of it at all. I am a first time human no karma and searching.
edit on 13-1-2013 by vethumanbeing because: 20 points lost and have no idea why



reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 11:16 PM by NOTurTypical
reply to post by vethumanbeing



Simple.. people who are not Christians trying to disprove the resurrection of the Son of God.


reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 11:20 PM by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to
post by vethumanbeing



I hope you'll understand and forgive me for refraining to engage a red herring.


Why is a red herring a bad thing? It is the obvious answer to any age old question disquised as truth, hiding; something falsehoodian. Dickens, Austintonian.. Name in the blank.
edit on 13-1-2013 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 11:28 PM by NOTurTypical
reply to post by vethumanbeing



I don't mean this in a bad way, have you taken logic courses? One should never entertain a red herring rebuttal.


reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 11:29 PM by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to
post by vethumanbeing



Simple.. people who are not Christians trying to disprove the resurrection of the Son of God.


No calibrate. No idea. You cannot disprove something you have no imagination of; as in what if that happenend for real and true- if no majick, it did not, if so it did and the mystery schools tell the story.


reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 11:44 PM by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to
post by vethumanbeing



The tomb "find" is what was debunked, not the production or cinematography in making the documentary. I don't think anyone is saying the documentary is bogus, but the tomb find itself.


Who debunked it? The tomb ITSELF? Was the Tomb the ultimate Naysayer? (what is that camera doing here) and is this a documentary? all jokes aside?



reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 11:49 PM by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to
post by vethumanbeing



I don't mean this in a bad way, have you taken logic courses? One should never entertain a red herring rebuttal.


Odd you should ask that, IAM a more of a statistics personality; so should explain the Red Herring.


reply posted on 16-1-2013 @ 11:37 PM by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by NOTurTypical





Do a simple search, this has been discussed a few times on here. There is tons of info on the net you can find that completely debunks the "find". That's why the documentary was scrubbed, it was poor scholarship and archaeology.


Wherever the carcass is, there the eagles will be gathered. I think this applies to that bit of scripture. He's not in the desert, he's not in someone's basement, and he ain't in a dusty old tomb.

Matt. 24:23-28

23 “Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There!’ do not believe it. 24 For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you beforehand.

26 “Therefore if they say to you, ‘Look, He is in the desert!’ do not go out; or ‘Look, He is in the inner rooms!’ do not believe it. 27 For as the lightning comes from the east and flashes to the west, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. 28 For wherever the carcass is, there the eagles will be gathered together.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Belief in God/Jesus through Personal experiences.
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
What was God doing before "In the beginning"?
  Posted 14 days ago with 9 member flags
Stay Out Of HELL.
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
Do Christians really want to Start World War 3?
  Posted 3 days ago with 9 member flags
My Hopeful Reintroduction to God
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags