James Cameron's BURIED PRODUCTION "Resurrection Tomb" (regards Jesus's Bone Box found). Discover

THE producer/director of screen epics: 'Avitar' 'Titanic' (and others) spends a gazillion to send a camera crew and cameras into (bore) the Tomb of Joseph of (correct me here) Aramathiea's family resting place 'between the two hills' Jeruselem underneath a modern day apartment complex. The Tin merchant. After Jeshua Ben Josephs stint at Qumran age 13, ad some years then spent the next 20 or so years traveling such places as the British Isles, India with this other father of sorts. Buried there with Josephs family, Bone Box Identified in 3 languages- Greek, Aramic and Hebrew SON OF GOD ARISES. What happened? The Orthodox constabulatory stepped in and shut it down as a heresy against/regarding the disturbance of a resting body/bones/tomb site. This happened in 2008.

reply to post by vethumanbeing


Links and sources please.
Second.

reply to post by vethumanbeing


I think you're confusing this with the T.V. show called The Lost Tomb of Jesus. It was produced by James Cameron and aired on Discovery channel back in 2007.

Originally posted by DelayedChristmas
reply to post by vethumanbeing

 

Links and sources please.
Second.

Discovery.com. The Channel Discovery. It aired one time never again; although I DVR'ed it because it was scheduled to air two more times that week wanted to get it recorded. Never Happened again.

Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by vethumanbeing

 

I think you're confusing this with the T.V. show called The Lost Tomb of Jesus. It was produced by James Cameron and aired on Discovery channel back in 2007.

No. Wrong. Not a T.V. Show-this was a full blown documentary-not make believe and or scripted.

reply to post by vethumanbeing


That's what I meant.

That paragraph made my head hurt, and I think I may need to go to a hospital.

But Flagged anyway to see if anyone has actual sourced info on this or can find the show itself somewhere.

reply to post by vethumanbeing


If you recorded it, you can upload it.

No?

Originally posted by CalibratedZeus
That paragraph made my head hurt, and I think I may need to go to a hospital.

But Flagged anyway to see if anyone has actual sourced info on this or can find the show itself somewhere.

I know what I watched and there were witnesses with me viewing this TV event of seeing a truth finally regarding the story of how and where those bones are as in final resting place. The symbols upon the 'bone box' size approx. 2x5 feet length and width were of a fish, and an acronym that describes a temple as a triangle also as stated in language as to whom these remains belonged to. Reason for query? AVAILABLE BRILLIANT BEINGS TO SOLVE THIS ARE HERE.

Originally posted by AdamOver
reply to post by vethumanbeing

 

If you recorded it, you can upload it.

No?

THIS IS THE PROBLEM FIRST/INITIAL VIEWING NOT RECORDED AS i thought i'd have a second or third chance at seeing this again and groking it: the idea of pulling it apart logically and reasonably.

Those boxes were proven to be hoaxes.

Originally posted by Obsrvr
Those boxes were proven to be hoaxes.

Before anyone can second guess this-Think visionary (of the hollywood type). Cameron perfect in trying to find himself; self described to find the ultimate illumination.
Additional Information? Any? Hoaxes? Walt Disney swept in and countermanded Cameron with an army of Dwarves, Sleeping Beauties and Snow Whites? Prove it. You are a paid Debunker? and if not that-- a Fearfull Human. Prove it by whom and how and I require names; you can not say anything to me without backing it up with evidence of some sort. So As a BREATH OF NOT FRESH AIR I do not breathe you in.

reply to post by vethumanbeing


Do a simple search, this has been discussed a few times on here. There is tons of info on the net you can find that completely debunks the "find". That's why the documentary was scrubbed, it was poor scholarship and archaeology. If it had been a worthwhile find it would certainly have been broadcast.

The film was rather professionally made. (With James Cameron, who produced Titanic, as the executive producer, it’s no wonder!) That is not to say that it accurately portrayed the facts of the case, but rather that it was slick and a good piece of propaganda. The interview that Koppel conducted only scratched the surface of the problems involved. I thought Koppel did a very commendable job of digging for the facts. William Dever, a renowned archeologist who is not a Christian, said that James Cameron’s “The Lost Tomb of Jesus” gave archeologists a bad name. Jonathan Reed, another archeologist on the panel discussion, said that film was “archeo-porn.”

link

reply to post by vethumanbeing

Spare me the corn. Use a search engine. Exercise your walnut.

Originally posted by vethumanbeing

Originally posted by Obsrvr
Those boxes were proven to be hoaxes.

Additional Information? Any? Hoaxes? Walt Disney swept in and countermanded Cameron with an army of Dwarves, Sleeping Beauties and Snow Whites? Prove it. You are a paid Debunker? and if not that-- a Fearfull Human. Prove it by whom and how and I require names; you can not say anything to me without backing it up with evidence of some sort. So As a BREATH OF NOT FRESH AIR I do not breathe you in.

edit on 13-1-2013 by vethumanbeing because: Really?

Google "Lost Tomb of Jesus hoax".

Hope you have a ton of free time, you'll be reading for weeks.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by vethumanbeing

Originally posted by Obsrvr
Those boxes were proven to be hoaxes.

Additional Information? Any? Hoaxes? Walt Disney swept in and countermanded Cameron with an army of Dwarves, Sleeping Beauties and Snow Whites? Prove it. You are a paid Debunker? and if not that-- a Fearfull Human. Prove it by whom and how and I require names; you can not say anything to me without backing it up with evidence of some sort. So As a BREATH OF NOT FRESH AIR I do not breathe you in.

edit on 13-1-2013 by vethumanbeing because: Really?

Google "Lost Tomb of Jesus hoax".

Hope you have a ton of free time, you'll be reading for weeks.

So, You are saying based upon scholarship you have investigated yourself you are confident in your findings. Ton or tome of free time? You have not provided a sintile of evidence otherwise. PROVE IT (why do you believe that Google is the end al'be all? I did not think this would have been so fast/so quick). A Brainwashatarian Google drone.

Originally posted by vethumanbeing

So, You are saying based upon scholarship you have investigated yourself you are confident in your findings. Ton or tome of free time? You have not provided a sintile of evidence otherwise. PROVE IT (why do you believe that Google is the end al'be all? I did not think this would have been so fast/so quick). A Brainwashatarian Google drone.

Collect yourself, good man.
Your desperation is showing.

Originally posted by Obsrvr
reply to post by vethumanbeing

 

Spare me the corn. Use a search engine. Exercise your walnut.

Need not have to as in you do. Walnut. Quaint. Your brilliance comparing yourself to a NUT as in that is your personal reference what nut family? walnut, pecan, cashew, almond? Search engine? you have to relegate desigate to a higher power called an engine housed in an accordian playing tripartate.

reply to post by vethumanbeing

Get off your duff and do your research. We're not here to hold your hand. You were given a lead. Follow it.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by vethumanbeing

 

Do a simple search, this has been discussed a few times on here. There is tons of info on the net you can find that completely debunks the "find". That's why the documentary was scrubbed, it was poor scholarship and archaeology. If it had been a worthwhile find it would certainly have been broadcast.

The film was rather professionally made. (With James Cameron, who produced Titanic, as the executive producer, it’s no wonder!) That is not to say that it accurately portrayed the facts of the case, but rather that it was slick and a good piece of propaganda. The interview that Koppel conducted only scratched the surface of the problems involved. I thought Koppel did a very commendable job of digging for the facts. William Dever, a renowned archeologist who is not a Christian, said that James Cameron’s “The Lost Tomb of Jesus” gave archeologists a bad name. Jonathan Reed, another archeologist on the panel discussion, said that film was “archeo-porn.”

link

edit on 13-1-2013 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)

We are describing a totally different iconology. One was called "The Lost Tomb of Jesus" the other that I am asking about is called "Resurrection TOMB". Come on. Can we at least figure out nomanclature as to what what was what and if the page is correct?