Video Topless Vatican Protesters: In Gay We Trust Protesting Popes speech against gay marriage

Originally posted by Thurisaz

Originally posted by wingsfan
Bunch of degenerate femanazis who don't even realize they are just the end result of decades worth of brainwashing from our enemies. I would of beat the hell out of them disrespectful whores, just like they did in France last year when this group tried the same crap.

Your the sinner.

shame on you.
Disrepectful whores??? sheesh

While you keep worshipping a Pedo organisation and degrade eveyone else.

typical oh go and rape some kids and then say 10 hail marys... or something like that and then go and sit in church like your ever so good.

Sorry should of been more specific in my first post. Firstly I meant attention whores, because that is all this group is. They do this exact thing over, and over, and over, and over. It has never led to anything aside from more attention.

And that's why I'm mad about it, look into these women, they are femanazis. They have no interest in any kind of "rights" so to speak, just being degenerate to draw attention.

Lastly, I'm not of any religious ideal, I just wonder what the point is of a mostly European rights group always going after the Christian church in regards to gay rights, meanwhile muslims in Europe make no bones about how they feel about women across the board.

When Pussy Riot got arrested it was presented as some total attack on their rights and everyone got upset. Nobody bothered to look into them aside from that incident. They were doing stuff like that repeatedly, and they were certainly not strangers with femen. They had people posing in full blown sexual situations in churches, now if you like religion or not, you have to respect the idea that those people would eventually get tired of such blatant disrespect.

There is groups of said ideals that have class and clout at least, these people do not.

Originally posted by Pinke
Nothing not natural about any of that.

A gay catholic priest adopting kids from an orphanage
is 'natural' to you,
but it NOT a HEALTHY norm by any standards what so
ever ! END OF DISCUSSION .

_______________________

Originally posted by ToneDeaf
A gay catholic priest adopting kids from an orphanage
is 'natural' to you,
but it NOT a HEALTHY norm by any standards what so
ever ! END OF DISCUSSION .

Certainly wasn't claiming that nope.

Should have cut that sentence off your quote, frankly. I don't believe single people should be adopting generally. Children need a support network;preferably more than two people. If you've read any of my posts on this topic around ATS it would be pretty obvious I believe that and that I'm not at all implying that a single person should be allowed to adopt a child for their creepy porn dungeon or something.

If someone is gay and Christian or Catholic or whatever, I certainly don't believe an adoption system should focus overly on their belief system unless it's a strong danger to the child.

Your example certainly doesn't reflect reality, and therefore I didn't feel the need particularly to address it. Sorry for the misunderstanding, but you're also being rude. I certainly wouldn't endorse pedophilic relationships and to imply I would and say 'end of discussion' is extremely offensive.

Danke.

Originally posted by Pinke. I don't believe single people should be adopting

So would it be better for two gay catholic priests
to adopt ?
Would that be mentally healthy ?
. . . changing the laws would not make it normal.
____________________

Originally posted by ToneDeaf
So would it be better for two gay catholic priests
to adopt ?
Would that be mentally healthy ?

. . . changing the laws would not make it normal.
____________________

You're presenting a deliberately loaded question.

It would be similarish to me asking you ... would you let a gay couple with a wide support network and no criminal record adopt if the children were otherwise going to be adopted by two known sex offenders into a cult. It's an example which isn't based on reality.

It's especially silly when you clearly mean 'two gay Catholic priests' to actually mean two pedophiles. Anyone can ask these sorts of questions to draw attention away from reality.

I don't mean to write your argument for you ... but a better argument would be, 'what would stop two people claiming to be gay and then adopting a child for other purposes?' The answer would be; the same thing which would stop a heterosexual couple in a cult doing the same thing!

When a person adopts a child there's a bit more red tape, checks and balances than when a person just conceives.

Originally posted by CincinnatiReds
ehhhhhh nasty chick with hair armpits......gross!

... Virgin?

Originally posted by wingsfan
Bunch of degenerate femanazis who don't even realize they are just the end result of decades worth of brainwashing from our enemies.

Okay you have an opinion on how we got here... and then...

I would of beat the hell out of them disrespectful whores, just like they did in France last year when this group tried the same crap.

Yup, I can see absolutely no reason at all why feminism wouldn't seek to change the lives of women to escape this kind of Neanderthal knuckle dragging thinking, none at all. In fact, why wouldnt a woman want to get beaten for expressing her political beliefs? Why wouldn't she want to be called a whore because she is simply "exposing" herself in public?

You, sir, are an idiot.

Here's how I see it...

How does being topless protest what a Pope says about gay marriage? Wouldn't it be more appropriate for gay couples that're properly dressed to protest with signs? People would then look at the signs rather than the boobs. It's the message that's important. They're missing the message.

As for whether woman should be able to be topless in public, I think it depends on the person. If you're not sexually attracted to breasts and they don't make you feel uncomfortable then you'll be all for it. For example, I'm a guy and I see nothing wrong with a buff man in briefs. I'm not sexually attracted to it and it doesn't make me uncomfortable. It's like seeing anything else that doesn't grab my attention. However, if i was attracted to a buff man in briefs then it might grab my attention and thus either cause me to stare or to be embarrassed or something similar. Similarly, while I am attracted to breasts, I'd say that a fair number of them are "normal" looking and not as attractive to me. In those cases, it doesn't bother me as much and I could probably be ok with that. It's only when hte breasts start to look good that it causes me discomfort, since it's too sexual in nature. Just like I'd feel uncomfortable if somebody was peeing in public, but for a different reason. It grabs my attention because they should pee in the proper places and have some manners around others. However, if I was a dog, I'd probably see nothing wrong with it, since dogs do that routinely.

I'll admit that any good looking female can grab attention whether she's dressed or not, so to some extent my argument is deficient. However, there's a limit to what people will accept. You can't push that limit too far. For example, if a woman dresses too slutty and shows up at work that way, the employer understands that she'll likely interrupt the other employees from doing their work at a decent clip. Thus, the employer will walk up to her and tell her to go home and get into some less sleazy clothing, since he thinks it would cause too much hassle. I think this is reasonable. However, if you're not a person that's attracted to woman in this way then you might not understand me. You may say "Woman should be able to dress in whatever they want!" It may be easy for you to say, but as a guy and I can tell you without hesitation that a woman dressed in provocative clothing would -not- be something I'd want to see at work and it'd make it a lot harder for me to work effectively.

Let me put it this way... Lets say there's a woman causing a "display" on the highway. She's essentially stripping and putting on a show for the passing cars. Now lets say that someone calls the police and says "I almost got in an accident because of a lady stripping on the side of the highway. I think it's not safe for her to be where she's at. There're already too many accidents on a normal day. And you never know what kind of deviant pervert will see her and pick her up and rape her. So just warning you about it. She's etc etc etc." Freedom is a responsibility, you get me?

And what about all the religious prudents that will not like it?

We don't live in a world where everybody is the same. And we don't live in a world where every action always has the same results. We live in a very complicated world with many different results. This is why when we craft common laws we have to cooperate together to ensure agreement. This means we won't agree on everything and we'll have to cut that out. For example, it's not normally legal for a person to be naked in public. However, in certain private businesses or across all residential homes, it's legal. It works this way because it's not public and thus doesn't demand a common agreement.

Originally posted by Pinke

Originally posted by gangdumstyle
Pussy Riot has started a bit of a fad.. It is like copy cat crimes,

Femen has been around since before Pussy Riot and have always been this way.

FEMEN explained its methodology of topless protesting by saying: "This is the only way to be heard in this country. If we staged simple protests with banners, then our claims would not have been noticed".

Source

They kind of have a point I guess unfortunately. It probably doesn't make persons who are against gay marriage change their mind, but I doubt that's the point.

Originally posted by DarknStormy
Is this what all homosexuals are like? At least I know where all the good women have gone now..

This would be the equivalent of me asking if all Christians are like the Westboro Baptist Church.

Femen has perhaps a few hundred member maximum, and I doubt all of them are active. Unfortunately, Femen do have a point ... 20 topless people in the street will get 10x more attention than 1000 clothed persons being respectful. Westboro uses the same strategies.

The media really stirs the pot / makes divisions larger by focusing on these things. We fall for this every time though and thus encourage the circus shows. Why?

Originally posted by ToneDeaf
strangers adopting orphaned kids must obviously
provide a safe NATURAL environment.
If gays were meant to have kids, they would procreate.
Just as it should be illegal for any gay catholic priest
to adopt,

Lesbian reproductive systems haven't been dormant for the last 100, 000 years. Is not entirely uncommon for lesbian women to have short periods in their life where they become close to a male friend or similarish and children happen.

In a tribal situation, lesbian women with natural desires to parent would certainly ease the pressure on the tribe when parents die, abandon their children, or any number of similar situations. Nothing not natural about any of that.

In fact, when we watch nature videos of animals taking care of smaller animals, sometimes even from different species, we celebrate how nice they are! Then we berate how our own kind allegedly don't have the same instincts ... and yet we do, but religion would ask us to actively suppress them.

Anyway, discussing this in the middle of thread about topless protesting seems not so productive haha

Actually I found the post insightful..

I didn't know much about the femen** group..

Did not know they were around before pussy riot.
It just seems like we are hearing more of these stories since pussy
riot started their sentences.

Originally posted by SearchLightsInc

Originally posted by wingsfan
Bunch of degenerate femanazis who don't even realize they are just the end result of decades worth of brainwashing from our enemies.

Okay you have an opinion on how we got here... and then...

I would of beat the hell out of them disrespectful whores, just like they did in France last year when this group tried the same crap.

Yup, I can see absolutely no reason at all why feminism wouldn't seek to change the lives of women to escape this kind of Neanderthal knuckle dragging thinking, none at all. In fact, why wouldnt a woman want to get beaten for expressing her political beliefs? Why wouldn't she want to be called a whore because she is simply "exposing" herself in public?

You, sir, are an idiot.

I agree, with everything they said except
*beating them whores* were not muslims!!
No one should be beat for protesting, women should not be beat for talking back to a husband or B/f or whatever..

reply to post by gangdumstyle


Because gay marriage is the absolute most pressuring problem we're facing right now. MFW

This is truly the right to bear arms.

reply to post by gangdumstyle


I see gay rights activists are still aligning themselves with a supremacist movement, I guess birds of a feather tend to flock together. No sense of pride,dignity or morality. I wonder if the act of homosexuality is what is offensive or the sociopathic nature in which homosexuals seem to justify their actions and associations is what is an abomination.

Really, I wonder how many psychopathic traits are found in the gay community on average, but for now I will have to leave it as a wonder as it is getting closer to the time I need to wake up then the time I need to go to sleep. It would make an interesting inquiry though...

---

Why are they wasting their time protesting the Pope? The Pope has zero say in this matter. Seriously, they should be peacefully praying to the Lord for an answer on this as the Popes hands are tide by Scripture, the Law and cannon law.