UFO / Space creature Above the Earth in NASA Space Photograph, page 2

Pages: << 1 2 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 01:31 PM by Phage

reply to post by OmegaLogos

However,... I now wonder why space debris looks green?

What space debris? The debris is on the film, not in space.

edit on 1/13/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 01:44 PM by OmegaLogos

reply to post by Phage

Explanation: So let me get this straight ...

It is a very expensive film camera with very expensive film and it has debris floating around inside the camera!

And when you say dirt you don't mean space debris such as was mentioned previously in the thread by both miniatus and blackcube.

Personal Disclosure: Or is it film processing error of the negetives back on earth???

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 01:54 PM by Phage

reply to post by OmegaLogos

Explanation: So let me get this straight ...

It is a very expensive film camera with very expensive film and it has debris floating around inside the camera!

Explanation: No.
It is debris on the film that was in storage before it was scanned. Have you ever scanned old slides?

Another shot from the same mission.
eol.jsc.nasa.gov...

edit on 1/13/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 03:36 PM by NightFlight

Originally posted by Equiinox
Here is a photograph from NASA showing an unidentified flying object / Space creature

Original Image [ From NASA ] :

This thing is truly strange as it appears to have some type of sharp edges on the bottom of it. The UFO is possibly green in color.

SOURCE

Looks like a living creature to me
What do you think ?

Looks like (to me) a red lectroid spaceship from Buckaroo Banzai. Just sayin'...

edit on 13-1-2013 by NightFlight because: Inserted comment in wrong area.

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 03:53 PM by gunshooter

Originally posted by Snoopie
I would like to know whats in the background before i hazard a guess at what this could possibly be.

You got any more information.

Uhh, clouds and blue sky!

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 05:35 PM by JimOberg

Thanks for the links and analysis, looks like real progress.

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 06:59 PM by Bilk22

The heck with the object for now. What is this type of cloud pattern and what makes it?

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 07:19 PM by Phage

reply to post by Bilk22

Atmospheric gravity waves. Various causes.
oiswww.eumetsat.org...

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 08:21 PM by RUFFREADY

Here's the thing on you tube. I didn't see it posted . So It is now. The End

YouTube Link

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 08:46 PM by chrismarco

reply to post by Equiinox

I'm going to say debree on the picture...when you look around you will notice a strand of lint and some other dirt/dust...

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 09:10 PM by _BoneZ_

Originally posted by gunshooter

Originally posted by Snoopie
I would like to know whats in the background before i hazard a guess at what this could possibly be.

Uhh, clouds and blue sky!

Uh, you can't see the blue sky from a high orbit. You can only see blue oceans and brown/green lands.

reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 09:26 PM by Common Good

reply to post by Bilk22

UFO Chemtrails.

They are poisoning our air.

...gettin hard...to breathe...ew.wtfg ,,

jk

reply posted on 14-1-2013 @ 12:53 PM by HistrionicSpock

It is quite obviously one of these:

We simply need to call the Enterprise to communicate with it.

reply posted on 21-1-2013 @ 03:29 PM by Bilk22

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Bilk22

Atmospheric gravity waves. Various causes.
oiswww.eumetsat.org...

Well I guess that makes sense considering they were in the vicinity of an "object" defying gravity

reply posted on 21-1-2013 @ 03:34 PM by Bilk22

Originally posted by chrismarco
reply to post by Equiinox

I'm going to say debree on the picture...when you look around you will notice a strand of lint and some other dirt/dust...

I saw the lint, but I want my money back if this is what we're paying billions of dollars for. I mean all of the hi-tech stuff we pay for to photograph and monitor the heaven and sun is full of "particles" and "lint" and can't even capture an image without "glare" or "lens flare". What good is this stuff? Did they buy this stuff at Walmart and it's made in China or something?

reply posted on 21-1-2013 @ 03:38 PM by lynnlynn

Interesting, I first thought it might be cloud formation, but if you look closely there are dots that go around the middle and they are perfectly spaced, windows maybe!

reply posted on 21-1-2013 @ 04:15 PM by Phage

reply to post by Bilk22

The original image is on film.
When film is stored it gets dusty.
When that film is scanned the dust shows up on the scan.

reply posted on 21-1-2013 @ 07:17 PM by spiritualarchitect

So somethig with a shell shape on top and lights and proportional antenna legs on the bottom looks like lint?

Once again, for NASA to have an alien vehicle on their website you have only a few choices.
The object is 1/4 above the center of the photo, meaning the object seems to be the focus of the photo and the reason the photo was taken.

The blank cloud photo taken at around the same time could have been right after the object disappeared into the clouds. Or it could be that someone at NASA placed a hoax photo on their website. But then why leave the original blank photo there?

The smart people on ATS know that aliens are here and we know that NASA knows aliens are here... so what is the best explanation?

Lint [stop laughing]?
Space junk that no company has provided proof of making [and probably never will]?
Whistleblower photo of alien craft?
NASA Disclosure test photo of alien craft?
Photo of alien craft that NASA was never supposed to publish?
Photo hoaxed by NASA employee?

reply posted on 22-1-2013 @ 08:53 AM by draknoir2

Originally posted by lynnlynn
Interesting, I first thought it might be cloud formation, but if you look closely there are dots that go around the middle and they are perfectly spaced, windows maybe!

A space monster with windows?

Absurd!

reply posted on 22-1-2013 @ 07:24 PM by grey9438

it almost looks like a jellyfish to, if its not a camera/lens issue or something natural it could be a living thing

Pages: << 1 2 >> ^^TOP^^