It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Helig
Waste of time, the GOP needs to run an electable candidate if they want to reverse their poor showings the last two elections. besides other people with a better chance of winning are likely to get the party nomination anyway, Gov Chris Christie of NJ comes to mind.
Originally posted by solongandgoodnight
reply to post by spacedog1973
you just took time out of your day to post "does it matter"?
i disagree with you in the fact that you think it's just the democratic party....i was trying to point out (and poorly) that both parties are the same. Christie = more of the same.
Originally posted by jimmiec
reply to post by solongandgoodnight
How ironic that Democrat Presidents presided over 90% of the wars America has fought. Even the Iraq war was pushed by Democrats long before Bush took office. If any party can be decried as war mongering it is the Democrat party. The facts speak for themselves. Just because they speak softly does not mean they don't carry a big stick. Try reading some real history.
Originally posted by solongandgoodnight
reply to post by spacedog1973
fair enough, thank you for giving your opinion. you very well may be right, but i feel it's possible some will find him more acceptable because he seems to be more mainstream......and i'm not saying that is a good thing, i'm just saying.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Rand has a better chance than Ron, if only because he plays into the 'party' line more. But the GOP is dumb if they run him out there. I can think of 3 FAR more electable people than Rand.
'Course, thats all assuming there actually IS an election in 2016.
Originally posted by solongandgoodnight
reply to post by captaintyinknots
i'm really not a republican so it's hard for me to even consider that i might vote for another republican candidate, but i get your point.
Originally posted by TheLieWeLive
I wanted Ron Paul to win but I don't know about Rand. They aren't the same.
I'm going to go ahead and make the prediction that Hillary wins in 2016. I don't believe we pick our presidents but we are fooled into thinking we do.
She's next to the throne. You'll have to wait 4 years to see but I got Obama right and it's not because I wanted him to win again it's because I see it for what it really is....one big staged reality show.