If you can't get people to watch that entire film, at least try to get them to watch collateral murder.
It's truly despicable... and very eerie for me to watch because they tend to act like it's a video game. It feels a lot like an online game room
during a wow raid or something. that is very eerie to me because I am aware of a certain "instructional modeling" program that the department of
defense is funding and you may have even seen major TV station like FOX playing commercials that are asking for donations to fund PTSD programs.
They make you believe it's to help vets who have come home but it is actually for acute cases of PTSD in active combat because there are many cases
of soldiers experiencing trauma like this and not wanting to engage in more combat. I worked for a company who built simulation trainers that used
audio/video headsets and fake equipment to simulate battle... like a video game, but then they scored a contract from the DOD for a PTSD program and
hired a woman doctor who had studied these types of things and EEG processes who had already previously been involved in scoring over 15 million in
defense contracts. This is all related to the neurofeedback programs that you can read about online if you dig. They essentially are reprogramming
soldiers via the subconscious with the same neurofeedback that they replicate from training sessions with these video simulators while giving you
Anything fed into your brains back door is a type of hypnotism and is much stronger than mere symbols we see on TV that are already doing a good job
of brainwashing people. So what this does is refresh the soldier's subconscious (even though they are only aware of the device on their head) with
the same brain signals that the safety and excitement that the training simulators give... like a video game.... while giving them "instructional
modeling" It is meant to totally re-psyche their subconscious.
Creepy stuff... and you think your donations are going to the amputees in the commercial. No.
These PTSD programs are purely psychological.
Anyway... I read this article today concerning a British journalist. I think it fits in here... if you read it you might see why. I have two issues
with the article I am curious about... perhaps three.
He was smuggled into Lebanon after receiving a pretty bad leg wound... by rebels. My first question is how do these rebels find time in their busy
schedules of toppling a regime in a country they likely (in many cases it seems) are not even from (which they seem pretty damn proficient at for mere
civilians) to smuggle a British journalist into Lebanon?? It seems they are not generally this polite, especially to westerners who are not picking up
guns with them. Perhaps because some of these journalist are working along side them?
Us Americans with all our freedoms are lucky to even gather up a large protest, much less overthrow our government... Do you really think this is
civilian lead? Not a chance, in my opinion.
My second issue is the comment he makes that he does not do this for the money but that it's a vocation and as soon as his leg gets better, he's
going back to help give the rebels a voice. I assume the interviewer asked him who he worked for... is that true and this was his retort??? What does
that mean? I call BS and that he is NOT funding HIMSELF to go into Syria where he almost got killed because he's a nice person, but that he declines
to answer much about money because he is being paid by someone who does not want a lot of attention. Make sense? I think it does.
Is it a coincidence that France and GB are two of the countries wanting to take down Assads regime for war crimes right now? Like who the hell is GB
to point a finger for war crimes?... and why are there British and French journalist so eager to go into a war zone to cover rebel activity?
Not to mention the fact that we have all been seeing rebel YT videos that are supposed to depict their struggle, but rather depict what kind of
animals these people are. Who are these crazy cameramen anyway that can stand just a few feet from these terrorists and not be concerned for their
lives? ... but he does it because they don't have a voice? Why does he seem mostly interested in certain warzone in his professional... oops, I meant
vocational career? Why not film starving people in Africa?
Anyone else think there is a propaganda machine here with European interest?
Of course I'm not knocking Europeans in general so maybe some of you want to tell me what the price of gas is in European countries is these
days...seeing as how this is connected to Iran and cohesion of non allied countries.
I'm not buying this crap for one second.