The beezzer's Court. On trial, The 2nd Amendment

reply to post by superman2012


I spent the afternoon at the Forget Me Not Clinic. I opted for the complete political mini-mind wipe. It was performed by unbiased clinicians...I'm good to go for Jury Duty....

Des

reply to post by Destinyone


Lol Des. Apparently I should go to the pay-more-money-for-pay-attention therapy! lol@me

Are we allowed to ask one question each of potential jurors? I think it would be fun. They could lie if they want, I don't believe they would though. Just to see where they stand.

Or should we just accept them at face value as we have no other people volunteering and I refuse to recruit.

Are we all in agreement that we are sticking to the facts and not bringing anyones personal opinions from other threads into this

Originally posted by superman2012
Are we all in agreement that we are sticking to the facts and not bringing anyones personal opinions from other threads into this

I have already poured a line of salt across all thresholds leading into this thread. We are safe....

Des

reply to post by superman2012

Well at the moment we're at a bit of a disadvantage. Discovery means the prosecution has to share it's general approach and case with the defense. Otherwise, defense counsel can't know what to defend. I suppose the degree and definition of discovery is up to His Fuzziness to determine. It is a serious thing to establish on specifics of charges/civil point of challenge though.

We have a very solid opening statement prepared and will be a good one for those out there to read, indeed.

After that though, defending the 2nd in a general way can simply point to Stare decisis and say Heller makes check mate. I assume we wanted to be more ..narrowly directed by what is being challenged, of course. Surely a more lengthy proceeding than one post per side to a summary verdict is the intent. So do help, all powerful prosecutors. Cough that discovery stuff up.

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


I think the Defense/Prosecution knows how to present this case.


Facts, not opinion.

reply to post by superman2012


If your honor wishes for me to answer any questions. I shall answer honestly.

And we have protection from Des that no evil will come us



Thank you Des

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


You assume Heller is your checkmate... Dun dun DUNNN! lol
Yes, we must wait for the Beez to let us know exactly how much we have to share...from specifics of what we will be presenting or a very vague statement like we have made previously...antiquated and not relevant.

reply to post by superman2012


Good enough? That should give you enough to prepare on right?

No stats, witnesses or any other form of paraphernalia will be required by me, I will simply show using only the wording of the 2nd that it is no longer relevant to this day and age.

And from checking the members of the defence as well a couple jurors post history I know they agree with me

Originally posted by superman2012
...antiquated and not relevant.

Clearly Opinion, especially if you are talking about the 2nd Amendment.




I suggest you read my Sig, to see how Our first President thought about firearms.......

I will state for the record that prosecution does not have to go into specifics and that they have indicated the aspects of the case that they wish to pursue.

reply to post by sonnny1


He could've thought whatever he wanted, he isn't on trial. We intend to provide our case later for the jury to decide. We can debate it then.

Originally posted by sonnny1

Originally posted by superman2012
...antiquated and not relevant.

Clearly Opinion, especially if you are talking about the 2nd Amendment.

I suggest you read my Sig, to see how Our first President thought about firearms.......

If that is the aspect(s) that they wish to pursue, I will allow it.

Originally posted by beezzer
I will state for the record that prosecution does not have to go into specifics and that they have indicated the aspects of the case that they wish to pursue.

Thank you, your honor. Might I add I always respected you and I am quite sure you are a handsome man, if your intelligence is any indication of looks.

The trial will start in 8 - 10 hours from now. Get some sleep, get a tattoo, purchase a lobster and learn the guygam-style dance.
However you prepare.

I'll have the complete list of both councils and the jury then.

reply to post by beezzer


Question:
Do we get extra points if we do all that while dancing the Gangnam style dance?

Originally posted by IkNOwSTuff
reply to post by GoOfYFoOt

 

I formally charge the 2nd with being a very naughty boy!!!!!!!!

edit on 13/1/2013 by IkNOwSTuff because: (no reason given)

Unfortunately, I missed your post, prior to edit, but after reading your charge, I couldn't pen my motion fast enough...!

See you in court, conselor...

Originally posted by superman2012

Originally posted by beezzer
I will state for the record that prosecution does not have to go into specifics and that they have indicated the aspects of the case that they wish to pursue.

Thank you, your honor. Might I add I always respected you and I am quite sure you are a handsome man, if your intelligence is any indication of looks.

Since what you stated is true, I will allow it.

Originally posted by GoOfYFoOt

Originally posted by IkNOwSTuff
reply to post by GoOfYFoOt

 

I formally charge the 2nd with being a very naughty boy!!!!!!!!

edit on 13/1/2013 by IkNOwSTuff because: (no reason given)

Unfortunately, I missed your post, prior to edit, but after reading your charge, I couldn't pen my motion fast enough...!

See you in court, conselor...

*phew*