It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ConservativeAwakening
Piers Morgan seems fairly intelligent and definitely knows what he's talking about
Originally posted by HairlessApe
I argue that this country was founded on the principal that ALL ideas should be given the time of day. Most of us do cherish the constitution and all that it stands for, however, it is not un-American to disagree with that sentiment. Let the man be heard. His point is a little unlearned, but there is some wisdom in it. Politicians do often ignore the constitution - can you argue that?
Originally posted by HairlessApe
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by IvanAstikov
Did you think that was also the reason JFK was assassinated?
Somebody just watched "Dark Legacy."
Can we please stay -somewhat- on point? This isn't a forum about who killed Kennedy or which president is involved in the NWO, it's about the debate on gun laws between Piers Morgan and his guest.edit on 12-1-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)
In his Guns & Ammo column, Reagan left little doubt about his stance on the Second Amendment, writing: “In my opinion, proposals to outlaw or confiscate guns are simply unrealistic panacea.”
Reagan’s stance was that violent crime would never be eliminated, with or without gun control. Instead, he said, efforts to curb crime should target those who misuse guns, similarly to the way laws target those who use an automobile feloniously or recklessly. Saying the Second Amendment “leaves little, if any, leeway for the gun control advocate,” he added that “the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms must not be infringed if liberty in America is to survive.”
The lone piece of significant legislation related to gun rights during the Reagan administration was the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986. Signed into law by Reagan on May 19, 1986, the legislation amended the Gun Control Act of 1968 by repealing parts of the original act that were deemed by studies to be unconstitutional.
The National Rifle Association and other pro gun groups lobbied for passage of the legislation, and it was generally considered favorable for gun owners. Among other things, the act made it easier to transport long rifles across the United States, ended federal records-keeping on ammunition sales and prohibited the prosecution of someone passing through areas with strict gun control with firearms in their vehicle, so long as the gun were properly stored.
On a conspiracy-orientated board, the idea that the FF's created the constitution to deceive the riff-raff into thinking they had liberty, knowing that one day its vagueness and ambiguity would be used by existing govts to foment unrest, is hardly as out there as some stuff I've read.
Originally posted by lolita64
Another reason to deport that piece of garbage Morgan... he's not even a citizen and yet he's talking against the founding document of the country!
How is he not classified as a foreign agent trying to destroy the US?? He should be arrested and sent to Guantanamo for his BS... there he'll learn what government tyranny is that or deport him to North Korea where he can fully live what happens when everybody is disarmed and psychopaths take over.edit on 11-1-2013 by lolita64 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by HairlessApe
1. ok, link your 'proof' please.
2. see #1
3. no clue but it's certainly not your forte
4. sure have but you keep avoiding mine, why is that ?
whatever, it seems there is a small plane crash on the grounds of one of our college campuses ... have to do this laters. bye.
Originally posted by dogstar23
Originally posted by lolita64
Another reason to deport that piece of garbage Morgan... he's not even a citizen and yet he's talking against the founding document of the country!
How is he not classified as a foreign agent trying to destroy the US?? He should be arrested and sent to Guantanamo for his BS... there he'll learn what government tyranny is that or deport him to North Korea where he can fully live what happens when everybody is disarmed and psychopaths take over.edit on 11-1-2013 by lolita64 because: (no reason given)
Ack...i'm in full disagreement with Morgan, but what is with this sudden obsession people have with wanting to deport foreigners, legally in this country for expressing their views? Would it suddenly make everyone feel better if he had to wake up at an odd hour to broadcast his piece live at the same time slot? We're not under an iron curtain (though obviously many are clamoring for us to be) - it doesn't matter where he is located, we have satellites. He could say the same thing from Sudan and it would still show up on televisions for people to go into an "I DON'T WANT TO BE HEARING HIS OPINION!" fit.
Calm down, people. Why the terror over someone speaking their kind? And then to throw the "if you don't think like me, you're a terrorist" kind of W-Bush/1984/PATRIOT Act nonsense in to boot is just plain embarassing.
He says what he wants to say, and so what? Why are people cowering in fear over some guy's opinion? I just disagree and plain don't give a damn what he says.
Sorry, but I just can't believe I keep seeing this same type of comment so often now whenever someone speaks a contrary opinion. Why it bothers me most is that it shows pure cowardice and small-mindedness.
Originally posted by HairlessApe
Originally posted by dogstar23
Originally posted by lolita64
Another reason to deport that piece of garbage Morgan... he's not even a citizen and yet he's talking against the founding document of the country!
How is he not classified as a foreign agent trying to destroy the US?? He should be arrested and sent to Guantanamo for his BS... there he'll learn what government tyranny is that or deport him to North Korea where he can fully live what happens when everybody is disarmed and psychopaths take over.edit on 11-1-2013 by lolita64 because: (no reason given)
Ack...i'm in full disagreement with Morgan, but what is with this sudden obsession people have with wanting to deport foreigners, legally in this country for expressing their views? Would it suddenly make everyone feel better if he had to wake up at an odd hour to broadcast his piece live at the same time slot? We're not under an iron curtain (though obviously many are clamoring for us to be) - it doesn't matter where he is located, we have satellites. He could say the same thing from Sudan and it would still show up on televisions for people to go into an "I DON'T WANT TO BE HEARING HIS OPINION!" fit.
Calm down, people. Why the terror over someone speaking their kind? And then to throw the "if you don't think like me, you're a terrorist" kind of W-Bush/1984/PATRIOT Act nonsense in to boot is just plain embarassing.
He says what he wants to say, and so what? Why are people cowering in fear over some guy's opinion? I just disagree and plain don't give a damn what he says.
Sorry, but I just can't believe I keep seeing this same type of comment so often now whenever someone speaks a contrary opinion. Why it bothers me most is that it shows pure cowardice and small-mindedness.
It's really always been that way, and the only feasible answer is fear, nationalism, and to an extent - racism. Haven't you heard the term "go back to Africa" before? It's no different than "go back to the British Isles."
And indeed, it is about people not wanting to hear any opinion of their own. And more often than not, those same people defend the constitution - the very document which gives us the right to say what we like (to an extent) regardless of opinion.edit on 12-1-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by IvanAstikov
On a conspiracy-orientated board, the idea that the FF's created the constitution to deceive the riff-raff into thinking they had liberty, knowing that one day its vagueness and ambiguity would be used by existing govts to foment unrest, is hardly as out there as some stuff I've read.
It's definitely "out there" and definitely bogus. Sorry. it's a no go conspiracy wise. You would be hard pressed to find evidence that even the Freemasons had that in mind.
Here is the simplest argument against that idea. Those very men who crafted the Declaration of Independence and later the Constitution put their lives on the line and fought an entire war for freedom. Whey then would they craft a document which would pretend at liberty?
edit on 12-1-2013 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
but what is with this sudden obsession people have with wanting to deport foreigners, legally in this country for expressing their views? Would it suddenly make everyone feel better if he had to wake up at an odd hour to broadcast his piece live at the same time slot? We're not under an iron curtain (though obviously many are clamoring for us to be) - it doesn't matter where he is located, we have satellites
Originally posted by SpearMint
Well his belittling of the constitution is quite justified. It's outdated and treated like no one would be free without it. It could be destroyed today and there would be no difference, if anything it's a hindrance because it blinds people from reality while they protect their "freedom".
So, you'd prefer to believe that the group of politicians/power seekers who helped draft the Constitution were the first and last honest govt ever, or do you think this inherent goodness continued unabated for a long time afterwards? Care to point me to the last time period when a govt was trustworthy?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by dogstar23
but what is with this sudden obsession people have with wanting to deport foreigners, legally in this country for expressing their views? Would it suddenly make everyone feel better if he had to wake up at an odd hour to broadcast his piece live at the same time slot? We're not under an iron curtain (though obviously many are clamoring for us to be) - it doesn't matter where he is located, we have satellites
Well, you are quite right that our freedom of speech does differentiate us say...from the former German empire, or Mussolini's Italy, or perhaps some Marxist guerilla dictatorship in South American or Africa. Also, Prez Wilson did introduce the Sedition Act.
Most Americans just don't think that condemning the Constitution is cool, that is unless you are far left leaning...
Although, I'm conservative (duh), I do have to say that the country wasn't always too keen to completely leave the 1st amendment alone, think about the communist scare directly after ww2, freedom of speech was heavily tightened, maybe legitimately......but it's not like the 1st was always upheld throughout history.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by _BoneZ_
FFs................THEY WERE NOT ASSAULT RIFLES!
These friggin people need to STOP parroting that they are ASSUALT rifles they are NOT assault files!
A rapid-fire, magazine-fed automatic rifle designed for infantry use
they are semi automatic rifles........with a different COVER then a wooden stock.........THATS IT!
If people who are pro gun would start correcting this freaking false terminology then MAYBE we could get an honest damn discussion