posted on Jan, 11 2013 @ 11:13 AM
Even possible yes , by using the term "in the interest of national security" This is one way the POUTS could ban the sale, owner ship of, and or use
of semi auto weapons.
Would it mean a gun grab door to door confiscation? NO, to many out there, but it would mean that after the fact no one could , with out the hoop and
loops to jump through, be able to own or buy one, just like full auto or mil type collective weapon ie mg 42 or a thompson45 or a BAR, not everyone
has one but then if you have the $$$ the back ground checks and the will to fill out mounds of paper work you too can own one.
Is this right? 1968 gun act says so will you still have the right to bear arms yes bolt action and six shooters Want to know the real ban issues
read this and then say they took my fire arms away.
from the link
The National Firearms Act of 1934, after the handgun registration provisions were
deleted, was a concentrated attack on civilian ownership of machine guns, sawed-off shotguns, silencers, and other relatively rare firearms that had
acquired reputations as gangster weapons during the years preceding its passage. Modeled on the Harrison Narcotics Act, the N.F.A. based its
regulatory powers on a tax imposed on traffic in the weapons, thus generating federal jurisdiction for intrastate as well as interstate transactions.
The tax rate, $200 per transfer, did not seem calculated to encourage extensive commerce in these weapon. The Act also provided for the immediate
registration of all covered weapons, even if illegally owned¾a provision altered in 1968, after the United States Supreme Court held the 1934
provision to be an infringement on the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. [Page 139]
so you see the gun ban grab has been
around for a long time it is nothing new,
It is just a tax and only the rich can and will be able to defend them selves.