It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
It is not a request to test on children at all - that is pure scaremongering.
It is a discussion as to whether OR NOT it would be ethical to test on children - many vaccine proponents say there is no point - the chances of an anthrax attack are miniscule, and how would you figure out the results anyway n the absence of actual anthrax?
The discussion itself, rather than the stupid scaremongering headlines, can be found here - note that it is "establishment" bioethicists who are opposing any suggestion of carrying out such trials.
Come on; the ONLY reason to discuss the issue is because someone wants to do it. If no one did, discussion would not be necessary.
No - that is not the only reason - it is entirely possible to discuss something that someone thinks MAY be requested at some time, and have "the answer" ready before the topic ever comes up.
But putting that aside just for the moment - where in any of it is the "Obama Administration" that wants to do such testing?
where in any of it is the "Obama Administration" that wants to do such testing?
“We need to know more about the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine as we develop plans to use the vaccine on a large number of children in the event of a bioterrorist’s attack,” said Ruth L. Berkelman of Emory University, a panel member.
Yesterday it was announced that the government would be purchasing 3.42 million doses of anthrax vaccine to add to the civilian anthrax vaccine stockpile. This is on top of the military stockpile, and comes out of DHHS funds. The purchase adds up to $101 million to the total contract for DHHS' anthrax stockpile, now worth about $500 million. Stockpile cost could climb to over $2 billion if the government purchases the 75 million doses it said it needed
Vaccine vials expire after 3-4 years, requiring continuous replenishment. What a marvelous business model! And what a way to throw taxpayer money into a black hole, according to the Center for American Progress.
Originally posted by WaterBottle
This should be moved to the hoax bin, or internet lies forum..
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by WaterBottle
This should be moved to the hoax bin, or internet lies forum..
...or to the forum labeled:
Posts made by people with utter disregard for truth, facts, critical thinking or simply being decent.
Originally posted by Camperguy
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by WaterBottle
This should be moved to the hoax bin, or internet lies forum..
...or to the forum labeled:
Posts made by people with utter disregard for truth, facts, critical thinking or simply being decent.
You always bring a smile to my face. Im still trying to figure out where your from.
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
Answer to your question:
where in any of it is the "Obama Administration" that wants to do such testing?
www.bioethics.gov...
The link lists future conference dates
.... and a quote from Obama that is unreal considering what they are proposing.
"As our nation invests in science and innovation and pursues advances in biomedical research and health care, it's imperative that we do so in a responsible manner." —President Barack Obama
Deny ignorance.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
Answer to your question:
where in any of it is the "Obama Administration" that wants to do such testing?
www.bioethics.gov...
There is nothing on that page about the administration proposing anthrax vaccine testing on children at all.
Did you mean this page?
The link lists future conference dates
Indeed - which is not testing children with anthrax vaccines...
.... and a quote from Obama that is unreal considering what they are proposing.
This quote?
"As our nation invests in science and innovation and pursues advances in biomedical research and health care, it's imperative that we do so in a responsible manner." —President Barack Obama
What is unreal about it, since they are proposing that such advances should be made in an ethical manner? Are you suggesting that they should be made in an unethical manner? Or that there should be no advances at all??
Deny ignorance.
Try it some time.
edit on 13-1-2013 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
On January 6, 2012, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius asked the
Commission to ``conduct a thorough review of the ethical considerations
of conducting clinical trials of medical countermeasures in children,''
including the ethical considerations of conducting a pre- and post- event pediatric study of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA) as a component
of post-exposure prophylaxis, in order to address ``how best to obtain
clinical data on medical countermeasures in children.'' Accordingly,
the Commission is examining ethical issues surrounding the development
of medical treatments to keep children safe in the event of a public
health emergency. While significant progress has been made in the
development of medical countermeasures for adults, the development of
similar products for children has lagged, in part because of challenges
in conducting safety and immunogenicity studies. In the 2011 report,
``Challenges in the Use of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA) in the
Pediatric Population as a Component of Post-Exposure Prophylaxis,'' the
National Biodefense Science Board recommended that the Department of
Health and Human Services move forward with testing AVA before a public
health emergency but only after the ethical considerations are
adequately addressed and reviewed.
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
Did you see the word "Anthrax" and did you see the word "children?" If not, please go over it a few times and maybe you will find them. Also, did you notice the articles have a government link?
Accordingly, the Commission is examining ethical issues surrounding the development of medical treatments to keep children safe in the event of a public health emergency.
This repetition is getting tiresome.
The anthrax vaccine is known to be safe in adults. More than 10 million doses have been given to 1.2 million people – most of them in the U.S. military – with no major side effects. But there have been no studies on whether the vaccine is safe with children.
The chairman of the National Biodefense Science Board said today while his panel voted in favor of testing children with an anthrax vaccine prior to any anthrax threat, it also wanted a second opinion: an ethical review of doing the test.
Originally posted by Adaluncatif
The purpose of anthrax vaccination is future conflict with Russia. Russia has an anthrax program that includes genetically engineered strains and unique coating technology that reduces electrostatic clumping which allows them to create an anthrax "gas". People in government expect the US to do something that will produce a Russian anthrax attack. I find it disturbing that some were urging that this story be labeled HOAX. The fact that more than one person would take the effort to do that makes me wonder if there is an agenda to bury the story.
Thank you for contacting the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.
At the request of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, the Commission is conducting a careful and transparent review of the ethical considerations of conducting clinical trials of medical countermeasures with children.
The Commission does not have a research protocol before it. It is outside the purview of the Commission’s Charter to review a specific protocol under HHS’ human subjects protections regulations. The task before the Commission is to enumerate the ethical considerations surrounding medical countermeasures research with children generally and those associated with a pediatric AVA study, specifically. The Commission will not render a final decision as to whether a particular study should move forward. Nor is it working to justify any particular protocol or outcome.
Again, thank you contacting the Commission.
Hillary Wicai Viers
Communications Director
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues
www.bioethics.gov
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
It is not a request to test on children at all - that is pure scaremongering.
It is a discussion as to whether OR NOT it would be ethical to test on children - many vaccine proponents say there is no point - the chances of an anthrax attack are miniscule, and how would you figure out the results anyway n the absence of actual anthrax?
The discussion itself, rather than the stupid scaremongering headlines, can be found here - note that it is "establishment" bioethicists who are opposing any suggestion of carrying out such trials.
Come on; the ONLY reason to discuss the issue is because someone wants to do it. If no one did, discussion would not be necessary.
No - that is not the only reason - it is entirely possible to discuss something that someone thinks MAY be requested at some time, and have "the answer" ready before the topic ever comes up.
But putting that aside just for the moment - where in any of it is the "Obama Administration" that wants to do such testing?