Originally posted by Bedlam
What sort of waves?
The wave phenomenon observed when a photon interacts with the Aether (neutrinos and/or plasma field: no I don't have all the answers but it's better
than pretending to know when one hasn't a clue.. Like the vast majority of the scientific community do. BTW, I don‘t blame you for believing them
more than me) and that is mistakenly taken for a different state of the photon/light. Read up on wave/particle duality and quantum state
However, neutrinos are not EM. And plasma is not electromagnetic. Plasma is ionized gas atoms.
Where did I say that neutrinos were EM? However, they have a mass (logical deduction since they exist and interact with matter. YES, they can and they
even can be collected.). As for plasma, I'll admit I'm not very knowledgeable on the subject. But it seems a possibility for it to be the Aether of
old. Neutrinos may even FORM the plasma (like photons the light).
An indirect proof that Aether is NOT there, is before you in the form of your LCD monitor.
Weak interaction not compromising the functioning of 'LCD screens' can still occur. The fact that LCD monitors function doesn't prove the absence
Light in vacuo doesn't change speed based on energy.
There is no such thing as 'Vacuum'/void/nothingness. This stance is, by the way contradicted by facts since neutrinos are always there passing
through. Theory discard (ignore) them but this is simply ludicrous.
And yes, the speed of light changes base on the energy of the photon, its wavelength then.
The inconsistency of redshift values between two galaxies (of different type) or a galaxy and a quasar linked by a bridge of matter, as well as the
tunnel effect PROVE just that.
Denying evidence and results of experiences doesn't change anything to this fact.
THE SPEED OF LIGHT (photons) ISN'T CONSTANT. Period.
But you seem to already be on your way to accept that, you just don't realize it:
You can get some neat effects when light interacts with matter. That always slows it down, although they're still traveling at the speed of
light. It's just that the speed of light is slower in a non-vacuum. Also, in some media you get dispersion, which WILL cause light passing through
that medium to travel at different speeds depending on its energy.
You, yourself, is saying than the speed of light isn’t constant. You just have to get rid of the stupid idea that a vacuum exists. And, ‘light’
takes different forms (the light spectrum) that are not of the same energy nor speed.
And check the observations and experiments I talk about. PROOF is there for those who want to ‘see‘.
By the way, when and how has it been proven that the speed of light is indeed constant??
This is nothing more than an unsubstantiated claim.
It also never has been proven that NOTHING (no other particle) could go faster.
Simply another unsubstantiated claim.
Wavelength is an aspect of waves.
It's the mesure of a photon energy and the nature we give it (infrared, ultraviolet...). I postulate it is also a(n indirect) mesure of its speed.
Waves are not wavelength.
I said that. We agree.
BUT, the wave phenomenon is the consequence of the interaction of the photon with the Aether when passing through it (like a torpedo in the ocean) NOT
a state of the photon.
There is a causal interaction at play here. And these two phenomena (particle and wave) are NOT two sides of the same coin, not a dual state revealed
by the type of observation we make. One (the particle) is the cause of the other (the wave).