It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by 1Agnostic1
Essentially instead of explaining things as everything is held together my magical forces/charges/fields, consider that what holds mass together is instead and entanglement of atomic particles. Electrons and neutrinos are long thin hair like particles. Electrons are curly and wavy, they have body, shape, elasticity, and that's what creates the charge and fields. Neutrinos are on the limp side, but better at entangling with other particles. A protonis a short barb like particle, with a a great deal more elasticity, but much shorter in length. Neutrons are gummy.
These particles come in a wide variety of shapes that create the different types of elements and the different properties.
Bring to a boil, mix and stir and you have cosmic soup.
edit on 18-1-2013 by poet1b because: Typo
Originally posted by 1Agnostic1
See, that's where you get it all wrong. How can a "volume (of space) with no matter in it" exists?
To formulate in a way you can understand: "How can 'nothing' have limit? How can 'nothing'constitute a volume?
I'll help you: It CAN'T.
'Nothing', as defined as the abscence of ANY matter, is an absolute concept, you can't limit it to a region of space because it suits you. This is utterly stupid to think simply because you can say it, it makes it true.
So, there cannot be even ONE unit of 'nothing' since, if there were such a thing it will be borderless, shapeless, limitless. Do you understand?
It would be like giving a limit to the infinite.
Is that your way of saying that you think I cleverly use rhetoric and make a sophistic argument/demonstration?
I'm aware that that's (one of) the theory (not the only one since QM tends to reject the very notion of particle altogether and prefers it the one of wave. See QM 3D ‘model’ of an atom).
But I've just demonstrated it to be false. Therefore, this 'vacuum' must be filled with something that we don’t (even try to) detect… yet.
Also, fields need 'something' to be propagated, a medium to allow particles (matter) to interact with each other and create them (forces/fields): This medium is the Aether.
A non-charged elusive yet potentially ‘omnipresent’ particle should be first on the list: that's why I propose the neutrino. But I suspect an even smaller particle to be the answer.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by Bedlam
Good that you are able to see the basics, you fail to recognize that I am discussing one rotation within another, within another still, on and on.
A good example is gyroscopic precession. It takes a much deeper understanding that you have yet to recognize.
Originally posted by poet1b
I can use a pump to evacuate a vessel, just like was presented here on these pages in the bell experiment. What's in that vessel now, now that air is gone? What' the volume of space that is "vacuo"? Well, the answer can be promptly found by measuring the volume that is now void.
Hardly! Do you have any idea what it takes just to get an atmosphere resembling 80,000 feet?
Obviously not.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
Originally posted by 1Agnostic1
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
Please, first explain what you think happens here and what does that have to do with the existence of an Aether or the fact that a vacuum cannot exist.
A vacuum was created by removing the air. What matter replaced the air to prevent a vacuum? Although it's not a perfect vacuum there's not enough air left to produce sound waves.
Wherever you are on the earth, even deeply underground, you receive per second about 400.000 billions neutrinos from the sun, but also 50 billions neutrinos (but this number is not well known!) from the natural radioactivity of the earth, and 10 to 100 billions neutrinos from nuclear plants all over the world.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by Bedlam
Are you saying the solar system doesnt rotate, the galaxy doesn't rotate?
Your grasp of the basics is seriously lacking.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by 1Agnostic1
reply to post by buddhasystem
What you explained in your post is your lack of comfort with things that are not palpable, or do not suite your preconceived notions. You don't like the idea of void, and that's that. Some people don't like blue cheese.
.
There was no logic and no demonstration
Originally posted by 1Agnostic1
A vacuum is defined as "a (region of) space that is empty of matter".
A space "empty of matter" is a space where there is nothing (no thing).
If a vacuum exists then 'nothing' exists.
If nothing exists, the universe doesn't exist (either).
The universe exists.
Therefore a vacuum cannot exist.
If a vacuum doesn't exist, then ALL of space (the whole universe) must be filled with matter. Therefore the Aether exists.
Originally posted by 1Agnostic1
'Nothing', as defined as the abscence of ANY matter, is an absolute concept, you can't limit it to a region of space because it suits you. This is utterly stupid to think simply because you can say it, it makes it true.
So, there cannot be even ONE unit of 'nothing' since, if there were such a thing it will be borderless, shapeless, limitless. Do you understand?
[...]
a vacuum (a 'unit of nothingness') would be borderless, shapeless and limitless.
Therefore, if we would consider any quantity of 'nothing' to exist, then it would encompass all and, literally, nothing could exist at all.
As something (our universe is something, right?) exists, then a vacuum ('nothing') CANNOT.
[...]
Also, fields need 'something' to be propagated, a medium to allow particles (matter) to interact with each other and create them (forces/fields): This medium is the Aether.
Originally posted by BuddhaSystem
I can use a pump to evacuate a vessel, just like was presented here on these pages in the bell experiment. What's in that vessel now, now that air is gone? What' the volume of space that is "vacuo"? Well, the answer can be promptly found by measuring the volume that is now void.
1. The sound of the buzzer isn't audible anymore as soon as he closes the lid. Sound do not only needs air to propagate, but for that air to not be enclosed, for the wave to travel 'in' it.
No MATTER is no matter, at ANY level, period.
What about the photons that go through this 'vacuum', they don't count as matter??
Because if you still can see inside this jar, it means that photons go through it too.
But you're right on one point though, this sure is not a perfect vacuum.
Seriously though, are you (more or less rhetorical) braindead?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by 1Agnostic1
Matter does not define space. Space is still there even if there's no matter in it. Calling it "nothing" and then trying to equate "nothing" with "non-existence" is a verbal misconception you can't really apply.
You're trying to use wordplay to do physics, that's never going to work for you.
You really haven't demonstrated it to be false, you've just confused yourself with inapplicable rhetoric. But if you believe in QM, you won't need Aether. So it's a bit disingenuous to invoke it and spit in its face at the same time.
Rockets [don't] need air to push against. That's why Aether was proposed in the first place then discarded once we realized you didn't need it.
Here's a hint - what sort of wave would a pervasive medium propagate? Qualitatively, that is.
ME: A non-charged elusive yet potentially ‘omnipresent’ particle should be first on the list: that's why I propose the neutrino. But I suspect an even smaller particle to be the answer.
YOU: How do you propose a non-charged non-interacting particle to be a propagating medium for...anything?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by 1Agnostic1
Uhhh...PHOTONS are Quantum Particle/Wave Forms of ENERGY.
Photons are NOT MATTER.
Space/Time is simply Universal Geometry of Dimensionality.
If you have say a 10 foot by 10 foot by 10 foot room that is a vacuum...meaning their is absolutely no matter within the walls and ceiling and floor...and then you placed a wind up alarm clock set to go off in a minute once the alarm goes off...no sound can be heard either in or outside of the room as their exists no air or any other matter to allow the transpher of kinetic energy that is sound waves.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by 1Agnostic1
1. Photons ARE NOT waves. This is bull. They are particles (QT can accept that much) that CREATE a wave travelling through the Ether (space). There is a causal effect at play here.
Originally posted by 1Agnostic1
It doesn't change the fact that NOTHING CANNOT BE SOMETHING. Not be a space, nor have a volume... is that so freaking difficult to understand?
I know... The problem is that you're so used to nonsensical concepts that your brain/mind has simply entered a reality distortion field where nothing can be something, where a phenomenon can both be X AND - X at the same time, where trajectories don't exist, where causality means nothing...
But, if you take the time to analyze what I wrote and be open-minded/objective about it, you'll see it actually makes perfect sense.
It may seem too simple to be true, but that's the way it is (and always should be).
Also, I merely specify that QM doesn't even believe in an atom as a causal (solar system-like) phenomenon in passing. I don't try to make a point out of it. It's just a precision.
Electromagnetic waves.
Where did I state it to be non-interacting?
Originally posted by Bedlam
There is no "aether". No one's had any use for it since the early 1900's. No one's ever found any. It's an idea whose time has gone, quite some time back.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by Bedlam
There is no "aether". No one's had any use for it since the early 1900's. No one's ever found any. It's an idea whose time has gone, quite some time back.
Evgeny Podkletnov has reintroduced this concept
with his claimed experimental successes