posted on Jan, 11 2013 @ 11:21 AM
Originally posted by WP4YT
The earth can only sustain 500,000 humans before they start using up the natural resources faster than they replenish. If we don't want the earth to
be destroyed we w should keep population below that.
beware all these round numbers, i have a hunch, that the more 'progressive' people consider themselves, the lower their 'estimate' for an ideal world
population will be.
ie: mainstream PR: 3 billion
'intellectuals': 1 billion
'elites': 500 million
keepers of the inner circle (or whatever): 50 million
high priests: 666k or 144k (somewhere in that ballpark)
The 'all seeing eye': Zero
PS: it's been a little more than 21 years the Soviet Union collapsed and we're now officially back at square one, barbarism, some people must be
really proud. Needless to say, the civilized veneer is very thin, but what lies underneath? hate doesn't make one strong, but it makes one
Originally posted by JBlitzen
To think that biological species development is the only kind seems... extremely simplistic.
Q: what happens with the strongest 'specimen' in wartime?
A: they get drafted, specially capable ones will then be sent into hot zones (think of Omaha Beach, Iwo Jima and such)
Q: where's the 'evolutionary benefit' in that?
let me advance a slightly different concept: societies that treat themselves with care have a chance to live, the rest will exhaust themselves in ever
increasing levels of distrust and violence, until then, the almighty social selection (