edit on 11-1-2013 by MajorKarma because: (no reason given)
Wyoming lawmakers propose bill to nullify new federal gun laws, page 3
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 08:02 AM by TKDRL
reply to post by one4all
Another person that is misled about canada maybe? We are nowhere near disarmed, canadians are just a lot less vocal about it is the only difference.
Another person that is misled about canada maybe? We are nowhere near disarmed, canadians are just a lot less vocal about it is the only difference.
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 08:52 AM by WatchRider
reply to post by Libertygal
Feel good news with a bullet
I think Idaho, Montana and other free states have already got similar laws in the pipeline.
Feel good news with a bullet
I think Idaho, Montana and other free states have already got similar laws in the pipeline.
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 09:28 AM by WatchRider
reply to post by RalagaNarHallas
The Gun Registry has not gone away in Canada.
If you have a pistol, semi-auto 'assault' rifle you still gotta register it and can only use 'em at a 'government approved' range.
So Canada has a long way to go. For hunting rifles and shotguns (not combat) they are not too bad.
The Gun Registry has not gone away in Canada.
If you have a pistol, semi-auto 'assault' rifle you still gotta register it and can only use 'em at a 'government approved' range.
So Canada has a long way to go. For hunting rifles and shotguns (not combat) they are not too bad.
edit on 11-1-2013 by WatchRider because: (no
reason given)
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 12:12 PM by LewsTherinThelamon
reply to post by Libertygal
While I agree with the sentiment, you have to understand that the laws in the US have been manipulated to suit the agendas of tyrants.
As long as we live under the 14th amendment as citizens of the United States, then we will be working as rebels for the de facto federal government.
The Federal government, as most agree, has no business stepping into state business and telling individual states what to do. For those that disagree, see the 10th ammendment.
While I agree with the sentiment, you have to understand that the laws in the US have been manipulated to suit the agendas of tyrants.
As long as we live under the 14th amendment as citizens of the United States, then we will be working as rebels for the de facto federal government.
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 12:20 PM by seabag
reply to post by Libertygal
This is encouraging yet unnecessary. Any law passed by congress that a state deems “unconstitutional” can be nullified by that state.
This is encouraging yet unnecessary. Any law passed by congress that a state deems “unconstitutional” can be nullified by that state.
“What Is It? - State nullification is the idea that the states can and must refuse to enforce unconstitutional federal laws.Rightful Remedy
Says Who? - Says Thomas Jefferson, among other distinguished Americans. His draft of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 first introduced the word “nullification” into American political life, and follow-up resolutions in 1799 employed Jefferson’s formulation that “nullification…is the rightful remedy” when the federal government reaches beyond its constitutional powers. In the Virginia Resolutions of 1798, James Madison said the states were “duty bound to resist” when the federal government violated the Constitution.
edit on 11-1-2013 by seabag because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 02:25 PM by Libertygal
reply to post by GoOfYFoOt
I think they will have only one option, and that is the same reply they had to some states pasing mj laws. Silence.
There is an old saying, and you know what they say about old sayings!
Silence is deafening, and I think in this instance, it will be the only option.
Bills will have to come to the House. I don't see them making it past. I also do not see them passing the Senate, even if they did. There are multiple reasons behind my opinion, but suffice it to say, I think a lot of this bluster is just that, bluster.
Biden is known for speaking out of turn, and I do not think Obama would be bold nor ignorant enough to attempt an executive order to grab guns. IF he does, it will be a very VERY clear indication of his intent, and the blame would fall squarely on Obama. Since Obama is known for his teflon like qualities, I don't see it happening. He always has someone, like Biden, to throw under the bus to avoid direct blame for anything. It's his MO.
I think since Wyoming was bold enough to take the first step, yet again, other states will follow, just as they did in the 10th reaffirmation movement.
Sometimes, the Feds need to be reminded what their place is. Let us not forget, as well, how really red that post-election map was. It speaks volumes about what the general state consensus will be on the issue. This is one place, as of yet - that hopefully the long arm of fraud and corruption has been unable to reach.
If it becomes necessary to place a gun manufacturer in each state, then, perhaps some companies will look at expanding their corporations.
Businesss is certainly booming!
I think they will have only one option, and that is the same reply they had to some states pasing mj laws. Silence.
There is an old saying, and you know what they say about old sayings!
Silence is deafening, and I think in this instance, it will be the only option.
Bills will have to come to the House. I don't see them making it past. I also do not see them passing the Senate, even if they did. There are multiple reasons behind my opinion, but suffice it to say, I think a lot of this bluster is just that, bluster.
Biden is known for speaking out of turn, and I do not think Obama would be bold nor ignorant enough to attempt an executive order to grab guns. IF he does, it will be a very VERY clear indication of his intent, and the blame would fall squarely on Obama. Since Obama is known for his teflon like qualities, I don't see it happening. He always has someone, like Biden, to throw under the bus to avoid direct blame for anything. It's his MO.
I think since Wyoming was bold enough to take the first step, yet again, other states will follow, just as they did in the 10th reaffirmation movement.
Sometimes, the Feds need to be reminded what their place is. Let us not forget, as well, how really red that post-election map was. It speaks volumes about what the general state consensus will be on the issue. This is one place, as of yet - that hopefully the long arm of fraud and corruption has been unable to reach.
If it becomes necessary to place a gun manufacturer in each state, then, perhaps some companies will look at expanding their corporations.
Businesss is certainly booming!
edit on 11-1-2013 by Libertygal because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 02:40 PM by Libertygal
reply to post by seabag
It isn't that I disagree it is unecessary. It is a statement, just as the states re-affirming their 10th was unecessary. It was a statement.
We see what you are doing. We don't like what you are doing. You do not have the right to come tell our state what to do. There will be repercussions. And, most of all, it tells the public in no uncertain terms, "We've got your back."
It will soon hopefully be a law in Wyoming if the Fed's arrest someone, the state will come to your defense. How awesome is that? How awesome?
For the people that legally own, and responsibly handle their guns, that are now being pointed at by media and the outspoken anti-gun brigade, it must be very nice to know your STATE supports your Constitutional rights.
Then, you have states like NY, where Cuomo went on a tirade telling people confiscation was a feel good idea. Where would you feel most comfortable living if you were a legal, responsible gun owner? A state rife with threats and uncertainty, or one that passed a law promising to support and defend you?
That is why so many people hope more states step up to the plate. They feel unsure. Uncertain. Insecure. Are you really going to let Obama do this?
Well, Wyoming citizens know, don't they?
The rest of the states? We shall see.
So far...
It isn't that I disagree it is unecessary. It is a statement, just as the states re-affirming their 10th was unecessary. It was a statement.
We see what you are doing. We don't like what you are doing. You do not have the right to come tell our state what to do. There will be repercussions. And, most of all, it tells the public in no uncertain terms, "We've got your back."
It will soon hopefully be a law in Wyoming if the Fed's arrest someone, the state will come to your defense. How awesome is that? How awesome?
For the people that legally own, and responsibly handle their guns, that are now being pointed at by media and the outspoken anti-gun brigade, it must be very nice to know your STATE supports your Constitutional rights.
Then, you have states like NY, where Cuomo went on a tirade telling people confiscation was a feel good idea. Where would you feel most comfortable living if you were a legal, responsible gun owner? A state rife with threats and uncertainty, or one that passed a law promising to support and defend you?
That is why so many people hope more states step up to the plate. They feel unsure. Uncertain. Insecure. Are you really going to let Obama do this?
Well, Wyoming citizens know, don't they?
The rest of the states? We shall see.
So far...
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 02:53 PM by Libertygal
Originally posted by WatchRider
reply to post by Libertygal
Feel good news with a bullet
I think Idaho, Montana and other free states have already got similar laws in the pipeline.
I know Montana was outspoken on the 10th movement, as well. It would be awesome if you have any more information, if you could hook up some links.
I would be so greatful.
I think, right now, many people are really stressed about all of this. I think Wyoming's action is a step in the right direction in setting some minds at ease. I even saw a remark that with the pendind debt ceiling debates coming, "gun control issues may have to wait till late spring". I can't take the time at the moment as I am in the midst of a 12 hour work cycle, to find the source and quote. IIRC, though, it was Obama.
Anyway, if that's true, it may signal some backpeddaling on the issues coming down the pipe. Sometimes, Washington gets a little overconfident, and perhaps thought they had more support than they find they really do.
I also heard a blurb on the news, "Obama was working closely with lawyers about the executive order..." again no source right now, but perhaps between that and Wyoming's move, soneone got some wake-up medicine.
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 05:01 PM by one4all
reply to post by TKDRL
I am not misled.
Are you aware that it is a right of every Canadian to be able to carry a concealed handgun???Tell the truth now!!!
No you most likely werent even aware of that---you thought it was illegal as most are manipulated into believing.
And I dont mean a handgun permit either,I mean a CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT that allows you ti live with your weapon on your hip.
The facts are my friend that there was and is a current act of collusion taking place in Canada ,an ILLEGAL ACT being committed by the cumulative group of all Firearms officers in all Provinces and territories.
Federal laws allow for every canadian to excercise the right of carrying a concealed handgun,however all the FAOs in ALL the provinces have an informal--ILLEGAL--agreement to not issue them,except under the most ;egally pressing circumstances,this means you need to have 3 DOCUMENTED ATTEMPTS on your very life before you can get a concealed carry permit issued from your Provincial FAO or Firearms Officer-----this is collusional and fraudulent and designed to undermine Federal legeslation.
Yes Canadians have guns but the right is a very tenous one and as we can see by the way the provincial and Civic and Federal governments work together to undermine and defeat Canadians basic rights ,this ability to have and posess firearms cab be taken away at the governments whim and immediatly if they so decree.
If you carry a weapon of any type in many canadian areas for self-defense you will be arrested for carrying a concealed weapon,even a rock or a dull butter knife will get you arrested,we are forced to be defensless and potential victims.
Yes our Farmers are armed and out of 38 million of us how many people are really armed then??Dont believe the stats you read either as they are not accurate,one farmer with ten guns will count as ten gun owners in the stats you will read in reference to how many guns are in Canada pre the population-----just more data manipulation that leads the public to false conclusions.Manipulation.
Ten thousand Chineese troops covertly inserted and armed supported by another ten thousand air dropped from commercial airliners and Canada is a taken country-----we could be taken in 24 hrs.With all strategic points held tight,supperted by tactical nuclear weapons held by Chineese forces in all critical population areas as a deterrant to retaliation by the USA.
Average number of Police in any given major Canadian city is in the hundreds,a team of ten prepared soldiers would wipe out every detatchment within 60 coordinated minutes,leaving the civic Police forces rendered mute.Another set of four two man teams could in that same 60 minutes disable the main power grid,the main Water supply grid,the main Telecommunications grid and the main Transportation hub.
Within possible 120 co-ordinated minutes every major city in Canada would be taken and held via the planting of Tactical nukes as a defense against American intervention,essentially Canada would be held hostage within 2 hours and during that 2 hrs another ten thousand Chineese troops will be dropping out of commercial airliners to support their penetration.
We do NOT have a number of guns distributed around our country that would allow us to even mount civil disobedience,no Wolverines here pal,we are toothless unless all our Farmers rally and head to the big city,ha ha ha ha.
Our only hope is the criminals who might mount an underground defense,but heck they arent decently armed either as there is just no availability here.
Needless to say within 6 hours a massive number of Chineese troops would be arriving via air ,submarine,and Naval vessels,never mind the possibly hundreds of thousands of sleepers likely already planted.I would also imagine that the first hostile action by america would result in a city the size of Winnipeg being obliterated instantly as a token of bad intentions.
Yes,I am misinformed alright,ha ha ha ha.I happen to be one of those Farmers I was mentioning and no most of my Farmer friends would be protecting their families not crusadeing to the city to become martyers.Personally I dont subscribe to peer pressure and i am sure I would gravitate to the epicenter of the action sooner than later.
But no friend we dont really "have guns"here,we are sadly manipulated and forced to be defenceless as a nation.
Remember these words,the next war will not be fought with nukes,it will be a covert war of terrorism as I just outlined and it will be initiated faster than a Blitzkrieg.
Just picture the american fighters shooting down a few Chineese Troop Planes a millisecond before a major city is Vaporised in front of the world via the internet--------I highly doubt there would be any more shootdowns after that and reinforcements would arrive enmasse,remember my words and my warning,Canada has not recieved enough support from the american government and other influential sources in terms of arming the populous---because no one had the foresight i am showing you---Americas weakness is Canada,our population is to spread out and to defenceless,we are the open backdoor and unless we see a MASSIVE push towards arming the people we will remains so,and that will be the avenue taken to defeat the USA in a war.
America has simply planted nukes in Canada as a faster strike deterrant to their opposition and a fallback covered retreat if they are loseing.
America didnt consider the above scenario or thousands just like it,that would render their nukes powerless.
In some american states if a Red Dawn happened ,ha ha ha ha,it would be lights out for anyone who tried to take even a city block,there would be people walking out of their garages towards the Police station under attack spraying deasth all along the way.That is the only chance a country has against a terrorist war as outlines above,a fast heavy definitive cumulative first response from all corners .Literally people running out of their houses armed and loading up their cars with weapons to join the fight immediatly like the freaking Somalis do it.
I am not misled.
Are you aware that it is a right of every Canadian to be able to carry a concealed handgun???Tell the truth now!!!
No you most likely werent even aware of that---you thought it was illegal as most are manipulated into believing.
And I dont mean a handgun permit either,I mean a CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT that allows you ti live with your weapon on your hip.
The facts are my friend that there was and is a current act of collusion taking place in Canada ,an ILLEGAL ACT being committed by the cumulative group of all Firearms officers in all Provinces and territories.
Federal laws allow for every canadian to excercise the right of carrying a concealed handgun,however all the FAOs in ALL the provinces have an informal--ILLEGAL--agreement to not issue them,except under the most ;egally pressing circumstances,this means you need to have 3 DOCUMENTED ATTEMPTS on your very life before you can get a concealed carry permit issued from your Provincial FAO or Firearms Officer-----this is collusional and fraudulent and designed to undermine Federal legeslation.
Yes Canadians have guns but the right is a very tenous one and as we can see by the way the provincial and Civic and Federal governments work together to undermine and defeat Canadians basic rights ,this ability to have and posess firearms cab be taken away at the governments whim and immediatly if they so decree.
If you carry a weapon of any type in many canadian areas for self-defense you will be arrested for carrying a concealed weapon,even a rock or a dull butter knife will get you arrested,we are forced to be defensless and potential victims.
Yes our Farmers are armed and out of 38 million of us how many people are really armed then??Dont believe the stats you read either as they are not accurate,one farmer with ten guns will count as ten gun owners in the stats you will read in reference to how many guns are in Canada pre the population-----just more data manipulation that leads the public to false conclusions.Manipulation.
Ten thousand Chineese troops covertly inserted and armed supported by another ten thousand air dropped from commercial airliners and Canada is a taken country-----we could be taken in 24 hrs.With all strategic points held tight,supperted by tactical nuclear weapons held by Chineese forces in all critical population areas as a deterrant to retaliation by the USA.
Average number of Police in any given major Canadian city is in the hundreds,a team of ten prepared soldiers would wipe out every detatchment within 60 coordinated minutes,leaving the civic Police forces rendered mute.Another set of four two man teams could in that same 60 minutes disable the main power grid,the main Water supply grid,the main Telecommunications grid and the main Transportation hub.
Within possible 120 co-ordinated minutes every major city in Canada would be taken and held via the planting of Tactical nukes as a defense against American intervention,essentially Canada would be held hostage within 2 hours and during that 2 hrs another ten thousand Chineese troops will be dropping out of commercial airliners to support their penetration.
We do NOT have a number of guns distributed around our country that would allow us to even mount civil disobedience,no Wolverines here pal,we are toothless unless all our Farmers rally and head to the big city,ha ha ha ha.
Our only hope is the criminals who might mount an underground defense,but heck they arent decently armed either as there is just no availability here.
Needless to say within 6 hours a massive number of Chineese troops would be arriving via air ,submarine,and Naval vessels,never mind the possibly hundreds of thousands of sleepers likely already planted.I would also imagine that the first hostile action by america would result in a city the size of Winnipeg being obliterated instantly as a token of bad intentions.
Yes,I am misinformed alright,ha ha ha ha.I happen to be one of those Farmers I was mentioning and no most of my Farmer friends would be protecting their families not crusadeing to the city to become martyers.Personally I dont subscribe to peer pressure and i am sure I would gravitate to the epicenter of the action sooner than later.
But no friend we dont really "have guns"here,we are sadly manipulated and forced to be defenceless as a nation.
Remember these words,the next war will not be fought with nukes,it will be a covert war of terrorism as I just outlined and it will be initiated faster than a Blitzkrieg.
Just picture the american fighters shooting down a few Chineese Troop Planes a millisecond before a major city is Vaporised in front of the world via the internet--------I highly doubt there would be any more shootdowns after that and reinforcements would arrive enmasse,remember my words and my warning,Canada has not recieved enough support from the american government and other influential sources in terms of arming the populous---because no one had the foresight i am showing you---Americas weakness is Canada,our population is to spread out and to defenceless,we are the open backdoor and unless we see a MASSIVE push towards arming the people we will remains so,and that will be the avenue taken to defeat the USA in a war.
America has simply planted nukes in Canada as a faster strike deterrant to their opposition and a fallback covered retreat if they are loseing.
America didnt consider the above scenario or thousands just like it,that would render their nukes powerless.
In some american states if a Red Dawn happened ,ha ha ha ha,it would be lights out for anyone who tried to take even a city block,there would be people walking out of their garages towards the Police station under attack spraying deasth all along the way.That is the only chance a country has against a terrorist war as outlines above,a fast heavy definitive cumulative first response from all corners .Literally people running out of their houses armed and loading up their cars with weapons to join the fight immediatly like the freaking Somalis do it.
edit on 11-1-2013 by one4all because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 05:01 PM by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by Libertygal
I am moving back to Wyoming as soon as possible. That's a great place to live at, beautiful views, clean air, almost no traffic even in rush hour. Laws that allow open carry, and most people don't go pooping their pants, or get their panties in a bunch over this fact... Low crime figures because people open carry, and most have firearms...
I have lived in Wyoming, and was involved in state affairs, just like i have been in Florida, and even though there are many good things happening there, trust me, progressives and many liberals are not only trying to change Wyoming as well but have been actively doing it.
Wyoming is rich in many precious metals, and stones, but the problem is that most places that are rich in these gems fall under state parks, and hence it is illegal even to take out one stone (I am trying to make a point by exagerating). What's worse is that progressives/liberals have been allowing more and more companies to lease state lands for large mineral extractions... Yeah, this does give people jobs but when it comes for people to try to strike it rich, that's when "progressives/liberals get their panties in a bunch...
There are so many laws against individuals extracting preciouss metals that you can't sneeze without a progressive/liberal coming down and yelling to the top of their lungs that the world is going to end if you take out anything from state lands...
While this move to solidify the second amentment, and make it illegal for the Feds to enforce their draconian laws is a good step, there are already many draconian laws in states like Wyoming.
There are so many laws in Wyoming that have been introduced by progressive democrats and liberals, that the best state geologist, and one of it's best professors, Dan Hausel, who is author of over 600 books, professional papers, and publications, not to mention that he was the first one to ever draw detailed maps of geologic formations all over Wyoming, got fed up with all the politics of "progress" in Wyoming and left it for good. I know this because we both have had correspondence with each other and discussed "Wyoming problems" in depth.
So if you love liberty/individual rights and want to move to a place like Wyoming, you better do it fast and get involved in it's politics so that "progressives" don't change that state, otherwise there won't be any place left to move into that at least partially defends the U.S. Constitution and your individual rights...
Things might be changing a bit now that Matt Mead is governor of Wyoming, we have yet to see what he does, but I know that "progressives" never stop in their continuous efforts to defecate all over the U.S. Constitution and people's individual rights.
I am moving back to Wyoming as soon as possible. That's a great place to live at, beautiful views, clean air, almost no traffic even in rush hour. Laws that allow open carry, and most people don't go pooping their pants, or get their panties in a bunch over this fact... Low crime figures because people open carry, and most have firearms...
I have lived in Wyoming, and was involved in state affairs, just like i have been in Florida, and even though there are many good things happening there, trust me, progressives and many liberals are not only trying to change Wyoming as well but have been actively doing it.
Wyoming is rich in many precious metals, and stones, but the problem is that most places that are rich in these gems fall under state parks, and hence it is illegal even to take out one stone (I am trying to make a point by exagerating). What's worse is that progressives/liberals have been allowing more and more companies to lease state lands for large mineral extractions... Yeah, this does give people jobs but when it comes for people to try to strike it rich, that's when "progressives/liberals get their panties in a bunch...
There are so many laws against individuals extracting preciouss metals that you can't sneeze without a progressive/liberal coming down and yelling to the top of their lungs that the world is going to end if you take out anything from state lands...
While this move to solidify the second amentment, and make it illegal for the Feds to enforce their draconian laws is a good step, there are already many draconian laws in states like Wyoming.
There are so many laws in Wyoming that have been introduced by progressive democrats and liberals, that the best state geologist, and one of it's best professors, Dan Hausel, who is author of over 600 books, professional papers, and publications, not to mention that he was the first one to ever draw detailed maps of geologic formations all over Wyoming, got fed up with all the politics of "progress" in Wyoming and left it for good. I know this because we both have had correspondence with each other and discussed "Wyoming problems" in depth.
So if you love liberty/individual rights and want to move to a place like Wyoming, you better do it fast and get involved in it's politics so that "progressives" don't change that state, otherwise there won't be any place left to move into that at least partially defends the U.S. Constitution and your individual rights...
Things might be changing a bit now that Matt Mead is governor of Wyoming, we have yet to see what he does, but I know that "progressives" never stop in their continuous efforts to defecate all over the U.S. Constitution and people's individual rights.
edit on 11-1-2013 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 05:27 PM by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by sageturkey
You are right. It is normal weather in Wyoming to have 40-50 mph winds, if you don't have a heavy vehicle it can be overturned by sudden wind
gusts.
Yes Wyoming is a dangerous place as well because nature is not kind, and if you don't respect the power of nature, and are aware that it can harm you and even kill you at any time, you might not survive long in Wyoming.
I have driven through whiteouts in Wyoming where you can barely see the road and many times you can't see it at all. Tourists have been found dead during winter, and summer as well because they weren't properly prepared and were not aware of how dangerous nature can be.
If you move and live in a place like Wyoming make sure you have plenty of water, and some food, flares and other signal items etc, as well as warmers/heat packs for winter, some extra clothing, etc in your car, as well as your house.
Of course, also make sure you are armed.
If you find yourself in the company of a bear, or even a moose, and other wild animals don't think that
talking about "progress" is going to stop them from using you as a punching meat bag, and don't think either that a 9 mm pistol is going to stop such
animals, it will only make them angrier.
You are right. It is normal weather in Wyoming to have 40-50 mph winds, if you don't have a heavy vehicle it can be overturned by sudden wind
gusts. Yes Wyoming is a dangerous place as well because nature is not kind, and if you don't respect the power of nature, and are aware that it can harm you and even kill you at any time, you might not survive long in Wyoming.
I have driven through whiteouts in Wyoming where you can barely see the road and many times you can't see it at all. Tourists have been found dead during winter, and summer as well because they weren't properly prepared and were not aware of how dangerous nature can be.
If you move and live in a place like Wyoming make sure you have plenty of water, and some food, flares and other signal items etc, as well as warmers/heat packs for winter, some extra clothing, etc in your car, as well as your house.
Of course, also make sure you are armed.
If you find yourself in the company of a bear, or even a moose, and other wild animals don't think that
talking about "progress" is going to stop them from using you as a punching meat bag, and don't think either that a 9 mm pistol is going to stop such
animals, it will only make them angrier. edit on 11-1-2013 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 05:51 PM by sageturkey
reply to post by one4all
Thanks for the reply, but are you sure that you replied to the correct person? I have never had any dealings with our law enforcement personel here other than reporting a theft - and they were very professional in their work.
ETA - I see that you've deleted your post, figured that you must have mis-directed that one.
Thanks for the reply, but are you sure that you replied to the correct person? I have never had any dealings with our law enforcement personel here other than reporting a theft - and they were very professional in their work.
ETA - I see that you've deleted your post, figured that you must have mis-directed that one.
edit on 11-1-2013 by sageturkey because: Courtesy is king
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 06:02 PM by one4all
reply to post by sageturkey
My apologies,I zigged when I should have zagged.
Dont let them infringe on your gun ownership and rights--make no concessions and go on the legal offensive immediatly ,dont even negotiate a single thing--push for more.
My best wishes to all in Wyoming who are asserting their rights,there is support for you all over the world not just in America.
My apologies,I zigged when I should have zagged.
Dont let them infringe on your gun ownership and rights--make no concessions and go on the legal offensive immediatly ,dont even negotiate a single thing--push for more.
My best wishes to all in Wyoming who are asserting their rights,there is support for you all over the world not just in America.
reply posted on 11-1-2013 @ 06:08 PM by sageturkey
Originally posted by one4all
reply to post by sageturkey
My apologies,I zigged when I should have zagged.
Dont let them infringe on your gun ownership and rights--make no concessions and go on the legal offensive immediatly ,dont even negotiate a single thing--push for more.
My best wishes to all in Wyoming who are asserting their rights,there is support for you all over the world not just in America.
Very kind words and oh, so true. I've seen so many negative comments in these threads from others abroad regarding the U.S.A. and it's most refreshing to know that not everyone in Canada thinks of us as un-civilized, selfish cretins and 'cowboys' as they tag us (this is The Cowboy State BTW) for wanting to preserve the basic foundations of our country. Now if we could only get the same love from the UK
ETA - Food for thought with a few facts for an appetizer:
Even though every law-abiding citizen has had the right to open-carry for a number of years here - more recently it's been changed to allow those same citizens to carry a concealed weapon, our homicide rates are almost utopian. In 2010 for example, depending on which source you reference - Wyoming had a total of either 8 or 16 homicides. About the same amount that large metropolitan cities with very strict firearms laws have in 1 day. That's either 1.4 or 2.8 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants depending on the source, not all of which were commited with a firearm.
Source
I don't claim to have the answer as to why it's so low, is it that a larger majority of the citizens ARE armed? Is it that folks here respect the value of human life more? Is it that we're not all crammed-together here like sardines in a can thus imparting more civility to us little fishies? Really can't answer that one, but I think that the facts speak for themselves.
Thanks for your support
edit on 11-1-2013 by sageturkey because: SP and adds
edit on 11-1-2013 by sageturkey because:
More
Update...Canada Couple Wins Right To Grow Vegetables On Front Lawn...Case Closed!
Posted 16 days ago with 25 member flags
Posted 16 days ago with 25 member flags
We argue about Healthcare, meanwhile, the Elephant laughs (pls read!)
Posted 13 days ago with 25 member flags
Posted 13 days ago with 25 member flags
A new country in North America? What do Canadians and Americans make of this?
Posted 9 days ago with 22 member flags
Posted 9 days ago with 22 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
18-year-old’s breakthrough invention can recharge phones in seconds
Science & Technology: 19 minutes ago
Science & Technology: 19 minutes ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
4 Fireballs with Same Heading Spotted Over U.S. in last 24 Hours
General Conspiracies: 14 hours ago, 36 flags
General Conspiracies: 14 hours ago, 36 flags
Women don't like quiet males. (They prefer alpha males who are all bullies)
Relationships: 16 hours ago, 21 flags
Relationships: 16 hours ago, 21 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Women don't like quiet males. (They prefer alpha males who are all bullies)
Relationships: 16 hours ago, 206 replies
Relationships: 16 hours ago, 206 replies
4 Fireballs with Same Heading Spotted Over U.S. in last 24 Hours
General Conspiracies: 14 hours ago, 44 replies
General Conspiracies: 14 hours ago, 44 replies
Confess here! what music moves you that you won't let people know you love?
General Chit Chat: 12 hours ago, 35 replies
General Chit Chat: 12 hours ago, 35 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.408 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.408 seconds
