It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Gordi The Drummer
I'm interested to know if any US citizens were telling the UK citizens what they should do when their guns were being taken away.
Do you recall the US or any other countries suggested to the UK residents that they'd prefer it if they were unarmed?edit on 10-1-2013 by Afterthought because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Maxatoria
I'm sure if the founders had seen what would of happened they of probably added a "but no guns for those who are nuttier than squirrel poo" as thats the real problem its not guns its the wrong people getting their hands on the guns and until they can work out some sort of nutter filter to gun ownership there will be people going out and wiping out large quantities of people and nothing they do/try and ban like large cap clips etc will really change the fact that when person x flips and if they have to carry 5 clips or 500 clips to do what they want it'll happen
So really gun control should be people looking out for people and stopping them from doing stupid stuff before it causes stupid numbers of dead people
Originally posted by Jykan
Originally posted by roughycannon
Bad time to make a thread like this 20 minutes after another high school shooting...
Why is it a bad time? The OP isn't condoning shootings.
Originally posted by ruderalis1
...If multiple people broke into your house...Lets say 3 of em. Do you believe that you would be able to defend yourself againt all 3? If 3 people broke into my place and all I had was a bat I think my chance of defending myself successfully against all 3 is a lot more slim than if I bust out an AR-15 or Shotgun.
Im no pushover either and I'd give them all I got. But you gotta admit that defending your castle becomes a lot harder with less tools
until they can work out some sort of nutter filter
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Gordi The Drummer
Thanks for your insightful reply, Gordi.
I didn't realize that UK residents could apply for a gun license. It makes sense that farmers would need them in the event they had to protect their livestock from predators and it's always good fun picking off rats.
The main problem in the US is that they have sanctions put in place so that those who shouldn't have guns have a more difficult time getting them, but the officials aren't following their own regulations. For example, in Florida, the State received a 'D' for not following their laws on who they approved could carry a concealed weapon. If someone has been institutionalized for mental problems, they aren't allowed to own a gun, yet they approve their applications. If the States would be more careful and follow their own rules, we might not have so many problems. As usual, the responsible people are going to suffer for the ones who aren't able to control themselves.edit on 10-1-2013 by Afterthought because: (no reason given)edit on 10-1-2013 by Afterthought because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kram09
reply to post by Maxatoria
until they can work out some sort of nutter filter
Yes but who defines what a nutter is? Half the people on this site could be classed as nutters....
Originally posted by jimmiec
The government believes it has reduced the chance of being a victim of crime from 40% to 22% between 1995 and 2008,[5] although conservative figures suggest that the United Kingdom has the second highest overall crime rate in Europe, and that violent attacks have increased by 77% between 1997 and 2009.
I dunno. It does not look like banning guns has decreased violent crime in the UK. It looks to me like violent crime has gone through the roof. If the criminal knew you might have a gun i bet violent crime rates would go down instead of up. As far as banning rifles it is a little known fact that in 2011 less than 400 deaths were attributed to rifles. Which is what they want to ban. If a mentally ill person wants to kill people they will find a way irregardless of a weapons ban. Mental health is the real problem. Not guns.
Originally posted by Gordi The Drummer
I totally agree that the UK's violent crime stats are shockingly high, AND that they are probably much higher than they would be if firearms were much more readily available in the UK.
Originally posted by Jykan
Originally posted by Gordi The Drummer
I totally agree that the UK's violent crime stats are shockingly high, AND that they are probably much higher than they would be if firearms were much more readily available in the UK.
This may be true...or maybe not. The fact is though, you cannot argue that it is easier to subdue someone with a knife or a bat than it is someone with a gun.
How long do you think it would realistically take for your average person to comprehend what is happening, nevermind react in a shooting? In that time how many people could a man with a gun intent on killing people kill?
Now, take a man with a knife and ask the same questions.
As mentioned previously I am not against gun ownership, I just think people need to be responsible for one another.