posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 09:13 AM
Gun confiscation at this point is relegated to the realms of science fiction. Not gonna happen. If the government really wanted to disarm the public,
they could have done so with ease, many times over. Guns are useless without ammunition. I won't go into it here, but there are any number of ways to
skin this cat.
IMHO, they are playing a game of division, and reverse psychology. Guns are a hot button in this country that causes a knee jerk reaction from the
public. Threaten them, and gun sales go through the roof. Threaten to raise fuel prices, or a fuel shortage, and sales jump dramatically.
It seems to me, they are actually doing the opposite. Obama has been the best president for gun ownership to ever sit in the white house. That man has
been a one man sales team for the whole industry. The question we should be asking is...Why?
Why has he been so good for gun and ammunition sales. Why is he (intentionally, imo) accomplishing the opposite of the supposed desired effect? I
could be wrong, but from my perspective, Obama is the most pro gun president I've ever seen. But you'd be hard pressed to convince anyone of that from
what appears to be his stance. Here again, I must ask why?
Somewhere there is a benefit to our "glorious leaders", or gun sales wouldn't have been so damned good the past several years. And it isn't all about
the money on this one.
edit on 1/10/2013 by Klassified because: spell-ing