It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by esteay812
reply to post by Frank Warren
Hi Frank! Glad to see you here and thanks for the information you're sharing.
I've always thought of myself as pretty much an average room temperature type of person. I always thought that, if a corporation wanted to spend millions of dollars to research what the average American thinks about their product, they could save a lot of time and money by just asking me, lol.
I mention that, because I think my initial perspective is a pretty good indicator of what many average people think about the 'Phoenix Lights'.
Point is, being average, I had no idea - at all - that there were any other reports or sightings of a craft, aside from the flare drop sightings and video.
I was very surprised to learn that the 10p reports were not the initial sightings that evening. Once I figured that out, I was pretty much sold on the idea that something was really in the sky that night and there was a concerted effort to muddy the waters with a 10p flare drop.
Realizing the initial reports had intentionally been hidden in most of the documentaries and reports made me feel even more suspicious about the whole situation.
So, as an average person, I know there are a lot of people out there who have no idea that there were earlier sightings reported that spanned many miles and covered several states. I think a lot of people believe the event was localized to the skies above the city, as seen in nearly every single cable documentary available.
I do hope new reports, like FrznFenix, will help more people realize that the sightings were not localized and they describe seeing something much different than flares falling slowly from the sky.
I have already learned quite a bit from the activity here and I hope to learn even more, so, Thanks Again for joining the thread!
edit on 15-1-2013 by esteay812 because: (no reason given)
Steve Blonder here Frank. Yes, every year the story gets rehashed so I'll keep my reply short and succinct. There were a tremendous amount of politics that occurred between the two MUFON camps (Hamilton and King vs. Motzer).
Hamilton left MUFON over Motzer hijacking the narrative.
As you also point out, there was a false choice strawman put out that said - If the Lights were in front of the mountain it must be UFOs, If behind the mountain they had to be flares. I personally never held to that false choice because of the previous nights' activity which showed the lights in front of and behind the Estrella range. Jim D. hung his case on the front of the mountain position which was proved false by the various studies you mentioned. I spoke to Jim after the interview and he assures me there were edits that took his comments out of context and that all he reversed was opening himself to the possibility that they were flares because his "in front of the mountain" thesis did not hold up. He has never declared the lights as flares.
Tom King was shut out of much of the front of the mountain narrative.
His quote refers to Rairden - not Proctor I believe and his mileage is not accurate. He does explain he was at a higher altitude which put the Lights very close to ridgeline that is 2,000 ft. lower than Krzsston's ridgeline which he doesn't address. Basically Tom decided to throw the entire "front of mountain" narrative under the bus as it's been explained to me by those involved.
Bruce Maccabee never triangulated my position which was as you know the closest to the Lights. He wrote an addendum that tried to address this but he admittedly used an Orb that appeared a few minutes before the mass sighting which sent Hamilton and King to their cars for the their filming equipment - climb back up the stairs to catch the tail-end of earlier light which was why they were perfectly prepared to catch the full array.
I worked with Dr. Maccabee and Jim D. a couple of years ago which led to him revising his Triangulation reports to move the lights even further south because he was relying on the Jan. 1998 sighting coordinates of Rairden. He removed his reliance which puts his current position closer to Tucson than to Phoenix. There were no reports of the array in Tucson nor Gila Bend (10:00 pm) ufoupdateslist.com... also there were discrepancies in burn color of flares vs. the Lights taped. Dr.M still refused to triangulate my position and had me send all documentation to Marc DAntonio who has done nothing with it.
Finally - I think everyone would have to admit that it's one hell of a coincidence that I witnessed the same Lights 4 nights in a row. Even if we pretend that March 13th's Lights were flares, that leaves 3 previous nights of unanswered UFO sightings that don't seem to matter in the scheme of things which brings me to the point I want to make sure I'm clear about. I have never felt the need to dismiss the 8:30 sightings - evidence or not, nor to hog the "glamor" surrounding the 10:00 pm event. For some reason you and others feel that the only way to get to the truth of the earlier sighting is to invalidate the later one. One day someone will write a book on the politics of this sighting.
Christians will not immediately need to renounce their faith in God “simply on the basis of the reception of [this] new, unexpected information of a religious character from extraterrestrial civilizations.” However, once the “religious content” originating from outside the earth “has been verified” they will have to conduct “a re-reading [of the Gospel] inclusive of the new data…”
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by mikefortson
THANKS MUCH, Mike for your msg here.
I saw/heard your presentation at a well attended SW conference several years ago and was impressed then with your sincerity and objectivity.
1. I'm curious how much you've been hassled by the powers that be given your visibility.
2. I'm also curious how many/what percentage of your associates and relatives have come around to your view over the years compared to initially.
3. Also, a particular curiosity--what's your take on Stan Romanek's case? I think he was at the same conference you were at [deliberately not mentioning the location].
4. Another question . . . What have you felt about the last year's incremental escalations in such goings on?
5. And this increasing sort of thing out of the Vatican?
www.raidersnewsupdate.com...
Christians will not immediately need to renounce their faith in God “simply on the basis of the reception of [this] new, unexpected information of a religious character from extraterrestrial civilizations.” However, once the “religious content” originating from outside the earth “has been verified” they will have to conduct “a re-reading [of the Gospel] inclusive of the new data…”
6. IT SEEMS TO ME that the "Phoenix lights' event was a marked escalation in the planned . . . scenarios.
7. And that the emerging stuff from the Vatican is another level of a marked escalation.
8. Can you see the two fitting any particular strategy, scenario, goal? If so, what?
9. Otherwise, what do we have? Increased night sightings with SOME increase in dramatic daylight sightings? To what end? How much more of an incremental escalation of such can we have before there's nothing left to escalate any further?
10. If we are able to conceptualize a graph line . . . a curve sloping more and more steeply up with each incremental increase in presented info/displayed delusion [not psychological delusion in terms of not being real but delusion in the sense that the demonstrations and assertions about them are not 100% accurate. i.e. that the critters are actually NOT nice or that the good-cop/bad-cop charade they are being cast in toward forcing a world government on the planet is not the whole story]
11. So visualize a curve . . . where the peak ends up with fairly brazen overt demonstrations in broad daylight . . . and where the graph reaches 90* vertical just before such brazen demonstrations . . . what could we guesstimate the curve is roughly at currently?
12. If we start the curve horizontal in 1947 . . . and hypothesize the end-point 90* with purportedly 'full' demonstrations on the nightly news with the craft in broad daylight and/or the critters being interviewed . . . what percentage of the curve could we guess to be left?