posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 03:36 AM
pope Francis scheduled Oct 13, 2013 consecration of the WORLD to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Let remember pope JP2 already consecrated the world on May 13, 1984. No Russia mentioned explicitly.
The re-consecration of the world, not Russia, revokes big questions back on the table.
First, did "Russia consecration" requirement ever exist in the heavenly message, or is it a fabrication of Vatican inner circles around 1941 when it
was released to public, long after the October revolution of 1917 and already during ongoing terrible WW2 with Hitler and Stalin on both sides? Did
the Vatican side at that moment for political reasons? As much as the "official third secret" revealed in 2000 is not the real third secret?
Second, if "Russia consecration" requirement indeed is authentic and coming from heaven not from men, then why don't they simply do it? Why
doesn't pope Francis consecrate Russia instead of the world? Why should the pope miss it again, after so much speculation, fear, and luck out at end
the Cold War? We could be in nuclear ruins right now. Perhaps it is of no concern for those in position? Never coming era of peace 23 years after the
so called "fall of communism" puts reliable questions about the authenticity of both JP2 consecration in 1984 and the follow ups approvals issued by
Lucia, still alive at that time. May be all was faked.
Third, what is the real content of the so called Third secret? The content revealed in 2000 is AT BEST a vision received on another date, not on 13
July 1917. At worst it is a complete forgery with different handwriting of a different "Lucia". On July 13, 1917 the 3 children received all 3
parts of a text called subsequently secret part 1,2,3. The 3rd is a piece within that text, not a separate thing, and never officially revealed. Some
people in position (as Cardinal Ottaviani) said the "Neues Europa" text is close enough to it. It speaks of a horrific event in which oceans become
steam and millions die from one moment to another. JP2 confirmed that indirectly in his talk to bishops in Fulda. Please refer to internet for exact
quotes or visit one of my threads on Fatima by simply clicking on my profile name>authored threads.
What is it that the Vatican is still afraid to tell the faithful AND the WORLD? I can tell the magic word but it will make many fatimists angry at me.
I told it in other threads. It is the only thing that is still not publicly discussed.
And frankly there isn't much discussion, apart of this and similar threads, as it should be expected before such a monumental event as consecration
of the world/Russia. I saw some purely catholic forums do indeed "discuss" but I doubt of level of free conscience of expression if something must
be tied up not only with dogmas but with rues that never were a dogma. It is rare a catholic to speak freely in public. Then who will say the truth?
Publications of non-catholics like Petrus Romanus and Exo Vaticana? Frankly I learn from them more than from what is branded catholic freee views. Not
agreeing with them, but they say things that the catholics don't dare to say. Pity. Let conclude with that, nobody is obliged to believe Fatima in
order to be saved.