Gun Control in America. YES!

Originally posted by canucks555
The 2nd amendment states that you can use weapons.
It doesn't state which ones, so in other words Obamy could ban everything except Rimfire rifles and the amendment wouldn't be compromised

That's why the public opinion (in the real world, not on this forum) supports some type of gun control

Not according to Heller vs. D.C.

Originally posted by canucks555
The 2nd amendment states that you can use weapons.

It states "Arms", not weapons.

Originally posted by canucks555
It doesn't state which ones, so in other words Obamy could ban everything except Rimfire rifles and the amendment wouldn't be compromised

It also states "Shall not infringe".
So no. Legally he can't.

Originally posted by canucks555
That's why the public opinion (in the real world, not on this forum) supports some type of gun control

No, no it doesn't.
Unless you think that public opinion is the MSM, Liberal Progressive Politicians, Anti-Gun groups (Which are not that large as a whole) and a handful of citizens that fear an inanimate object.

SO.................No, it is not public opinion.

Thanks for chiming in with your non-counting opinion.

Thanks for chiming in with your non-counting opinion.

Amendment was crafted when Muzzle loaders were the norm. Not AR-15s.

-You must be pissed that you can't purchase a 40mm Bofors antiaircraft gun...Do you find that to be an infringement of your rights?
Where do you draw the line (as to what an American civilian can buy and use?) As in you, good sir.

Originally posted by canucks555
Thanks for chiming in with your non-counting opinion.

Amendment was crafted when Muzzle loaders were the norm. Not AR-15s.

-You must be pissed that you can't purchase a 40mm Bofors antiaircraft gun...Do you find that to be an infringement of your rights?
Where do you draw the line? As in you, good sir.

And? When the first amendment was created, they didnt have facebook and twitter. Doesnt mean free speech laws are nullified. Nice try though.

Click here for more information.

Originally posted by canucks555

Amendment was crafted when Muzzle loaders were the norm. Not AR-15s.

Shows just how little you know about US history. There were repeating firearms at that time.
Also, there is no provision stating "muzzle loader". It states "Arms", very simple.

Originally posted by canucks555
-You must be pissed that you can't purchase a 40mm Bofors antiaircraft gun...Do you find that to be an infringement of your rights?

That whole "Arms" thing defeats your crap logic.
It is an infringement, as defined by the 2nd Amendment.

Originally posted by canucks555
Where do you draw the line (as to what an American civilian can buy and use?) As in you, good sir.

What ever "Arms" are used by the military by law is to be accessible by the Militia, which is the people.
But, you go ahead and banter on with your un-counted Non-US citizen opinion.

Mad you gotta get a big kick out of these progressives.Epic revisionists in history,Some say they are ready to die if robbed and that we must "surrender".
How will these kids react when the guns are gone their messiah starts a draft,this time including girls,then drops their butts in a conflict to badly lose so the US itself must surrender.
Has 9/11 changed anything in your lives,if the US doesn't matter it shouldn't have.
If you want to be protected it won't work,protect yourselves,we will.