posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 12:49 PM
These days, we now are seemingly always doing “battle” with liberals on various forums and social sites so I wanted anyone reading this, to be
better armed. One thing I have not seen clarified in the argument on “gun control” ,
I have addressed below –
“In the hands of the military or police only” – This little phrase is spreading like wildfire in the media and in the Left’s agenda to
synergize their goal of disarming America. Are they under the impression that our military service men and women come from another planet and are
maybe automaton droids that have no emotion or impulse and can “suddenly appear” during an act of crime or murder and save the victims? How about
our police personnel, the same?
These human beings are subject to the same freedoms and challenges that the rest of us are. The military and police are our friends, family and
neighbors. The argument then leans to “training”. Is it not the right and best choice for any man or woman to learn everything that they can to
not only survive, but flourish in a free nation?
Training is available to anyone, anytime. And it should be the agenda of the Right to encourage the expansion of weapons training and hand to hand
combat for sport and for defense at all costs. Most people that spend time at gun ranges and training events are surrounded not by “militia” or
“military personnel”, but by average American citizens.
So, the weapons should be in whose hands? All of the possible leverage, in any life or death situation should be with whom, exactly? In what way, is
that a good idea? In what strange and distant version of Earth is it a "good idea" to remove powerful weapons from a good and hardworking people?
That's just it, right? These acts are not done by a "good and hardworking people" by and large. But good and hardworking people can celebrate their
efforts with Freedom.
Punish the many, for the acts of a few? And you liberals are TEACHERS, Doctors and Lawyers? That model doesn't work in ANY scenario. Hence, the
ridiculous claim that criminalizing over 140 million + people for their free interest to buy whatever weapons they want will never stop mass
The case for "The Gun Show Loophole", "High Capacity Mags" and "Military Style Assault Rifles" is simply put, here. The events that have enraged
the nation and call for change would not have been changed by any ADDITIONAL legislation or Executive Orders:
- The guns used were not purchased at gun shows, by criminals.
- 10 round magazines in an armed theatre, mall or school can be "swapped out" within seconds, allowing the shooter to continue any spree, easily. A
ban on "high cap mags" will not prevent truckloads of manure from blowing up Federal buildings, etc.
- "Military Style Assault Rifles" are not accessible to the general public. They require a Class 3 Tax Stamp and extensive registration and
background check. They operate at "Full Auto" or "Burst Fire" or are shortened or modified in a series of existing regulations. Not since the
early 90's has an individual (American citizen) even so much as brandished one of these weapons in an act of "mass killing".
How many people died during the Spanish Inquisition? How many by "assault rifles"? How many people died during the attacks on 9/11? 9 TERRORISTS
SHOULD HAVE, BY THE ARMED PEOPLE ON THE PLANES, no more.
The individual was given rights by God, an outside force, not to ever be confused by government. Even if that individual chooses not to believe in
God, the system is still perfect. They are not required to and yet they get the same individual rights as designed into the Declaration of
Independence! The argument falls into the Constitution, alone, too often!
The Declaration of Independence clearly shows that the life-blood and purpose of this nation is to support one’s initiative and drive to be more and
have more, without the hand of tyranny to take it and “re-distribute it”.
47% of this nation…I mean 51% (after the election results)...Believes it is better to have a government take care of them, than to have to go out
and get their goals accomplished on their own. This would not be quite as worrisome to the free-thinker, if simultaneously they were NOT trying to
disarm those of us that make the cogs turn and feed the beast.
“Why do you need that”? – Great question! Why does a soccer player need a ball, “regulation size”? Why do cars NEED to go over a 100 miles
per hour? Why, WHY, WHY??? – The free thinking, non-criminal, average American can buy what they want and the entrepreneurs can build and sell what
they want. Bigger, louder and more exciting are all adjectives used to describe the average man’s inherent “interest” in the things he plays
with. All innuendos aside, whether it’s a soccer ball, a backyard fire or a firearm –Safety, education and respect to all of it, for what it is,
is where we start making change. Starting a fight, telling someone what kind of ANYTHING they can have, you will loose.