posted on Jan, 9 2013 @ 06:37 PM
reply to post by CthulhuMythos
Originally posted by CthulhuMythos
I would say 'no' so that I would not be forced to say, kill someone or something bad, but if asked a question I would say like to go to a party,
which I would, I could say either.. 'don't ask, just tell me to go' or 'I wouldn't say no' or 'no I wouldn't like, I would love to'
The point was living and agreeing to everything ("yes" to everything) or living and rejecting everything ("no" to everything)
Say, no, I wouldn't like to , I would love to - is still agreeing.
reply to post by ~Lucidity
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
"Will you help the hungry?" No, because I already do and will continue to do so if and when I choose to.
If someone is asking for help, you would have to reject them if you were forced to say "no" all the time; but if you were forced to say "yes" all
the time, you would have to keep helping whoever need help to the best of your ability.
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
And that if a FORCE was being applied that it obviously is not benevolent in its agenda to wish to attempt to produce conscious entangle technology
upon the mind of a developing CREATOR Creation..
There are forces such as gravity. I don't think that is evil... or is it?
If Creator wanted to construct a world of beings that are fully saying yes to everything in life and fully saying no to everything in life BUT they
get to choose which side to be on... I wonder how that would all play out?
reply to post by LesMisanthrope
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
reply to post by arpgme
To life I would always say 'Yes.'
To someone I would always say 'No.'
I obey life. I disobey someones.
The conditions of the original post is that you would always have to agree (say "yes") to whatever is happening in life whether by circumstances or
another person versus always disagreeing (saying no) under these circumstances which would you rather have is this is the way life had to be lived?