What really happened to the Pharaohs, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 10-1-2013 @ 07:57 AM by Ophiuchus 13
More recent


Inanna
can be considered the most prominent female deity in ancient Mesopotamia.[1] As early as the Uruk period (ca. 4000–3100 BC), Inanna was associated with the city of Uruk. The famous Uruk Vase (found in a deposit of cult objects of the Uruk III period) depicts a row of naked men carrying various objects, bowls, vessels, and baskets of farm produce, and bringing sheep and goats, to a female figure facing the ruler. This figure was ornately dressed for a divine marriage, and attended by a servant. The female figure holds the symbol of the two twisted reeds of the doorpost, signifying Inanna behind her, while the male figure holds a box and stack of bowls, the later cuneiform sign signifying En, or high priest of the temple. Especially in the Uruk period, the symbol of a ring-headed doorpost is associated with Inanna.[1]

Seal impressions from the Jemdet Nasr period (ca. 3100–2900 BC) show a fixed sequence of city symbols including those of Ur, Larsa, Zabalam, Urum, Arina, and probably Kesh. It is likely that this list reflects the report of contributions to Inanna at Uruk from cities supporting her cult. A large number of similar sealings were found from the slightly later Early Dynastic I phase at Ur, in a slightly different order, combined with the rosette symbol of Inanna, that were definitely used for this purpose. They had been used to lock storerooms to preserve materials set aside for her cult.[2] Inanna's primary temple of worship was the Eanna, located in Uruk (c.f. Worship).
Etymology

Inanna's name derives from Queen of Heaven (Sumerian: nin-anna). The Cuneiform sign of Inanna (Cuneiform: 𒈹); however, is not a ligature of the signs lady (Sumerian: nin; Cuniform: 𒊩𒌆 SAL.TUG2) and sky (Sumerian: an; Cuneiform: 𒀭 AN).[3] These difficulties have led some early Assyriologists to suggest that originally Inanna may have been a Proto-Euphratean goddess, possibly related to the Hurrian mother goddess Hannahannah, accepted only latterly into the Sumerian pantheon, an idea supported by her youthfulness, and that, unlike the other Sumerian divinities, at first she had no sphere of responsibilities [4] The view that there was a Proto-Euphratean substrate language in Southern Iraq before Sumerian is not widely accepted by modern Assyriologists.[5]


Marduk (Sumerian spelling in Akkadian: AMAR.UTU 𒀫𒌓 "solar calf"; perhaps from MERI.DUG; Biblical Hebrew מְרֹדַךְ Merodach; Greek Μαρδοχαῖος,[1] Mardochaios) was the Babylonian name of a late-generation god from ancient Mesopotamia and patron deity of the city of Babylon, who, when Babylon became the political center of the Euphrates valley in the time of Hammurabi (18th century BCE), started to slowly rise to the position of the head of the Babylonian pantheon, a position he fully acquired by the second half of the second millennium BCE.

According to The Encyclopedia of Religion, the name Marduk was probably pronounced Marutuk. The etymology of the name Marduk is conjectured as derived from amar-Utu ("bull calf of the sun god Utu"). The origin of Marduk's name may reflect an earlier genealogy, or have had cultural ties to the ancient city of Sippar (whose god was Utu, the sun god), dating back to the third millennium BCE.[2]

In the perfected system of astrology, the planet Jupiter was associated with Marduk by the Hammurabi period.[3]

edit on 1/10/13 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 10-1-2013 @ 08:08 AM by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Lazarus Short





They were turned into mummies, and buried, except for the Pharaoh of the exodus, who was drowned and lost.


Buried where exactly?



reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 05:45 PM by Noinden
reply to post by rkingpin



Using the Bible as a reliable source of history is a very dangerous practice! There are plenty of historical works over Egypt, that are verifiable out there.


reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 06:39 PM by LUXUS
reply to post by thePharaoh



We are not here to listen to an afrocentric Egypt history lesson from an afrocentric, there are websites for that type of pseudohistorical trash where you can play make believe with other afrocentrisc who want to claim that the ancient Egyptians are actually subSaharans. The ancient egyptians were and still today are not Nubian/ kush-ites. The ancient egyptians were very careful to insure they never depicted themselves in art as being similar to those from kush.

How many forts did the egyptians build in the south to keep the Nubian/kush-ites out????

These are your kush-ite/Nubians, clearly not Egyptians

edit on 13-1-2013 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-1-2013 @ 07:15 PM by thePharaoh
reply to post by LUXUS



PHARAOHS NEVER USED THE TERM NUBIAN


AND WHY THE HELL DID THEY DELETE MY MESSAGE AND LEAVE YOUR RACIST RANTS UP


A FLOOD OF NUBIANS AND PLAGUE???????????????????????????????????????????????????????


BLACK IMAGES DOES NOT MEAN NUBIAN

THERES THE
LAND OF PUNT
LAND OF KUSH
AND THE NILE PROVONCES KHEMET


THEBANS ARE NUBIAN
KU#ES ARE NUBIAN
LAND OF PUNTG ARE NUBIAN
THE NILE PROVINCES ARE NUBIAN


the pharaohs never labeled black people nubian...the greco romans did


NUB MEANS GOLD......WHY CALL A BLACK PERSON GOLD???????????



19TH CENTURY RACIST RETARDED REMARKS


and the mod that wiped mine and left his....good work...now we know each other

peace


reply posted on 14-1-2013 @ 06:30 AM by LUXUS
reply to post by thePharaoh




Really! so its racist to disagree with your view of history, how would modern day Egyptians feel about you trying to change the racial characteristics of their ancestors in order so that you may feel you have some connection to those achievements.

See the problem is that these images are often accompanied with hieroglyphics which explain the images (kinda like a story book) and they are identified as being from kush (what people today call Nubia). Mainstream Egyptology agree that the images are Kush-ites, you want us to believe they got it wrong and you are correct???
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



More Mysterious Nazca Lines From Space
  Posted 6 days ago with 124 member flags
The Aztec and Norse god of war are both missing one hand.
  Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags
63,000-Year-Old Modern Human Skull Found in Laos
  Posted 18 days ago with 38 member flags
Multiple Human Species Were Likely The Norm
  Posted 11 days ago with 37 member flags
The Sumerian \'Flood-Storm\' weapon.
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags