It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
For all the people buying into Piers Morgan's numbers, here is the dissection of the figures on a global scale.
Is UK really all that Piers claims its cracked up to be?
Ben Swann breaks it down for you.
www.fox19.com...
edit on 8-1-2013 by eLPresidente because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sajuek
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Are you SURE UK's definition of crime envelops more crimes than the U.S. does? Where did you get this information from?
And second, why does the EU name UK as the second most violent country in the union?
Violent crime in the UK also includes things like vandalism, threat of violence which can be just cases of people having shouting matches in the streets at night. In the evening, most the pubs and clubs in just about every British town open up - there's a strong nightlife here wherever you go compared to the states. Because of powers vested into the Police where they can ask people to move along for being drunk & disorderly or otherwise unpleasant and people who refuse to move, return the area or are picked up for being D&D are booked as violent crime.
Although as long as you don't swear at or swing for your arresting officer you'll probably just get a slap on the wrist and a night in the cells.
I would agree that the UK is probably the most violent member out of North and West Europe however, perhaps Ireland excluded. But that said, these are just about all non-gun owning countries too.
As for UK being the second most violent country in the Union, it's total nonsense. Please keep in mind that the Union includes countries which include Italy, Spain, Greece, Poland, Romania all of whom have very corrupt police forces and under-reporting of crimes is a serious issue as well as again, reporting methods being very different.
Despite public perception exacerbated by the Daily Mail and other sensationalist newspapers as well as the human condition to assume yesterday was better than today; there is no crime wave. Almost every violent crime is at a 20+ year low even with reporting techniques and people-police communication being better than ever.
UK Policemen don't carry guns and it's not considered to be a particularly dangerous job and it's not because there is a violent crime problem.
Quoting UN statistics, in 2011 the US had a murder rate of 4.8 people per 100,000 persons. The UK had a murder rate of 1.2 people per 100,000 persons, four times less. How Americans seem to think they have ground to stand on when arguing that the UK, let alone other anti-gun owning states in the EU are less safe is simply laughable.
The points raised in the video are absurd grasping for straw acts and completely null and void to a subjective mind.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Originally posted by sajuek
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Stuff.
I don't care about anything that Gary Kleck said. I won't dispute that America has #ed itself so royally it can't possibly solve its gun addiction and that removing them would only put them in the hands of criminals. I will only stand on the fact that the UK is not a violent place. It is not more violent than South Africa. It is not more violent than any US City. And that banning guns was the best step towards making a society I'd want my kids to grow up in our government has ever taken.edit on 10-1-2013 by sajuek because: (no reason given)
I was going to respond to your points, even though they were horrible to begin with (remember you said you were going to "destroy the silly video"?). But that last paragraph was just complete bull.
You don't care what a criminologist has to say? Somebody that is an expert in this field. Somebody that USED to agree with you on gun control until he conducted studies and saw the facts? Right, you don't like the facts, you only care about the facts when they make your own nation look bad? and when they do make your country look bad you discredit them completely. Looking back at all of your postings, I'm actually not surprised you wouldn't care about the facts.
You clearly let emotion get in the way, enough to make you say something ridiculous like, "I will only stand on the fact that the UK is not a violent place. It is not more violent than any US City." Really? ANY U.S. CITY? wow... I see the EU factoid has clearly gone to your head. I'm not just saying it, you have proved it with your own words.
America has royally f'd itself by having a gun addiction? REALLY? Typical straw man. I never once personally attacked British culture in here but you felt you had to. Why? losing the argument?
CERTAIN Americans understand the second amendment. CERTAIN Americans know their history. CERTAIN Americans LIVE FREE or DIE.
BILL OF RIGHTS - AMENDMENT II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
edit on 10-1-2013 by eLPresidente because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Maxatoria
reply to post by Suspiria
Other than a guy a know burning a friends body after killing him to try and hide the body i've no knowledge of serious stupidity around here
But generally around here theres very little trouble that cant be sorted by a good presence
As for UK being the second most violent country in the Union, it's total nonsense. Please keep in mind that the Union includes countries which include Italy, Spain, Greece, Poland, Romania all of whom have very corrupt police forces and under-reporting of crimes is a serious issue as well as again, reporting methods being very different.
Quoting UN statistics, in 2011 the US had a murder rate of 4.8 people per 100,000 persons. The UK had a murder rate of 1.2 people per 100,000 persons, four times less. How Americans seem to think they have ground to stand on when arguing that the UK, let alone other anti-gun owning states in the EU are less safe is simply laughable.
The UK homicide rate has cut in half in 10 years. Does that reek of a violent culture to you?
Yeah, America has #ed itself and even gun advocates agree. "Well, banning firearms worked for the UK, but it wouldn't work here as only good folk would hand them over!" Which I agree with, there's nothing you can do about it, it's too late for your people to redeem themselves as gun control laws would simply mean armed criminals, and I bet you'd still have armed police too.
"CERTAIN Americans understand the second amendment. CERTAIN Americans know their history. CERTAIN Americans LIVE FREE or DIE."
Originally posted by woogleuk
reply to post by Logos23
Sadly I fear this is nothing more than a really bad, failed attempt at taking a pop at the British members of ATS who voice their opinion over gun control in the USA.
As you, I and other members have stated, the crime figures are possibly the worst things to look at to get an idea of actual physical violent crime.
Unfortunately these facts will fall upon deaf ears.
At the end of the day, I feel safe walking down the streets and sending my kid to school, so I couldn't really give a tarts furry cup.
Originally posted by Suspiria
reply to post by merkins
We do have rather a large amount of gun clubs for a nation that had their guns taken away...