It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Warpspeed
There are an awful lot of very important highly skilled and technical jobs more suited to women, but hand to hand combat on the front line on the ground is not one of them. This is insanity.
Originally posted by mpeake
Fine, I completely recant everything! I now wholeheartedly agree and desire that women not only be allowed to be in the front lines, but they be reqired to serve in the front lines. In fact, I say take rotating shifts...6 months of men then 6 months of women and so forth and so on. If the women want up there, then send them there. I really don't care anymore. I am sick of being considered sexist for thinking that the front lines are best served by men alone. In the back of my mind I still think that men are better physically equipped for that kind of warfare, but I won't ever say it again here. Roar Women Roar!!!
Originally posted by curme
To all of the people opposed to women in comabt, what should the Army do about the soldier shortage? Longer rotations? More IRR people called up? A draft?
Originally posted by cargo
Read my post again, I know there are women out there rough as guts and built like Ox's. But you speak as if they are the majority. By all means, send them to combat, it doesnt really bother me at all.
Originally posted by SHADOW266
Women have been in combat before. Who do you think bails out the infantry when they need to be pulled out of a fight? Military Police combat support units. Why? Because they got the heavy firepower for close fire support (50 cal and MK-19) to give the light infantry the time to pull back. Women regularly are assgined to these units.
I served in both integrated and male only units. The only difference in the fight is who can pull the trigger faster. 7 pounds of pull is all that's needed. Women fight just as good.
All I can say is that you wanted it...here's your shot.
Originally posted by Kriz_4
Originally posted by Warpspeed
There are an awful lot of very important highly skilled and technical jobs more suited to women, but hand to hand combat on the front line on the ground is not one of them. This is insanity.
Hand to hand combat is rare in modern warfare these days. I see no reason why a woman cannot handle modern frontline warfare.
Do any women here object to the army's proposal? That is an opinion I WOULD like to hear.
[edit on 27-10-2004 by Kriz_4]
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
So they wont be shattering your illusions of grandeur and manhood by scoring more kills than you anytime soon, they shall freeing you up from driving convoys so you can go show everyone how much better you are.
But it is amusing to watch the paranoid near nervous breakdowns of certain male posters when confronted by the fact that girls would be doing the same things.
Hysterical, really.
Originally posted by mpeake
Yeah! Let's put the women up there, not because they are able to do the job, but to show those pig headed men what they can do
Look, send the women up front because it's something that will help win the battle, not to prove some point.