Witness Protection a Scam?, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 8-1-2013 @ 06:42 PM by Sovaka
I watched a movie recently where they are putting someone into Witness Protection and I started to wonder about the effectiveness of it.

A couple things that sprang to mind when watching this movie was two parts of the process that stood out like a sore thumb.
Now before I talk about the 2 components, let me just state that I am aware that it is JUST a movie and that it doesn't go into depths of how REAL witness protection is handled.

HOWEVER;

#1 - Option to keep first name (Logic states it is easier to maintain your cover if you can naturally respond to your life long name)
This in itself doesn't mitigate what witness protection tries to accomplish, but it ties in with #2;
#2 - Issuance of a new drivers license.

This is where it falls down... In a world litigated by acts and statutes, we are strongly recommended to get a drivers license to drive.

Ok, so now this person in witness protection has been given a new drivers license with his original first name and different last name.
In conjunction with recognition systems available today, how is witness protection not rendered useless?
Let me rundown the process;

Assuming that the person that is trying to get the witness has some pull to actually get them.
Then lets assume they have access to the DMV licensing database (which includes photos).
With an image of their target and their first name, they would be able to find the location of the witness quite quickly
However, if the witness decided to change his/her first name as well, the bad guys could still find the witness relatively quickly with facial recognition system.

That's where I think it falls down... You go through all this effort to hide someone, yet they chuck their face straight back into the system?
How does that work?

I am sure they have Marshals with them, but if the Marshals aren't expecting an attack, then their chances of protecting the witness dramatically decreases.

So...
Is the modern day Witness Protection system just a con to make the witness "feel" safer?
edit on 8/1/2013 by Sovaka because: Syntax



reply posted on 8-1-2013 @ 07:02 PM by Sovaka
reply to post by JiggyPotamus



Well that is what I was thinking...
If they bribed someone with access to the system, it wouldn't be a hard process at all.
Limiting by first name, age range, sex and height.
Then run those that are left through facial recognition...

Would be a lot easier than trying to canvas the country.


reply posted on 8-1-2013 @ 07:04 PM by Sovaka
reply to post by bourbon2nite



Yes it was actually... And as I stated in my OP, I am aware it is just a movie.

Having said that, the two points in the process I mentioned, are still valid as that is part of a the legitimate process they would go through to place someone in witness protection.


reply posted on 8-1-2013 @ 10:12 PM by Sovaka
reply to post by MystikMushroom



Ahh ok, that makes sense....

But then wouldn't it not be wise to target someone far up enough on the chain where such uses can be covered?


reply posted on 8-1-2013 @ 10:49 PM by Pinke
Originally posted by Sovaka
reply to
post by MystikMushroom


But then wouldn't it not be wise to target someone far up enough on the chain where such uses can be covered?


I imagine very few DMV employees actually have a level of access to the system where they can edit transaction records. I'd also imagine records under witness protection are flagged and watched. Even if the transaction record was deleted, departments may be notified of the access when it occurs.

The other factor is that in the event of something happening this staff member would automatically be on the short list of people to speak to. If they had relationship to interested parties whatsoever it would make it worse. Oh and I imagine installing facial recognition software on a DMV terminal would involve IT department staff members, too. Which is yet another possible log.

I think Mushroom is mostly right. Might be possible but it would take considerable effort and risk.

Note: not to mention if the person is very important they will be prepped and protected to stop them being near facial recognition systems.
edit on 8-1-2013 by Pinke because: Note:

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags