I posted this in another thread ......
Before anybody comments regarding my post , here's a little light reading.
en.wikipedia.org...
Now , lets have a look at the argument of this thread .
[ A ] says that certain things are out of place with reality . [ A ] has no proof to back up their claim , just their memory of things being just a
little different to how they now appear.
[ B ] says that everything is as it should be and has documented proof to back up their claim and that [ A ] is either ill educated , or has a faulty
memory.
Now here's where it gets interesting.
What if the reality that [ A ] knew , collided with the reality of [ B ] ?
There could only be two logical results to this hypothesis . One is , both realities are destroyed from the collision and the other is that the
realities merge .
What if when two realities merge , they do so unequally , so either [ A ] merges into [ B ] , or [ B ] merges into [ A ] ? In effect , and this could
be completely random , either [ A ] or [ B ] becomes the dominant reality .
Let's just assume , for arguments sake that [ A ] merged into the more dominant [ B ] .
The people from [ A ] begin to notice very slight changes to reality but have absolutely no proof to back up their claims.
The people from [ B ] now begin to scoff at [ A ] because to them , nothing has changed and they have all the documented proof that nothing is
different and everything is as it should be .
[ A ] has no choice but to accept that maybe they were indeed mistaken about certain things , but that nagging feeling that all is not right, will not
go away.
Sound familiar ???
edit on 9-1-2013 by tpg47 because: (no reason given)
edit on 9-1-2013 by tpg47 because: (no reason
given)
edit on 9-1-2013 by tpg47 because: (no reason given)
edit on 9-1-2013 by tpg47 because: (no reason
given)