posted on Jan, 9 2013 @ 12:03 AM
I think a lot of you are missing some potential strategy behind what AJ did.
He listed off many items from TPTB's playbook in his rant. A lot of viewers have probably been completely unexposed to many issues he was
"discussing," and will now be compelled to due further research.
Alex was not on PM to single-handedly ensure the preservation of the 2nd amendment. To him, it is a foregone conclusion that there WILL be gun bans,
tyranny will be further implemented, and it is going to get worse before it gets better.
He may have purposefully conceded this interview to Piers in order to stir up commotion on the internet.
Alex has long-term goals of waking people up and spreading the word. His goal is to win the war, not the battle. Today his website received the most
hits ever, and he was the number 1 topic on Twitter. Had he calmly debated PM, people would not be discussing it today and visiting his website. So
while he probably turned a lot of people off, he very likely turned even more people on to the lies of TPTB, which is a win at the end of the day.
I know I first found Infowars and started to wake-up when the official media story about Fukushima didn't make sense to me. Google led me to Infowars
and other sites like this.
Additionally, for those who think he played right in PM's hand, I'm also not so sure about that. At the end of the interview when Piers says
"Whatever," you can see pure and total hatred and agitation in his eyes. He did not look like a man who just got what he wanted. Also, according to
Alex, they only gave him 2 segments versus a promised 3. If they were planning on him being a crazy lunatic, why not let him continue?
I also have to say that I would be shocked if AJ was a shill. For the casual listener and observer of his website, I could certainly see that
point-of-view, but if you listen to all three hours of his show each day for many years, you realize that there is no other possibility but for him to
be the real deal.