Originally posted by VforVendettea
reply to post by vkey08
I can comprehend the meaning of regulations and codes, I read them a lot in my line of work and can quote entire section of Title 22, 49 CFR and
after reading 12 USC Sec. 411 it is quite clear on the redemption of the notes.
Now I was going under the assumption that the majority of the readers were smart enough to understand the meaning of the original thread. And this
particular code gives them the right to dictate that the notes that they hold be redeemed in lawful money. We all know lawful money doesn't exist
anymore but US notes are treated as if they ‘were’ lawful money.
Simply not true, it's been proven time and time again by the courts that Federal Reserve Notes are Lawful Money and that there is nothing to 12 USC
411 that would entitle anyone to endorse or otherwise restrict the usage of it, plain and simple.. People have been arrested and have been visited by
the FBI for trying this scam, and well, it's better that you know all of it than only a part of it.
You tipped your hand on this thread long ago. You have a strong motivation defend the federal reserve and keep people from applying the option in 12
USC Sec. 411 – too strong to just be a casual interest.
Everything after has just been you throwing a tantrum because I am not hanging on your every word.
Actually nothing I wrote "defends the Federal Reserve" What i have written and will continue to write about wherever I happen across it, is the
fact that an entire scam industry has grown out of the thought that with a few misquotes and misdirections, you too can free yourself of the burden of
taxes, of debt etc, and this is just one more of those scams, you heard it SCAM. The person responsible for pushing this theory of 12USC411 has been
in and out of trouble over it, banned from many places across the net because of his refusal to prove that it is a) legal and b) works.
As for throwing a tantrum, please show me where I did. It seems to me that you are the one throwing insults, accusations and implications because
someone has a brain and decided to research all of this nonsense, i've given quote after quote, and link after link to prove that this is nothing
more than a scam, to show where it ties into the A4V and Freeman scams, and you continue to ignore it all.
You also keep missing the fact that i have applauded the fact that you want to take a stand against such a rotten agency as the Fed, I have supported
(and it's the only thing of his i've supported) Ron Paul's call to audit them, I have written many a letter to Congress begging them to pass a full
audit, and have researched much about the Sovereignty movement, from the rather out there notion that we are under something called Admiralty Law
(simply not true) to the claims that you can keep banks form lending out your money to others by a simple endorsement. All of it is false, and
misleading, and in the end, gets people into trouble.
Maybe if you show where this works (and not a thread by Mr Van Pelt or however he writes out his name these days) where a normal person was able to
stop a bank from lending out their money, and where a person was given any remedy by somehow redeeming in "lawful money" I am all ears.. From the
research I've done though, it is just another scam to try and beat the evil dragon..
As for code, I too ham extremely familiar with USC and the CFR as daily I have to put them to use , so that's nothing that you can use to try and be
high and mighty..
1)so far you have shown, that you are advocating breaking the law, based upon something you read on the internet, based upon the ramblings of a known
scam artist (as I have pointed out I can find the entirety of the first part of your Op word for word elsewhere online., as well as the notations by
Mr Merrill-Van Pelt that you somehow have to use $ with 2 lines because one line is whatever.. )
2) You are refusing to acknowledge that there are many differing opinions, and have resorted to personal attacks.
3) You cannot source anything other than 12USC411 did mean something at one time, it does not any longer, as you have conveniently not added all the
amendments that have come since that nullify your theory..
Please explain how that is me "tantruming"