Assad historical speech (06/01/2013) The TRUTH speaks

An attack on Syria is an attack on Iran. Attack Iran is attacking Russia.

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by DarknStormy

 

Gadaffhi was going to spill the beans on how sarkozy won the elections and the next thing we knew he was attacked by france and the uk joined them. If you talk about some nato leader in bad ways then you get bombs dropped on you OR they allow their patsies alqueda to do the dirty work for them.

I suggest people go find the Libyan constitution before they decide whether Gaddafi was a dictator or not. Yes, he may of done some horrible things but the people of Libya were far from oppressed. Gaddafi was in the process of introducing a new currency. The elite couldn't have that along with a unified Africa. All I see is different arms of the same face taking turns regarding different nations.

Libya we had France and co - Syria seems to be Turkeys turn - Afghan and Iraq - Coalition forces - Iran may be the one where everyone gets a piece of the action.

reply to post by DarknStormy


There has never been a revolution in the modern world, to my knowledge, that was isolated to local issues and not influenced by global super powers.

Hell, what do you think France was doing during America's revolution? The American revolution was bought and paid for by the French people. And then, the French revolution had its foreign supporters as well.

Ever read up on the communist revolution? Bought and paid for by Germany.

There really just does not exist revolutions that are not influenced by another nation or force. That's simply the way it works.

Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by Gorman91

 

Look, I can jabber on about Libya and show you why that was one big load of crap also, but that is not the topic. As for Egypt, well I wouldn't call sweeping powers for the better of Egyptians. But there is one thing similar about both of those countries - ISLAM. The big bad boogeyman is becoming a revolutionary politic movement...

In Syria you have two primary sects of Muslims in battle, the Alawite minority power (Assad) and the Sunni Muslims.

If Islam is the "big bad boogeyman" as you say, which is the greater evil Alawite Muslims, or Sunni Muslims? You also have Shiites which are aligned with the Alawites.

Of the two which is the lesser evil?

The truth is, while this conflict seems new, it is centuries old, maybe a lot has changed, but much is the same.

There are clandestine groups also involved here, elusive Islamic radicals who have a much greater plan for war and victory over the "great Satan" ... A plan to unite all sects, to destroy Israel, and ultimately establish a global Islamic caliphate.

The USA, and NATO are being purposefully drawn into all of this to achieve many of those objectives, but sadly they are only going to learn this the hard way. If they choose to take the bait when the time comes.

In my opinion, of course.

Difficult choices are directly ahead, for all of humanity....

reply to post by RizeorDie


Eh.. I know that the "rebels" are not not a legitimate uprising and we have no business choosing sides, but don't let that fact blind you to the reality that Assad is a terrible "leader" and has given a minority in his country (the alawites I believe) everything at the expense of the other Muslims there. I wouldn't say the people like him, they are just afraid of him, and probably happier being poor and oppressed as opposed to dead by rebel false flags.

reply to post by Gorman91


That may be the case but its absolute BS.. All because of what one country can benefit from it with the price of blood.

reply to post by DarknStormy


So now do you see what is true? There are none without blood on their hands. Assad is no more and no less guilty than America.

Just as the British hired Germans to fight for them, and the Americans got French support, so too do the groups in Syria request the aid of Russia, America, and Europe.

It is all war. Always. None are innocent, and all do the same. Slaughter each other.

All have debts to each other, and all lie to avoid payment.

Therefore, why pick a side based off innocents? Choose instead, to pick the side that builds sky scrappers instead of bombs. You really don't have much of a choice beyond that.

reply to post by ausername


Israel are the key in all of this. When Islam takes over, then Israel can demonise them just the same as they are demonising Iran right now. It gives them a justified stance to the west to pretty much wage war at will. I don't know if anyone else agrees but this is just the beginning.

Originally posted by RizeorDie
Full Dr. Bashar Al Assad...

Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by ausername

 

I don't know if anyone else agrees but this is just the beginning.

The beginning of the end.

Originally posted by rabzdguy
An attack on Syria is an attack on Iran. Attack Iran is attacking Russia.

Yeah it never made sense to me. If syria was liberal then why are they siding with iran? Iran is a non-secular country. I guess they just all love to hate israel, destroy it and make it palestine. Israel unites muslim fanatics and moderates. Saddam was called a socialist by OBL!

reply to post by Gorman91


I don't see the point of basing my choice off people building bigger infractructure etc. When it comes down to it, our way of life aint perfect and we will soon find that out when we cannot get our hands on the things we need the most. With that, terrorists are not building skyscrapers, they knock them down.

Originally posted by ausername

Originally posted by DarknStormy
reply to post by ausername

 

I don't know if anyone else agrees but this is just the beginning.

The beginning of the end.

It sort of makes me glad I'm in Oz, but I don't think we will even escape if the worst case scenario was to occur.

reply to post by DarknStormy


The moral of the story is that no one is innocent, so fix what is already working in part, and leave to burn what is burning.

Originally posted by DarknStormy

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by DarknStormy

 

Gadaffhi was going to spill the beans on how sarkozy won the elections and the next thing we knew he was attacked by france and the uk joined them. If you talk about some nato leader in bad ways then you get bombs dropped on you OR they allow their patsies alqueda to do the dirty work for them.

I suggest people go find the Libyan constitution before they decide whether Gaddafi was a dictator or not. Yes, he may of done some horrible things but the people of Libya were far from oppressed. Gaddafi was in the process of introducing a new currency. The elite couldn't have that along with a unified Africa. All I see is different arms of the same face taking turns regarding different nations.

Libya we had France and co - Syria seems to be Turkeys turn - Afghan and Iraq - Coalition forces - Iran may be the one where everyone gets a piece of the action.

Yeah the bankers are behind everything. Its a ruse to have perpetual conflict, control the resources, create new jobs, etc. The top bankers are illuminati aka high level masons. The same bankers waging war on america, greece, italy, spain, portugal, argentina, etc.

Bankers always win, that is the constant and everything else is a variable.

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by DarknStormy

 

The moral of the story is that no one is innocent, so fix what is already working in part, and leave to burn what is burning.

Or leave sovereign nations to sort their internal problems out themselves... I'd love to see the same happening in America and people just standing by and letting it happen.

reply to post by DarknStormy


Sovereign nations don't exist. They never really did.

reply to post by RizeorDie


This world is becoming to aggressive and needs to stop.

Originally posted by DarknStormy
Or leave sovereign nations to sort their internal problems out themselves...

In this particular case, the best thing would be for the USA/NATO and Russia to pull out completely, and let whichever Allah these factions pray to sort it all out in the final body count.

But you know, that isn't going to happen. They're not going to be able to stop what will come next either...

Good luck.

Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by DarknStormy

 

The moral of the story is that no one is innocent, so fix what is already working in part, and leave to burn what is burning.

edit on 6-1-2013 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)

Of course no one is innocent but look who has 30 aircraft carriers, stealth bombers and fighters AND TEN TIMES BIGGER MILITARY then the second biggest nation. It is called usa....the police state that gives no mention to libertarians, constitutionalists or greens.

The ussr collapsed 20+ years ago and ever since america has been making progress into former warsaw pact nations, selling them weapons and other sweet deals...trying to isolate russia while simultanously ripping off chinnese labor.

America has overthrown more governments throughout the world then all the other nations combined have. it is much easier to support russia and china for their better track record....and of course their proxies by default. Not saying i love russia or china either. They are simply the underdog and people normally route for underdogs.