Assad historical speech (06/01/2013) The TRUTH speaks

Originally posted by dorkfish87
Whether or not someone's a terrorist just depends on who's holding the gun. I'm sure Assad thinks that they're terrorists, they oppose his totalitarian regime.

Personally, I agree, but he's a terrorist too

People should really look up what the US constitution says the government can do to people rebelling. I don't get how any American can criticize a government stopping rebellions with force.

reply to post by Ghost375


Most people here need to look up the Kent State shooting by the National Guard.
These people werent even rioting, they were just protesting the Viet Nam war.

Originally posted by ausername
Assad may not be as bad as some have portrayed him to be, but he isn't a saint either.

I'm not sure which is more disgusting here in this context, the unanswered crimes against humanity, or the overt ass kissing Assad is enjoying from so many of you here now.

Assad was placed into this position through external forces.. his defence is legitimate, and the killing of any "civilians" falls under the Geneva convention of warfare..

PS, those 'civilians' are foreign jihadi mercs bought and paid for with our tax dollars!

The real crime against humanity is the continuous propaganda against the West while taking the money right out of their wallets to fund it.

Beautiful, if you are part of that system..

reply to post by ausername

Assad may not be as bad as some have portrayed him to be, but he isn't a saint either.

Who is?

I'm not sure which is more disgusting here in this context, the unanswered crimes against humanity...

You mean by the Americans and Nato, right?

...or the overt ass kissing Assad is enjoying from so many of you here now.

Thats right, turn a discussion on lawful governments into a "ass kissing contest". Who are you puckering up to?

Originally posted by Juggernog
reply to post by Ghost375

 

Most people here need to look up the Kent State shooting by the National Guard.
These people werent even rioting, they were just protesting the Viet Nam war.

It happens everywhere.. Its still happening in Bahrain and the injured cannot even get assistance in the hospitals our of fear of being arrested.

Bahrain protests

And remembering what happened last year, it wouldn't surprise me if a few of them haven't bitten the dust either..

reply to post by Ghost375

I don't get how any American can criticize a government stopping rebellions with force.

Most Americans don't. Its their media that is doing that. According to them the American Government is the "Humanitarian Interveners" and the Syrian Government is the "Evil Regime".

It's easier that way.

Originally posted by intrptr
Most Americans don't. Its their media that is doing that. According to them the American Government is the "Humanitarian Interveners" and the Syrian Government is the "Evil Regime".

This argument is often the bolt hole of the blinkered. Ask yourself this simple question.

“If Syria is such a smashing place to be (and Iran, China, Libya etc) then why do so many people drop all they have an emigrate to the US or Europe”?

Sorry, but it's because the media, human rights organisations and refugees are often telling the truth that the countries they flee are "evil" and repressive.

Just thought I'd state this point for balance.

Regards

Originally posted by yorkshirelad
So please tell me when were you in Syria? Who did you meet ?

If you have not been there then you are simply deciding whose story to believe.

DUH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If you had have checked, the original poster's address is Damascus. That could be a hint.

Originally posted by Juggernog
Someone, NATO, UN, EU or some other power is systematically taking down the Arab states that were prosperous and had liberal islamic views.
First it was Egypt, yea not very prosperous but they were tolerant to a lot of non muslim.
Then you have Libya, which was by far the most prosperous country in Northern Africa, maybe even the entire continent and they were also very liberal.
Next up is Syria and its civil war whose rebels are largely made up of non Syrians, just as it was in Libya and Egypt.
Come on, does it have to hit you right in the face before you can see whats going on?

edit on 1/6/2013 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)

All prosperous nations that do not play by the rules of the international banking cartels are subject to sanctions and coup attempts until they comply or their regime is overthrown.

From the Economy of Syria:

Foreign debt

Syria has made progress in easing its heavy foreign debt burden through bilateral rescheduling deals with virtually all of its key creditors in Europe.In December 2004, Syria and Poland reached an agreement by which Syria would pay $27 million out of the total $261.7 million debt. In January 2005, Russia and Syria signed a deal that wrote off nearly 80% of Syria's debt to Russia, approximately €10.5 billion ($13 billion). The agreement left Syria with less than €3 billion (just over $3.6 billion) owed to Moscow. Half of it would be repaid over the next 10 years, while the rest would be paid into Russian accounts in Syrian banks and could be used for Russian investment projects in Syria and for buying Syrian products. This agreement was part of a weapons deal between Russia and Syria. And later that year Syria reached an agreement with Slovakia, and the Czech Republic to settle debt estimated at $1.6 billion. Again Syria was forgiven the bulk of its debt, in exchange for a one time payment of $150 million. Syria has also settled its debt with Iran and the World Bank.

Syria struck deals and reduced their debt. Their economy was not controlled by the same banking cartels that control the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve.

One by one, all nations will be forced to comply with the model of enslavement to debt. The goal is not to destroy the nation and its people, the goal is to control the resources and people. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt... it will continue until all nations comply with the plan.

They (the powers) are patient. It took the powers that control the Federal Reserve years to detach the currency from value (gold), monetize debt, and fully manipulate Wall Street. They will eventually get to Iran and North Korea. The list of nations in non-compliance is growing thin. It is a slow process, and may require decades more before there is a world currency, followed by a world government. We all know what comes next.

Cheers!

reply to post by InTheFlesh1980

All prosperous nations that do not play by the rules of the international banking cartels are subject to sanctions and coup attempts until they comply or their regime is overthrown.

I think youre exactly right. Wasnt the first thing that Libyas "liberators" did was to set up a central bank?

Iceland had the right idea, they arrested ALL of the corrupt banksters and their economy is making a huge come back.

Originally posted by Juggernog
reply to post by InTheFlesh1980

 

All prosperous nations that do not play by the rules of the international banking cartels are subject to sanctions and coup attempts until they comply or their regime is overthrown.

I think youre exactly right. Wasnt the first thing that Libyas "liberators" did was to set up a central bank?

I think the Libya invasion had nothing to do with gaddafi being a dictator, he was simply far from a dictator. It was more to do with him going solo and trying to unify Africa with its own currency. Obviously that would be a thorn in the banksters sides.

Originally posted by paraphi

Originally posted by intrptr
Most Americans don't. Its their media that is doing that. According to them the American Government is the "Humanitarian Interveners" and the Syrian Government is the "Evil Regime".

“If Syria is such a smashing place to be (and Iran, China, Libya etc) then why do so many people drop all they have an emigrate to the US or Europe”?

NATO's clandestine guerrilla war in Syria from Turkey (also NATO) is why Syria is not "smashing" anymore. Not because the Syrian Government is "evil".

40 years of control is too long Syria deserve change!!!

Originally posted by cass1dy09
40 years of control is too long Syria deserve change!!!

Says who? Europe? The USA? The world? What about the opinions of the very people living in the country? Can't they decide whats best for their own country? They seem to like Assad btw..

reply to post by RizeorDie

Al Assad is an educated man, he is a popular leader, he is loved by the Syrian nation regardless what Clinton says.

He is also a momma's boy that has tried desperately to get the approval of the matriarch who flat out tells him he doesn't measure up to his late brother and late Father. The Father being the one who originally set up the bridges that Al Assad burned when he came into power.

If you wanted to take over a country you have 2 real options:

1) Military Force
2) Overthrow the Govt and replace it with one that does what you tell it

So take a look at a map of the world and note where Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, & Egypt are, and that Iran is stuck in the middle, and Israel is in there too.

Why would anyone want to control that whole region?

Amazing that every country there is either ruled by an evil dictator or is a "terrorist" nation.

Or are they?

Originally posted by Power_Semi
Amazing that every country there is either ruled by an evil dictator or is a "terrorist" nation.

Or are they?

Except Israel of course who cannot be criticised or held accountable for any action they have ever committed. No doubt they are the biggest terrorists in the region.

I mean, he is a good speaker, and the things he is saying are great, but all he is doing will be ultimately giving the people over to the "Federal Reserve."

reply to post by DarknStormy


N Korean ppl like Kim-Jong too. Assad isn't corrupt so ppl might like him but ppl were freaking out that Obama could get 3 terms never-mind 4 decades!

Originally posted by Juggernog
reply to post by InTheFlesh1980

 

All prosperous nations that do not play by the rules of the international banking cartels are subject to sanctions and coup attempts until they comply or their regime is overthrown.

I think you're exactly right. Wasn't the first thing that Libya's "liberators" did was to set up a central bank?

In fact before the shooting even stopped...

Some researchers are pointing out that Iran is one of only three countries left in the world whose central bank is not under Rothschild control. Before 9-11 there were reportedly seven: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran. By 2003, however, Afghanistan and Iraq were swallowed up by the Rothschild octopus, and by 2011 Sudan and Libya were also gone. In Libya, a Rothschild bank was established in Benghazi while the country was still at war.

americanfreepress.net...