Assad historical speech (06/01/2013) The TRUTH speaks, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 166 times


reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 05:35 PM by Juggernog
reply to post by Ghost375



Most people here need to look up the Kent State shooting by the National Guard.
These people werent even rioting, they were just protesting the Viet Nam war.


reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 05:42 PM by intrptr
reply to post by ausername


Assad may not be as bad as some have portrayed him to be, but he isn't a saint either.

Who is?

I'm not sure which is more disgusting here in this context, the unanswered crimes against humanity...

You mean by the Americans and Nato, right?

...or the overt ass kissing Assad is enjoying from so many of you here now.

Thats right, turn a discussion on lawful governments into a "ass kissing contest". Who are you puckering up to?


reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 05:47 PM by DarknStormy
Originally posted by Juggernog
reply to
post by Ghost375



Most people here need to look up the Kent State shooting by the National Guard.
These people werent even rioting, they were just protesting the Viet Nam war.


It happens everywhere.. Its still happening in Bahrain and the injured cannot even get assistance in the hospitals our of fear of being arrested.

Bahrain protests

And remembering what happened last year, it wouldn't surprise me if a few of them haven't bitten the dust either..
edit on 6-1-2013 by DarknStormy because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 05:57 PM by intrptr
reply to post by Ghost375


I don't get how any American can criticize a government stopping rebellions with force.


Most Americans don't. Its their media that is doing that. According to them the American Government is the "Humanitarian Interveners" and the Syrian Government is the "Evil Regime".

It's easier that way.


reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 06:43 PM by InTheFlesh1980
Originally posted by Juggernog
Someone, NATO, UN, EU or some other power is systematically taking down the Arab states that were prosperous and had liberal islamic views.
First it was Egypt, yea not very prosperous but they were tolerant to a lot of non muslim.
Then you have Libya, which was by far the most prosperous country in Northern Africa, maybe even the entire continent and they were also very liberal.
Next up is Syria and its civil war whose rebels are largely made up of non Syrians, just as it was in Libya and Egypt.
Come on, does it have to hit you right in the face before you can see whats going on?
edit on 1/6/2013 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)


All prosperous nations that do not play by the rules of the international banking cartels are subject to sanctions and coup attempts until they comply or their regime is overthrown.

From
the Economy of Syria:

Foreign debt

Syria has made progress in easing its heavy foreign debt burden through bilateral rescheduling deals with virtually all of its key creditors in Europe.In December 2004, Syria and Poland reached an agreement by which Syria would pay $27 million out of the total $261.7 million debt. In January 2005, Russia and Syria signed a deal that wrote off nearly 80% of Syria's debt to Russia, approximately €10.5 billion ($13 billion). The agreement left Syria with less than €3 billion (just over $3.6 billion) owed to Moscow. Half of it would be repaid over the next 10 years, while the rest would be paid into Russian accounts in Syrian banks and could be used for Russian investment projects in Syria and for buying Syrian products. This agreement was part of a weapons deal between Russia and Syria. And later that year Syria reached an agreement with Slovakia, and the Czech Republic to settle debt estimated at $1.6 billion. Again Syria was forgiven the bulk of its debt, in exchange for a one time payment of $150 million. Syria has also settled its debt with Iran and the World Bank.


Syria struck deals and reduced their debt. Their economy was not controlled by the same banking cartels that control the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve.

One by one, all nations will be forced to comply with the model of enslavement to debt. The goal is not to destroy the nation and its people, the goal is to control the resources and people. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt... it will continue until all nations comply with the plan.

They (the powers) are patient. It took the powers that control the Federal Reserve years to detach the currency from value (gold), monetize debt, and fully manipulate Wall Street. They will eventually get to Iran and North Korea. The list of nations in non-compliance is growing thin. It is a slow process, and may require decades more before there is a world currency, followed by a world government. We all know what comes next.

Cheers!


reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 06:51 PM by Juggernog
reply to post by InTheFlesh1980





All prosperous nations that do not play by the rules of the international banking cartels are subject to sanctions and coup attempts until they comply or their regime is overthrown.


I think youre exactly right. Wasnt the first thing that Libyas "liberators" did was to set up a central bank?

Iceland had the right idea, they arrested ALL of the corrupt banksters and their economy is making a huge come back.
edit on 1/6/2013 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 06:58 PM by DarknStormy
Originally posted by Juggernog
reply to
post by InTheFlesh1980





All prosperous nations that do not play by the rules of the international banking cartels are subject to sanctions and coup attempts until they comply or their regime is overthrown.


I think youre exactly right. Wasnt the first thing that Libyas "liberators" did was to set up a central bank?


I think the Libya invasion had nothing to do with gaddafi being a dictator, he was simply far from a dictator. It was more to do with him going solo and trying to unify Africa with its own currency. Obviously that would be a thorn in the banksters sides.


reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 07:07 PM by boncho
reply to post by RizeorDie

Al Assad is an educated man, he is a popular leader, he is loved by the Syrian nation regardless what Clinton says.




He is also a momma's boy that has tried desperately to get the approval of the matriarch who flat out tells him he doesn't measure up to his late brother and late Father. The Father being the one who originally set up the bridges that Al Assad burned when he came into power.


reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 07:16 PM by cass1dy09
reply to post by DarknStormy



N Korean ppl like Kim-Jong too. Assad isn't corrupt so ppl might like him but ppl were freaking out that Obama could get 3 terms never-mind 4 decades!
edit on 6-1-2013 by cass1dy09 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-1-2013 @ 07:19 PM by intrptr
Originally posted by Juggernog
reply to
post by InTheFlesh1980


All prosperous nations that do not play by the rules of the international banking cartels are subject to sanctions and coup attempts until they comply or their regime is overthrown.


I think you're exactly right. Wasn't the first thing that Libya's "liberators" did was to set up a central bank?

In fact before the shooting even stopped...

Some researchers are pointing out that Iran is one of only three countries left in the world whose central bank is not under Rothschild control. Before 9-11 there were reportedly seven: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran. By 2003, however, Afghanistan and Iraq were swallowed up by the Rothschild octopus, and by 2011 Sudan and Libya were also gone. In Libya, a Rothschild bank was established in Benghazi while the country was still at war.

americanfreepress.net...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel Uses a 13 Year Old Boy as a Human Shield
  Posted 15 days ago with 38 member flags
The Most Outrageous Hateful Rhetoric of All Time
  Posted 16 days ago with 37 member flags
US Preparing for a Post-Israel Middle East?
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags
Iran Bashing, Terrorism and Who Chose The Chosen People, Anyway?
  Posted 16 days ago with 21 member flags