It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chrisb9
Originally posted by poet1b
There is one big business that runs everything, the bankers.
The bankers control the oil industry, the insurance industry, the military industrial complex, big ag, big pharma, the media, everything.
The plan to destroy the US government, shrink it down until it can be drowned in the bath water, has only resulted in a bank take over of the US government, which has not shrunk at all, but in fact gotten far bigger than ever.
People don't care about the facts, far too many are brainwashed by right wing talk radio.
edit on 6-1-2013 by poet1b because: Add missing not
---------------
A very interesting and timely thread S & F ToTheTenth !
I also agree with poet1b's statement above. It's the big banks, they own and run everything. I saved this lengthy article below that goes into great detail on this subject. I would also add " A Time for everything under the sun " as observed and written by King Solomon in the book of Ecclesiastes.
Banking Cartel is the Cause of Humanity's Woes
June 26, 2002
"The Secrets of the Federal Reserve" by Eustace Mullins
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies." ---Thomas Jefferson
In November 1949, Eustace Mullins, 25, was a researcher in Washington DC when friends invited him to visit the famous American poet Ezra Pound, who was confined at St. Elizabeth's Mental Hospital and listed as a "political prisoner."
A leading figure in Modern English literature, Pound was the editor and critic who introduced the world to James Joyce, W.B. Yeats and T.S. Eliot. During the Second World War, he was charged with treason for broadcasts on Rome Radio that questioned the motives behind America's involvement.
Pound commissioned Mullins to examine the influence of the banking establishment on U.S. policy. Mullins spent every morning for two years in the Library of Congress and met with Pound every afternoon. The resulting manuscript, "The Secrets of the Federal Reserve" proved too hot for any American publisher to handle. Nineteen rejected it. One said, "you'll never get this published in New York." When it finally appeared in Germany in 1955, the U.S. Military Government confiscated all 10,000 copies and burned them.
Thanks to the American Patriot Friends Network, this book is freely available on line. (I recommend you save it on your desktop, as I did.) Why is it so (excuse the pun) inflammatory?
Essentially it paints a picture of the world, and the role of the United States, which is radically different from the one we are given in school or in the media.
"Notwithstanding the war of independence against England," writes Mullins, "we remained an economic and financial colony of Great Britain." Between 1865 and 1913, he says London bankers led by the Rothschilds used agents such as J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller to gain control of American industry and organize it into cartels.
Where did these bankers get the money? For over 200 years, European bankers have been able to draw on the credit of their host countries to print it!
In the Seventeenth Century, the moneylenders and the aristocracy made a pact. If the king would make paper currency a liability of the state, the moneylenders would print as much as he liked! Thus the Banks of England, France and the Reichsbank came into being but they were all private corporations and remain so today.
According to this nefarious pact, the moneylenders got to charge interest on assets they created out of thin air. The aristocracy all took shares in the central banks plus they got to finance a burgeoning government and to wage costly wars.
This piece of chicanery is at the heart what plagues humanity.
The bankers have a vested interest in the state (i.e. the people) incurring as much debt as possible. They are behind the Marxist, socialist and liberal movements which call for big government and social spending. They are behind the catastrophic wars of the last century. The Warburgs financed the Bolshevik Revolution. The Bank of England financed the rise of Hitler. Prescott Bush (W's grandfather) was head of Brown Brothers Harriman, which financed the construction of the Nazi war machine.
Naturally if you can create money out of thin air, your first instinct is to buy tangible assets with it. There is a powerful impulse to use debt to control nations and take over their real assets. This is the essence of the so-called Third World Debt crisis. Dedicated to owning all wealth and enslaving humanity, an irresistible vampire has been unleashed upon the world
Continued in next post:
The Defense Department immediately rejected two military spending plans put forth in the Republican-controlled House that recommend boosting the Pentagon's 2013 budget as much as $4 billion above its spending request.
Members of the House Armed Services Committee earlier in the day rejected Pentagon proposals to retire aircraft and ships and added funding for projects such as building a missile interceptor site on the East Coast.
Specifically, the committee's version of the 2013 defense authorization bill overturned an Air Force proposal to retire all of its Alenia C-27J cargo planes and Northrop Grumman Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned reconnaissance aircraft. The panel added $138 million to restart C-27J contracts that the Air Force has not renewed.
The committee restored three of the four cruisers that the Navy wants to retire early in 2013, prevented the Army from retiring its C-23 Sherpa cargo planes, and funded A-10 attack jets and F-16 fighters that the Air Force wants to retire.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Huge star and flag - one of the biggest were sinking in debt and deficits.
Want to see how powerful the Military Industrial Complex is? Even when the Pentagon - the PENTAGON - wanted to trim it's own budget, senators REJECTED their smaller budget and instead INSISTED they SPEND MORE.
Pentagon to House Republicans: We don't want more money
The Defense Department immediately rejected two military spending plans put forth in the Republican-controlled House that recommend boosting the Pentagon's 2013 budget as much as $4 billion above its spending request.
Members of the House Armed Services Committee earlier in the day rejected Pentagon proposals to retire aircraft and ships and added funding for projects such as building a missile interceptor site on the East Coast.
Specifically, the committee's version of the 2013 defense authorization bill overturned an Air Force proposal to retire all of its Alenia C-27J cargo planes and Northrop Grumman Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned reconnaissance aircraft. The panel added $138 million to restart C-27J contracts that the Air Force has not renewed.
The committee restored three of the four cruisers that the Navy wants to retire early in 2013, prevented the Army from retiring its C-23 Sherpa cargo planes, and funded A-10 attack jets and F-16 fighters that the Air Force wants to retire.
The Army, Air Force and Navy want to retire these programs for a reason. But apparently these senators know better than the military what the military needs - or should we say, Boeing, Grumman, McDonnell Douglas, et al, are getting their money's worth out of these lapdogs.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
Recognised the name. He appears in this documentary, which is related to the subject matter of the op.
Park Avenue - Money, Power and the American Dream
Through archive and interviews with academics, political scientists, psychologists, former lobbyists and even a former doorman at 740 Park, Gibney's film is a polemical look at the socio-economic political landscape of contemporary USA.
originally posted by: Murgatroid
I see books such as the one Sachs wrote as simply nothing more than propaganda designed to confuse people and hide the agenda behind the REAL people who are in control.
Some major red flags I see here:
1) The authors name is "Sachs" who some refer to as a globalist shill.
2) He appears to be a mainstream "academics" professor.
3) The source is from the MSM (Sydney Morning Herald)
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
For the record, not everyone is a shill, although some may be brainwashed themselves. I am in Sach's four year old international development grad program at Columbia. And I literally have a final for his development economics class tomorrow (ugh). So, long story short, I've been sitting ten feet from the guy and talking to him all semester. Based on his speech on an everyday basis, and the intuition I get from him, I truly believe that he sincerely cares about the world, people, social justice, etc. That doesn't make everything he says right.
when all systems are completely owned outside the public sphere, and culture has lost its meaning, philosophy, ethic and purpose [yes, darwinists, people DO organize and form societies for mutual support rather than gather to be dominated], when ecologies are failing and species are being mutated for corporate profit, when crowds scream for plastic products and act out video games in the real world with no care for their fellow man, when only a few psychopaths control, own, classify and decide everything from positions outside the realm of wholer community to such an extent there are no options for alternatives or salvation....cultural systems historically fail. ecolgies fail. economies fall. civilizations collapse.
with our people divided in mutual, cultureless, left and right hate and despising, and the looting globalist robber barons in complete control of every system, with culture so disinterated from within that nothings make meaningful sense but selfishness, control and hateful narcissism, i fear the republic is lost.
(during the 1960s-70s) The People who dared to question the status quo were labeled Hippies/Freaks/Commies & Disillusional Drug Addicted Flower Children.
Hence the 'War on Drugs'.
As is usual TPTB took the focus off of the problem & blamed the whacky 'Societal Fringe' for the Nation's woes.
Sadly most People will not wake up until they fall out of bed and hit the floor.
By then the damage will be complete.
originally posted by: Murgatroid
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
For the record, not everyone is a shill, although some may be brainwashed themselves. I am in Sach's four year old international development grad program at Columbia. And I literally have a final for his development economics class tomorrow (ugh). So, long story short, I've been sitting ten feet from the guy and talking to him all semester. Based on his speech on an everyday basis, and the intuition I get from him, I truly believe that he sincerely cares about the world, people, social justice, etc. That doesn't make everything he says right.
Good info...
First hand sources always rank high as far credibility goes.
Your comment about those who are brainwashed is a very key point and I agree 100%.
So many times I suspect that those we label as shills is no different from us with the exception that they are just deceived.
Thanks for the wonderful insight...