Originally posted by Vidpci
Originally posted by SM2
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by tothetenthpower
the paper didn't even out gun owners, just permit holders.
what Coulter suggests isn't even comparable.
Actually, they did out gun owners. In the Peoples Republic of New York, you have to get a permit to purchase a firearm. a permit that will allow you
have one and if you want to carry, you have to have yet another permit. If you live in NYC, well, then there are even more hoops to jump through
All of which are unconstitutional.
I'm not sure what these people don't understand about the term "shall not be infringed upon".
edit on 5-1-2013 by Vidpci because: (no
I wager they understand the statement entirely, but it doesnt matter, because their irrational fear of an inanimate object is overriding logic.
I keep a .45acp with one of those evil "high capacity clips" which is actually a magazine that was provided by the manufacturer, loaded, one in the
chamber, safety on, sitting right beside me for months. It has never went off, never gotten up and acted of it's own free will.
So in order for the more sensitive among us to feel safe, my rights have to be trampled? Screw that, they need to get over it.
How about, anyone that wants to exercise free speech will have to get a permit to do so. Free speech is potentially dangerous.You may not exercise
free speech without a permit granted by the state, in order to obtain said permit you have to subject yourself to a background check (personal
references needed in some states) finger printing and training from a licensed training facility. It will also cost you hundreds of dollars. If you
are exercising that right without said permit ( permission from the government) then you go to jail.