It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
oh yeah, and
it is clear you do not understand the distinction between private confidential medical information and public records which are available for ANYONE to view. I literally cannot believe you are making these arguments. It is mind blowing to me.
2 + fineSean Timmons said Dr. Ervin Batchelor, chief doctor at Carolina Center for Development and Rehabilitation, had counted approximately 900 records, some 100 pages thick.
four
three
These are some of the most sensitive, intimate personal medical records a person can have.
i sure hope you're not an American
What I was going to say was the absence of government is the only thing that will restrict government authority.
Originally posted by SM2
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by tothetenthpower
the paper didn't even out gun owners, just permit holders.
what Coulter suggests isn't even comparable.
.
Actually, they did out gun owners. In the Peoples Republic of New York, you have to get a permit to purchase a firearm. a permit that will allow you have one and if you want to carry, you have to have yet another permit. If you live in NYC, well, then there are even more hoops to jump through
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by stupid girl
I'm 100% pro-gun rights, but a retaliatory argument based on publishing medical information is idiotic.edit on 4-1-2013 by stupid girl because: (no reason given)
and that is the point.
I don't think anyone really wants to dive into medical records on someone. But why are medical records any more secretive than records of what I own?
In San Antonio this last summer there was a group of folks who would look for people with NRA stickers on their vehicles. They would follow them home, mark where they lived, and then return when the house was empty to steal the guns. They are worth quite a bit on the resell market (read: black market). I don't put NRA stickers on my car because of this.
Publishing a list that includes what I have purchased, to me, makes me a target for crime.
Originally posted by stupid girl
I'm 100% pro-gun rights, but a retaliatory argument based on publishing medical information is idiotic.edit on 4-1-2013 by stupid girl because: (no reason given)
World's most premature baby, born at 21 weeks and five days
About.com
Approximately 88% of abortions are preformed within in the first trimester (3 months) of a pregnancy. Roughly 59% take place within the first eight weeks of pregnancy, 19% in weeks 9 to 10, and 10% in weeks 11 to 12. About 10% of abortions occur during the second trimester (6% in weeks 13-15 and 4% by week 20). After 24 weeks or pregnancy, abortions are only provided due to serious health reasons (and account for less than 1% of total abortions). Earlier abortions are easier, safer, and tend to be less expensive than abortions taking place later in a pregnancy.
Originally posted by stupid girl
I'm 100% pro-gun rights, but a retaliatory argument based on publishing medical information is idiotic.edit on 4-1-2013 by stupid girl because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kthxbai
Originally posted by Vidpci
reply to post by tothetenthpower
Yes getting an abortion is just a danger to the child that you're about to murder.
You can't have an abortion after a child is born. Before it is born, it's a fetus, not a child. There's also a limit on how far along you can be when having an abortion.
In coulter's case, we should extend that limit to ...however old she is, 60 maybe? She certainly looks it.
There is nothing wrong with abortion firstly & secondly it is about time certain Americans grew up, running about like little babies "i have a right to a gun"