Originally posted by SpaDe_
Yes you are allowed the right to life, but when your life threatens mine I am allowed to use force to defend my inalienable rights. Firearms are not
exclusive to what you claim as an argument against these rights. You could remove gun from that statement and insert any other weapon and your
argument would be the same.
EXACTLY. Our own hands are weapons that are fully capable of taking a life in the defense of our own. The problem is that when the government wants to
take more of your Rights away, you won't be able to do a damn thing because they're strapped with AR's and .40's while you have your baseball bat:
Enjoy death, liberal.
Otherwise, if EVERYONE was disarmed, including the government, all one would need is a bit of Krav Maga and to outweigh you by 30lbs of muscle mass
and you wouldn't stand a chance. Therefore, the argument that guns are what kill people is pure poppycock. People kill people, period. If that's the
argument, then you need to be against gyms, bows and arrows, baseball bats, sticks, metal pipes, BB guns, pellet guns, marbles, potato guns, potatoes,
and even toasters and hair dryers. I can probably think up about 1,000 more household items that I could use to kill someone with...but a gun has
always been and ALWAYS WILL BE my defense against anyone wielding any of the aforementioned items in a threatening manner to myself or my family.
Liberals need to keep their own words and decisions in check and give up whatever they want to give up. I'm not drinking their koolaid, nor eating
their silver spoon of #, nor cascading over the cliff with the blind Sheeple (Sheep People.) I'll keep my GOD GIVEN RIGHTS and that's that. No one
will ever tell me, or some 225,000,000 other Americans to do anything we don't really want to do and violate our core values and beliefs.