It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grainofsand
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
I wouldn't expect the British to understand, as Big Brother is constantly watching you and you all excepted it with open arms.
Rather pathethic generalisation of 60+ million people, but hey what do I know, I'm just one Brit who didn't accept it with open arms.
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
I was referring to British CCTV. That is something we do not have.
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
Originally posted by grainofsand
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
I wouldn't expect the British to understand, as Big Brother is constantly watching you and you all excepted it with open arms.
Rather pathethic generalisation of 60+ million people, but hey what do I know, I'm just one Brit who didn't accept it with open arms.
And yet, your CCTV is still there.
And yet, your CCTV is still there.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by LewsTherinThelamon
Well then how do you think we should ensure that paedophiles and criminals do not get to work in our schools or in other jobs where they could do harm.
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by LewsTherinThelamon
Wow typical "screw you Jack I.m doing fine" attitude.
You don't care about pedos...................what a lovely human being you are.
Use your brain and think why we have to check (UK and the USA) it is to protect people, or do you not care about protecting people?edit on 5-1-2013 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)
Nice, hopefully you will learn the difference between excepted and accepted (as in your earlier post) when you teach her English lol
Originally posted by grainofsand
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
I was referring to British CCTV. That is something we do not have.
Irrelevant to a debate about background checks for employees working with vulnerable people though.
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by LewsTherinThelamon
Well then how do you think we should ensure that paedophiles and criminals do not get to work in our schools or in other jobs where they could do harm.
The difference between you and I is that you will always be a victim. That is why you need people to take care of you, you're like a babe wondering through a terrifying environment where any boogeyman can reach out and grab you at any moment. Your motivation is fear, and such is obvious from your opinion. Being free is frightening with all the things that can hurt you.
Big deal.
Myself, and my family, are not going to be controlled by fear. It is that simple. My daughter can learn to defend herself and kick butt. She will be homeschooled, other peoples children are their concern. Not mine.
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
Originally posted by grainofsand
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
I was referring to British CCTV. That is something we do not have.
Irrelevant to a debate about background checks for employees working with vulnerable people though.
Not really, it was backing my point about anyone British not understanding my opinion. It all falls under the umbrella of safety.
Really for all you know I might served 8 years in the British Parachute Regiment and I am trained in martial arts.
But regardless
I can look after myself.
I do not live in fear.
Please stop with these stupid assumptions.
And you never answered my question.
Your personal life choices are irrelevant to this debate, I shall assume after homeschooling though you will equally refuse to use any state sanctioned exam boards to demonstrate the academic level said homeschooling will achieve. Good luck to your daughter chasing any future profession while avoiding anything educationally influenced by the state.
You assert much without substance. Fear? boogeyman? etc, all rather silly, but hey that's your opinion - thankfully most readers will see it as unsubstantiated generalisation to be dismissed as such.
People should not be screened by the state, or anyone else. If you commit a crime and are punished for it, carrying a record to wear as a scarlet letter does not "rehabilitate" a person. It keeps a stigma attached to them for the rest of their lives, making finding work difficult. I have seen it happen to many felons.
They should be allowed to start with a clean slate.
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
If you commit a crime and are punished for it, carrying a record to wear as a scarlet letter does not "rehabilitate" a person. It keeps a stigma attached to them for the rest of their lives, making finding work difficult. I have seen it happen to many felons.
They should be allowed to start with a clean slate.
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by LewsTherinThelamon
You may be a selfish person but many of us care about others in our society, your attitude amazes me that people can be so selfish and uncaring.
Oh and your attempts to slag of Britain is just ill informed and wrong.
[/yawn] More childlike generalisations about 60+ million people - good luck with being impartial in your geography/social studies element of your homeschooling mission lol
Originally posted by LewsTherinThelamon
Get rid of paedophilia by finding out its root cause. Whether the cause is sociological, psychological, biological, or a mix is up to research to determine.