It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maxmars
CRB errors mean thousands wrongly branded as criminals
news.techeye.net
(visit the link for the full news article)
Nearly 12,000 people have been wrongly branded as criminals over the past five years as a result of irrelevant or inaccurate information disclosed during criminal record checks.
According to the latest from Big Brother Watch, 11,893 people successfully challenged their CRB results after being branded as criminals - forcing the government to shell out £1.98 million in redress.
Originally posted by Maxmars
CRB errors mean thousands wrongly branded as criminals
news.techeye.net
(visit the link for the full news article)
Nearly 12,000 people have been wrongly branded as criminals over the past five years as a result of irrelevant or inaccurate information disclosed during criminal record checks.
According to the latest from Big Brother Watch, 11,893 people successfully challenged their CRB results after being branded as criminals - forcing the government to shell out £1.98 million in redress.
Originally posted by Maxmars
I remember with fondness, the continuous arguments of the fear peddlers and government control freaks "You've nothing to fear, if you've done no wrong."
yet ... the pudding has proven otherwise - hasn't it?
CRB checks are regularly carried out for employment applications, especially for those looking to work with children or in the medical sector.
Details are then sent directly to current or potential employers, meaning that any black mark could be detrimental.
The stats show 4,196 people challenged information held by a local police force, while 3,519 people were given the wrong person’s criminal record. A further 4,088 people were also claimed to have found inaccurate information or a potential wrong identity on police national computers.
Big Data is being pushed out of it's potential for exploitation (commercial, of course) BUT it is being marketed to us "regular folk" as "AOK" when in fact, the parking place for "big data" seems to be littered with garbage.
When you receive no feedback from inquiry onto a position; when your loan get's rejected, when you find a permit inexplicably not forthcoming.... it's on you to locate their error and correct it... they are - apparently - allowed to hold erroneous information about you...
Nothing to fear? I think the evidence clearly speaks for itself....
This isn't the first time such checks have come under fire. In February last year, The Telegraph revealed that around 20,000 people had been wrongly labelled as criminals or accused of more serious offences because of blunders by the police and the CRB, since 2003.
Coming to America soon (I promise)..... you're a criminal.... until and unless YOU prove otherwise....
news.techeye.net
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by stumason
Surely the fact that those wrongly fingered by CRB checks not only challenged them but also got redress indicates that there are adequate checks and balances.
Or would you rather have a situation where employers are unable to verify that people applying for positions with access to children or other vulnerable people are actually safe to do so? We've had quite a few child murders and serious assaults prior to the CRB's being introduced by people who specifically sought out those roles in order to gain access to the persons they target.
Also, bear in mind that 11,000 out of millions of people over a 5 year period is actually a rather small number. In any system, mistakes will be made and it is quite misleading to try and paint it as anything else.
Once again, the OP is using something that they don't really understand to try and prove some sort of peculiar point, just like the thread about the LCP.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Considering this has now been commented on twice; may I impose upon someone to explain what it is - exactly - that I don't understand? And - as a matter of principle - would it not be easier to explain it, rather than attribute ignorance to the OP?
Or is there some other point topic-wise that is being made here - especially in regards to my contribution?
What agenda do you see me promoting?edit on 4-1-2013 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Zcustosmorum
So it doesn't actually matter if you spout anti-government thoughts on a social network site, they'll throw you in jail anyway
Even if you're not regarded as a verbal terrorist folks, we're ALL in danger
Originally posted by Maxmars
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
I have seen officers act upon the writs and warrants issued with no regard for the dignity or personal security of the "suspect" - always presuming they are as guilty as guilty can be.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
It was not inaccurate, SIS is MI6 and the member (who I won’t name) was not aware of this basic fact yet assumed to have an informed opinion on SIS.
It might seem off-topic, but I don’t think it is what I was doing above was demonstrating something that happens all the time on ATS and appalling it to this thread.
11,000 mistakes over a 5 year period in which millions of CRB applications are filed really is not that bad, its by no means bad but it does not mean that the uk has adopted a judicial system where you are “guilty until proven innocent” and furthermore it does not mean that this mythical judicial system is coming to America soon as the OP states.