Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

UFO Seen From Plane

page: 10
98
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by zeeon

Those are pretty specific details and you guys are posting around a statue in BRAZIL no where near where the WITNESS said they were.

Now I have provided evidence to suggest that either A.) The witness was incorrect about what flight they were on or B.) the witness made up the whole story and forgot to fact check that a flight from Flordia to Philly on Spirit Airlines was actually running that day.

What is least probable is that they were half a contient away over Brazil just in time to film the statue lighting up.

In fact if you read the comments underneath the video the poster was asked for the flight number several times and was unable/unwilling to provide it. So I call BS...




posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:25 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Wide-Eyes
 


Depends. Usually I guess? It's not necessary with the advent of LEDs, but I'm guessing the revolver is for actually indicating a specific kind of light. In this case, from a light house.

But the fact still remains that it looks like all it is, is a light on top of a hill.

That means it could be anything from a flare, to a car, to a helipad, to a building, to a hospital, to an office, to a military target, to a ufo. The options are many. To go for aliens, just because it looks cinematic, is sort of unnecessary.



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:26 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


It is not on a UFO on the mountain, since they were flying over the ocean. Only man made thing i could remember was Oil platform. Maybe those lights were navigation or collision lights on the platform...



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:28 PM
link   
Reply to wrong poster / deleted.
edit on 4-1-2013 by zeeon because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by merkins
Hopefully someone else has pointed this out already but just in case....

My first reaction was that this was a statue on the top of a mountain lit up blue, something like the christ statue in Rio.. So i searched for "christ, rio and blue' and came up with the following. And guess what?

dunyanews.tv...

SO WE HAVE A LIAR ON YOUTUBE. WHO'DVE guessed.

Any date descrepencies can be put down to testing/rehearsal/installation.

Theres plenty of precedent for this and many youtube videos showing the blue and even pink lights.

Just once I'd like a genuine mystery and not ignorant believers without critical thinking skills.
edit on 4-1-2013 by merkins because: Remove accusation of liar in thread
edit on 4-1-2013 by merkins because: (no reason given)


Seems like a good explanation, funny thing is the youtube uploader insisted that the object was stationary.



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:28 PM
link   
reply to post by zeeon
 


My best guess based on the evidence at hand (or the lack thereof) is that brother flew into La Guardia on his way home to Philly, and what we are seeing in the video is on top of one of these buildings...



Talk about a needle in a haystack.



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:29 PM
link   
Why do UFOs have lights... wouldn't they try not to be detected? Good video thanks for posting.



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:30 PM
link   
Seems with a few Google searches, I was able to determine that blue lights are used in the marine field, for navigation lights (starboard side in place of green), and for navigation aids along the ocean. Here is one such light that happens to be solar powered (which is irrelevant for us here), but shows that a blue sea navigation light is possible.

Solar Navigation Light Ok702-5 Blue

If, on the landing track, there was an outcrop of rock, that had a blue warning light, this is what he recorded out the _ If we knew the final destination/airport where they landed this plane, then it could be investigated further in that exact area and landing flight paths near that airport.



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:31 PM
link   
One more thing to the naysayers who are protecting this video as if it were their first born child......UFO investigators DO look into these videos when presented with them and most have decades of experiences. I personally have ten years.

Not too many videos of interest get pass them. So if this were anything of substance like: the O'Hare UFO or the Chinese airport UFO or the countless of other videos, this will get it's due-diligence of attention.
But because this has NOT made the "OMG/WTF" rounds in the world of UFOlogy, one has to assume, this is bogus.

And to any layman who uses the minimum debunking tools put forth, you too would see this is very much most likely, a hoax.

And to the whipper-snapper who referred to me a wise-guy (guy who is wise) Thank you!



Merkins can also be totally correct in assuming this is that Rio statue but to say that opposed to just saying it isn't a UFO, calls for too much speculation and personally, it's not worth it for me.

This is not a flying UFO captured by someone's brother (who just COULDN'T possibly keep the secret any longer
) who just happened to be filming random clouds when he stumbled on this blue mysterious object. The more I think about this (and what was written about it) the more it couldn't be anymore cheesier. The 'brother' really killed it for the video-brother and his pissed-off sounding nieces!



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Todzer
Nine pages in and no Phage? It must be real


Yep, he only appears when he has the answers.

I've seen this color blue on a triangle craft but it was in the center of it, not on the tips. Also it looks like a TR-3B triangle craft, but the light is on top vs on the bottom, which is how I've seen them.

This doesn't make sense if it's a TR-3B type craft, unless it's flying upside down.
It is the correct Steven Speilberg blue color for the triangle crafts though.



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by zeeon

Are you seriously so blonde that you can't read posts? Because I already fact checked that and provided evidence that Spirit Airlines wasn't running a flight from Florida to Philly on the date provided. Check my post here

Some people, jeeze.


i did read, and i got the impression that you STILL refuse to believe that they are lying.

the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one.




What is least probable is that they were half a contient away over Brazil just in time to film the statue lighting up.
edit on 1/4/2013 by homeskillet because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by zeeon
reply to post by Toxicsurf
 


You guys do realize that the witness said they were on a flight to Philadelphia from Florida on Spirit Airlines.
Those are pretty specific details and you guys are posting around a statue in BRAZIL no where near where the WITNESS said they were.

Now I have provided evidence to suggest that either A.) The witness was incorrect about what flight they were on or B.) the witness made up the whole story and forgot to fact check that a flight from Flordia to Philly on Spirit Airlines was actually running that day.

What is least probable is that they were half a contient away over Brazil just in time to film the statue lighting up.



Do you realize this is one witness removed?

The 'witness' (the person filming) didn't say diddly. His 'brother' is doing all the writing. The 'brother' is the one who couldn't keep this a secret anymore and told of this flight and UFO sighting of his brothers/nieces.

The 'brother' put this flight on a Florida to Philly route last week. We didn't see any ticket. We didn't even see any date.

Like many of us are saying, this little 20-second video leaves us more questions than conclusion.

edit on 4-1-2013 by Human_Alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Krakatoa
 


Don't they all blink though?



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:36 PM
link   
I'm guessing it's the guys from ringsider report. They cover boxing, wrestling, and ufo's, lol. They are always hyping stuff and then going to flordia to see a dead body, and said it was bs when they get there and their source tricked them. LOL. I would bet my left gonad that it's these guys since they are into UFO's and know tommy dreamer. LOL.

I also would guess 100% that the know what this man made structure peaking through the clouds is.



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:38 PM
link   
You say it's near Philly?

Check out the shape of the top of Two Liberty Place, which is lit-up at night.



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:39 PM
link   
Im saying this is Not a Hoax, I have no answer or Fact as to why. I would just rather believe it was the truth, then make up or try and sound like I could debunk something, that No one has the anwers too, except the Photographer.

Peace Out



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by homeskillet
i did read, and i got the impression that you STILL refuse to believe that they are lying.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one.


Then you need to work on your reading comprehension skills mate. I clearly provided evidence that it is quite improbable they were on a flight that didn't exist.

With that being said, it is also quite improbable, that OUT OF THE WHOLE WORLD they just happened to be flying over brazil, at the right time of day, at the right altitude and at the right angle to film a one of a kind statue.

Your lack of logical analysis is disturbing



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Please refer to my post Here

What I was saying, and what very few posters seem to be able to understand is while it is unlikely the facts presented are true, it also highly unlikely that they flew over the statue in brazil. I could pick atleast a hundred places throughout the world where things poke through clouds, including buildings, mountain tops, radio stations on top of mounts, etc.



posted on Jan, 4 2013 @ 12:48 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


Why do people always associate an optical phenomenon with a U.F.O? how do we know for sure it was an object? that looks to me like its just an atmospheric optical phenomenon





new topics

top topics



 
98
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join