NASA and their 'Contrail' Web Site

page: 4
13
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 21 2013 @ 03:40 AM
link   
reply to post by alleyez
 


NASA needs o pay attention to their own rocket testing facility, because you think it causes chemtrails??


Or is the video "powerful" powerful because the rockets are powerful??
Or is it because it is presented by a comedian??




posted on Feb, 21 2013 @ 03:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by bigdohbeatdown
 


You won't find any willing airlines. Weight is money, and they aren't going to throw money away. The modifications they'd have to make cost weight, and that means less cargo and fewer passengers. And if they tried to run it through the engines as many people claim they do that means more frequent engine changes, which is an obscene amount of money per engine (upwards of $20M per engine depending on type).


They'd be willing if they were paid. der.



posted on Feb, 21 2013 @ 03:49 AM
link   
reply to post by bigdohbeatdown
 


Yep - so where is the money trail??

Come on - front up with some verifiable evidence to support some of these claims - any f them...heck just one would be a start!!



posted on Feb, 21 2013 @ 07:37 AM
link   
reply to post by bigdohbeatdown
 


There would have to be a pretty big amount of money, because the airlines are all hurting. We're talking huge, easily traceable money here. You don't just hide $20+ million.





 
13
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join