"Rayner told reporters it looked as if the Hendrick plane slashed through the treetops for about 100 feet before crashing into the southeast face of
Bull Mountain. The impact left a crater in the mountainside, and remnants were thrown another 100 feet."
Now obviously, this is a smaller plane which has something to do with it...but the plane smashed into a mountain side (simple physics, shouldn't
hitting a non-horizontal plane increase the radius of the debris field?), left a crater, and yet the debris only spread 100 feet. Yes, 100 feet.
Now, Flight 93 debris was found 8 miles from the "crash" site. Bigger plane, I know - but 100 feet versus 8 miles? The debris from Flight 93's
supposed crash spread approximately 400 times further than the NASCAR plane if you believe that to be true. I've never heard of a simple crash
creating a debris field that large.
More comparative evidence that Flight 93 was indeed shot down?
|
that in no way what so ever proves that flight 93 was shot down...
HOW does it ?
this is one of the most absurd things that I have read in my one year at ATS...
there's no comparison of the two crashes....
|
It doesn't "prove" anything, but it's hard to believe that one plane crash, hitting a mountain, spreads its debris only 100 feet, and another one,
crashing into the ground, spreads it 8 miles. Maybe you have an easy time believing that but it doesn't add up to me.
|
 Originally posted by Paranoid Freak
It doesn't "prove" anything, but it's hard to believe that one plane crash, hitting a mountain, spreads its debris only 100 feet, and another one,
crashing into the ground, spreads it 8 miles. Maybe you have an easy time believing that but it doesn't add up to me. 
I am now convinced that Slim Shady aka Eminem had somthing to do with that crash of flight 93 and the 8 mile debris path.
Wasn't he from 8 mile and didn't he release a Movie called 8 mile. Who's on this with me?  
|
isnt this just simple physics? if the plane hits a mountain,the mountains going to prevent debris from being thrown forward? sure some debris will
fall back down/get thrown up the mountain/out to the sides but any debris hitting the mountain has almost instantly lost its momentum,there for will
pretty much stop instantly.
A large aircraft hitting flat ground has the chance of bouncing,rolling etc and therefore would travel further+ theres the extra weight ratios thrown
in- carrying parts with more forward knetic energy and smaller parts thrown into the air can be carried by the wind.
i dont think theres anything dodgy about this at all.
Regards.
|
