It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Preacher76
They use tragedy to push political agenda's forward (which is down right disgusting in my opinion).
Originally posted by RedmoonMWC
reply to post by Ghost375
What the OP is refering to is the continualy one-sided compromises.
That is not compromise, and the current proposed Bill is not the same one that just expired.
Originally posted by Ghost375
and most pro-gun people used the tragedy in China involving knives to push their political agenda forward...both sides are guilty of your accusation.
Originally posted by Ghost375
The thing is the bills being proposed have already been in place before for 10 years, from 1994-2004. I like guns, and think assault rifles are pretty bad ass. Do we need them though? Not really. So should we compromise to shut them up? So they don't have anything to say next time a shooting takes place?
We're a nation of people with many different viewpoints. Compromise IS necessary, and it's actually a good thing.