It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Wasn't the whole point of them posting the names and home addresses of gun owners that guns in the hands of private individuals is not a good thing? Therefore hiring professionals who are armed wouldn't be the same thing at all. Having gotten threats from "law abiding" gun owners also
I believe that the newspaper received mail with a white powdery substance in it. It turned out to be harmless, but it was an obvious message, and may have been considered a threat.
I too am disgusted that they thought it was a good idea to publish what they did, but the employees, are just following higher orders and I hope that they are not harmed in any way for this.
The story says the reporter who wrote it has a pistol permit; is he on the map?
No. He is not licensed to carry his gun by Westchester or Rockland counties, the only counties covered on the map.
Originally posted by iwilliam
Wait... so they "outed" gun owners (presumably because they're anti-gun and were trying to make a point) and then when they get negative feedback, and worry that they might not be safe, they suddenly want guns around them, for their own protection?
If these assumptions are true, these people are some of the worst kind of hypocrites.
Originally posted by FmrBBJarhead
reply to post by Computron
Ironic and laughable to be sure. Poses some interesting questions in my mind however; where were the names and addresses of gun owners so readily available that they could be found and published in the first place? Perhaps New Jersey has gun laws that require this type public access and release of information.
It is disturbing that a segment of our population can foster such views and feel entitled to openly publish this information. (Recklessly in my opinion) It is more disturbing still that they somehow had access to this information to publish it in the first place! IDK, Thoughts? Am I missing something?
Originally posted by JarheadFidelis
I read this yesterday on an internet news site. Talk about hypocrisy! Demonizing gun owners and treating them as criminals, yet hiring armed security when your address is posted? I guess they didnt like having to walk in the gun owners shoes. Imagine that.
Originally posted by okachobi
So their names and addresses are a matter of public record due to gun registration and they are pissed that a newspaper published them? Isn't that like getting pissed off at the phone book? They should be thanking the paper for pointing out their ignorance and belief in security through obscurity- which is no security at all.
If these records weren't public they'd have some basis for their complaints.
Originally posted by JarheadFidelis
reply to post by alfa1
Maybe its another way for them to call attention to gun owners and demonize them more.