It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Intelligent Design Venn Diagram

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 06:34 PM
While doing a tad of research on 'cognitive dissonance' I came across the following and just had to share it...

Have fun....

posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 06:57 PM
How funny. Thanks for the laugh. On the other topic, cognitive dissonance is really interesting and a very under-discussed aspect of how conspiracies and false flags can happen relatively in the open and still be allowed to go on. The conspirators take advantage of that for sure.

What's "easier?" (and by that I mean emotionally and cognitively) To believe that 19 hijackers took down the WTC in the most militarily and technologically advanced country in the world and 3 buildings built to withstand disaster, one of which wasn't even hit, fell neatly into their own footprints? Or that the buildings were wired for demolition, and 9/11 was an inside job by a shadowy group that controls governments?

That Jerry Sandusky (or Jimmy Saville) is the sole truly guilty party in pedophilic acts that went on for more than a decade? Or that they were a part of a much larger pedophilic and ritual abuse system that goes far deeper than most people want to think and happen to be the public scapegoats?

That it is always "one lone shooter" that was mentally ill, despite many inconsistencies? Or that those types of things are well organized and are at least 3 person teams (eyewitness reports of at least 2 shooters in Aurora, 4 in Wisconsin, 3 in Sandy Hook)?

Yes, cognitive dissonance is an interesting thing in these circles.

edit on 2-1-2013 by coyotepoet because: (no reason given)


log in