Lawyer says 3 shooters were involved at Sandy Hook.

Michael Shrimpton, a lawyer involved in national security and constitutional law believes there were 3 shooters involved. Link
Nothing more has been said about the suspect captured in the woods or the other individual, "proned" outside the school. It's amazing to me how events can happen in broad daylight like this and then can be swept under the rug like they didn't happen at all.

reply to post by sqorpius


For a government controlled conspiracy they sure are letting a lot of "hints" slip out for conspiracy theorist to "catch".

So let me get this straight. The government is so good at hiding events that they can commit atrocities in broad daylight, but not good enough to fool internet posters?

Wow, I was just going to start this same thread when I saw that article on that other site just now...

Excellent points made and more evidence that the OS just doesn't add up.

Not sure I see the relevence.
So he has a job as a lawyer. And the point is...?

reply to post by sqorpius


Who is he representing? It sounds like this would give him a job and without it he would have none so his interest might be financial as well as fame. You have to consider this. For a bunch of skeptics who want to see the whites of the aliens eyes, before believing anything and even then, chalking it up to cgi, people are really falling hook line and sinker.

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by sqorpius

 

For a government controlled conspiracy they sure are letting a lot of "hints" slip out for conspiracy theorist to "catch".

So let me get this straight. The government is so good at hiding events that they can commit atrocities in broad daylight, but not good enough to fool internet posters?

Maybe cause it's the "internet posters" and a small number of other individuals who are the only ones continuing to ask the probing questions about this event.

reply to post by sqorpius


Ive been waiting to hear about the other 2 people. Lets see where this leads.....

reply to post by sqorpius

Maybe cause it's the "internet posters" and a small number of other individuals who are the only ones continuing to ask the probing questions about this event.

What questions? I have heard some pretty stupid ones being asked, as if the government knows everything about a situation they can only view in retrospect.

Its pretty vague and almost all speculation.

The only thing definitive that he reported was that the Russians were NOT watching. Ok! now we can move on.

The "article" on PressTV says in a nutshell "A lawyer guy has an opinion that there were 3 people involved" and yet presents absolutely no evidence. For that matter, they don't present anything other than a statement.

Huh?

Edit to add:

“The Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was the work of three. I say again three shooters. It’s possible that Adam Lanza was one of those three, although there is some doubt about that. Some people within the intelligence community don’t accept… I think he was involved,” Michael Shrimpton told Press TV’s U.S. Desk on Tuesday.

Seriously?

Well, Hi... I'm Djarums... I'm an expert in online forums. I think a renegade troupe of barnyard animals were involved in the shooting. Evidence? Who cares. I said so!

Standards sure do drop straight down to the toilet when it comes to PressTV huh?

Two or three shooters makes sense but he needs to provide more evidence before blaming it on the Latin Kings gang.

reply to post by CosmicCitizen


Im waiting on that evidence as well. But I do remember hearing on the news that they had caught one person in the woods. Then it kind of went away.

my wife has contacts in a local school district. she texted me that day that there were 2 shooters, 1 was dead and 1 was loose. she was freaking out our kids school were in lockdown, and the roads were closed, she couldn't pick them up

then she texted my they caught the 2nd shooter

I wonder if the confusion was from the shooter having his brothers ID


the "proned" guy was a hunter who was in the wrong place at the wrong time if i'm not mistaken.

I don't know if it is this guy, seems he may have a decent educated guess on the matter?

Link

Shrimpton is a “wannabe” Crackpot Realist who craves to hang about with the big boy’s and go along with their madness—typical of those who hang around these circles spreading disinformation, propaganda and conspiracy theories.

Maybe someone else can actually read the above article and set me right. It at least seems to be well written but I've kind of had enough of this conspiracy BS for right now. At this point someone claiming to be a "specialist in Constitutional law" automatically means "crackpot" to me. I guess I've been totally scared straight by these utterly delusional Sandy Hook conspiracies.

You do realize that this info only comes from 1 source which is PressTv?

PressTV is the English speaking news network of state-owned media corporation Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting.

Do what you want with this.

:shk:

Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by sqorpius

 

For a government controlled conspiracy they sure are letting a lot of "hints" slip out for conspiracy theorist to "catch".

So let me get this straight. The government is so good at hiding events that they can commit atrocities in broad daylight, but not good enough to fool internet posters?

Maybe they were meant to be 'caught'. Or, if this is a conspiracy, the more people involved, the harder it is to keep the facts straight.

Brings to mind the issue of obamas' 'birth certificate'. It was disassembled in a pdf creator. I find it hard to believe TPTB can't create a decent forgery.

I personally will look at any evidence before discrediting it. Things aren't always as they seem.

Originally posted by FinalCountdown
Wow, I was just going to start this same thread when I saw that article on that other site just now...

Excellent points made and more evidence that the OS just doesn't add up.

By OS you mean "Official Story"?? If so, Id love to hear where you got hte official story since one hasnt been released yet and wont be for months...

from presstv article...

A family spokesman confirmed that Adam's father, Peter, claimed his son's body and that "private arrangements" for burial took place over the weekend

this is the first time i've seen a confirmation that peter lanza was indeed the father.

did i miss something??