It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by adjensen
Maybe we should petition ATS to do away with the religious forums.
Or maybe you should just find another forum to hang out in and leave the religious forums to the... you know... people who enjoy sensible discussions about religion.
If you are trying to say that I or anyone else is not allowed to speak their mind here, then you know what you can do. How about instead of trolling, you either contribute to the topic or stay out of that thread.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by WanDash
if the science behind the OP is dead-on
... it isn't, as it doesn't account for those who are religious and were not raised in religious homes, such as myself.
It's just the usual "these people think differently than I do, so there must be something wrong with them" nonsense that some use to comfort themselves.
You don't have to be raised in religious homes to build religious neurons. How many musicians learned how to play a musical instrument later on in life. This isn't magic. The brain must build neurons for the musician to remember how to play that instrument.
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by akushla99
...define, 'fanatic', and question whether it relates to yourself
"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" Winston Churchill
A99
Don't know who this is directed toward, but if it's me, I have changed my mind several times. And, several times because of the conversations here. If the logic is there I can easily change my mind.
...just having a bit of fun...
...logic fanatic?
A99
Hey Jig~ Hope this isn't considered to stray too far off topic and you find it somewhat relative to your OP.
Originally posted by adjensen
And did it occur to you that the converse might be true? That your stubborn dislike of people of faith might be an irrational learned behaviour?
I agree, it isn't magic. There's something fundamentally wrong with someone who obsessively rails against a being that he says doesn't exist and derives pleasure from trying to make other people unhappy.
Originally posted by guitarplayer
So what was this earth shattering or should I say God shattering question you asked if I myself may ask you?
Originally posted by adjensen
... it isn't, as it doesn't account for those who are religious and were not raised in religious homes, such as myself.
It's just the usual "these people think differently than I do, so there must be something wrong with them" nonsense that some use to comfort themselves.
Originally posted by jiggerj
This puts me in league with Dawkins, Hitchins, and Harris. Thanks!
Originally posted by Bone75
reply to post by jiggerj
Interesting title, one could say that you yourself are a fanatic who can't see the absurdity in his beliefs. By your logic, no one should believe anything because belief is where learning stops.
So tell me what's the point of learning anything if you refuse to believe anything you learn?
Originally posted by maes2
reply to post by jiggerj
Jesus was not crucified. God saved him alive to the skies.
even if he was crucified and ascent from his grave, it is possible and my wisdom deduces that the first creator is far more powerful.
fanaticism, mistranslated divine books and corrupted clerics have nothing to do with God. he does not need that I defend him. he is inside of every people and even pure wisdom can witness it's existence.
Originally posted by Bone75
reply to post by jiggerj
Interesting title, one could say that you yourself are a fanatic who can't see the absurdity in his beliefs. By your logic, no one should believe anything because belief is where learning stops.
So tell me what's the point of learning anything if you refuse to believe anything you learn?
Originally posted by cartesia
Originally posted by Bone75
reply to post by jiggerj
Interesting title, one could say that you yourself are a fanatic who can't see the absurdity in his beliefs. By your logic, no one should believe anything because belief is where learning stops.
So tell me what's the point of learning anything if you refuse to believe anything you learn?
Scientists don't believe in science, they develop models that seem to fit. they acquire data that backs up claims.
science isnt about believing, its about knowing or being able to determine something. This is often a point that religious people fail to understand. its also often a point that many claimed science-based thinkers fail to understand. The point is science is not a belief that something is so, its more like 'these experiments have shown suchandsuch. Some people take it to the level that they believe the explanation will apply to all future situations in which the same phenomenon is seen, but this is not something that can be proven - its a perfect example of the difference between believing and knowing.
Originally posted by watchitburn
I like it.
It sounds reasonable to me, and it would explain why it is almost impossible to have an objective conversation with religious people.
Or democrats and republicans for that matter.