posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 04:57 PM
Originally posted by JarheadFidelis
reply to post by magma
Seems to me that he should be pissed off at the woman. She seems to be the one pushing the child support issue.
did you even read the article? i don't see where the woman is the one pushing for this.
When Ms Bauer and Ms Schreiner filed for state assistance
this year, the state demanded the donor's name so it could collect child support for the now three-year-old girl. Read more:
the STATE in other words the GOVERNMENT, is the one that started this and is the one pursuing this. the only thing the woman seems to have done was to
file for assistance, it is the state that is looking for child support not her. yet again the government sticking it's nose into the private affairs
of citizens. sadly it would have been better if she had LIED and said she had no clue who the father was. really sad state of affairs when a lie would
have perhaps been the RIGHT thing to do.
this type of thing is even worse when you consider what else might have happened. it could have been an abused lady on the run from her husband, in
which case the demand for child support would give him a good place to start looking for her. quite possibly to kill her and/or kill or kidnap the
so even trying to help someone who can not conceive a child and yet may for reasons like only wanting things done naturally and thus artificial
insemination is out, can put you in a jam years later even when signing away any involvement in that child's life. wonder what would happen in a case
of a woman having a child for someone who could not? would the government ALSO go after HER for child support being the "birth mother". what does
this mean for someone who has put a child up for adoption can they also be hit up for child support?
i guess one lesson we can learn from this, is that yet again it proves in today's society you better NOT HELP anyone or you might get screwed in the
end. such a nice society we live in isn't it.