It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Give me one...just one valid reason a citizen needs to own an assault weapon!
Seeing as how you are the judge of "valid" why should anyone waste their time?
Oh for gods sake really? This is a discussion site is it not?...Don't be obtuse.
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
reply to post by whatsecret
Give me one...just one valid reason a citizen needs to own an assault weapon! Assault weapons are designed for the purpose of killing as many individuals in a short span of time rather than a rifle which is not. I agree if someone wants to kill they will find any means to do so, but why make it easier for them when there is no reason for that type of weapon in a society if you are not in the military on the front lines. Don't tell me people hunt with it either because that is Horse S**T.
edit on 1/3/2013 by CaptGizmo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Give me one...just one valid reason a citizen needs to own an assault weapon!
Seeing as how you are the judge of "valid" why should anyone waste their time?
Oh for gods sake really? This is a discussion site is it not?...Don't be obtuse.
It's not obtuse. It's reality. There isnt a single reason anyone could give you that you would deem valid. You know it.
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Do you agree that IRAN should have nuclear weapons...or North Korea? For that matter what about terrorists? Should they be able to own nuclear weapons or guns to kill with? They claim they are defending against us! If we follow your way of thinking then your answer would surely be yes would it not?edit on 1/3/2013 by CaptGizmo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by whatsecret
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Do you agree that IRAN should have nuclear weapons...or North Korea? For that matter what about terrorists? Should they be able to own nuclear weapons or guns to kill with? They claim they are defending against us! If we follow your way of thinking then your answer would surely be yes would it not?edit on 1/3/2013 by CaptGizmo because: (no reason given)
Being a terrorist is illegal, so we should ban terrorist and im not trying to be funny. A terrorist with a box cutter or handgun, or bombs up their as$ is the same thing - illegal!
What country with nuclear weapons were invaded in the last 50 years? I can't think of a single one, i hope you can educate me on this. Because to me it appears that just having them (not using) keeps countries safer for their citizens. Do you disagree?
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Originally posted by whatsecret
Originally posted by CaptGizmo
Do you agree that IRAN should have nuclear weapons...or North Korea? For that matter what about terrorists? Should they be able to own nuclear weapons or guns to kill with? They claim they are defending against us! If we follow your way of thinking then your answer would surely be yes would it not?edit on 1/3/2013 by CaptGizmo because: (no reason given)
Being a terrorist is illegal, so we should ban terrorist and im not trying to be funny. A terrorist with a box cutter or handgun, or bombs up their as$ is the same thing - illegal!
What country with nuclear weapons were invaded in the last 50 years? I can't think of a single one, i hope you can educate me on this. Because to me it appears that just having them (not using) keeps countries safer for their citizens. Do you disagree?
Did or did not George W Bush start a war over Iraq possesing nukes which we now know was a lie. Who is the terrorist now? I am pretty sure that the kid that killed all of thos kids was not a terrorist UNTIL he shot all of them.edit on 1/3/2013 by CaptGizmo because: (no reason given)
My answer would be no. Just because you want something does not automatically give you the right to have it. That is why the society has laws to govern by
How would you know if someone had intentions on hurting anyone when they buy the gun unless they are put through an extensive background check, or they were acting insane, or take Ted Bundy for example.
why all the incredible opposition from the NRA and gun advocates against background checks and 3 day waiting periods. I mean 3 days, why do they argue about 3 days for a killing device.
Would you say that citizens should be able to have any of these guns they want in defense of their homes and rights?
I see no problem with going to range an renting them to shoot for fun. I simply do not see the reason for owning an assault weapon since it is clearly an weapon designed for offensive reasons unlike say a shotgun.
a shotgun. I think if i was wanting to protect my family and home then that would be the most logical choice.
Well as far as the assault weapon goes, I guess we will have to agree to disagree.