posted on Jan, 2 2013 @ 04:36 PM
Originally posted by dianashay
*and in regards to taking the words of a 'warlord' seriously, well all I can say about that is if it isn't taken seriously then why is it on the front
page of the Telegraph?
If you take the Telegraph as your absolute truth of the state of affairs, here is another quote you may like to consider:
The Ministry of Defence has dismissed claims by an Afghan warlord that Prince Harry kills insurgents while "drunk" as simply absurd.
...does that make it true?
It's a bit quiet here on ATS at the moment so I shall wait for the overnight explosion of comments when our US friends have some time to waste
I look forward to seeing points expressed without the unsubstantiated emotional bias so often found in this forum, but I expect a lot of silly passion
inspired assertions which have little or no substance aside from personal belief.
An Afghan leader makes assertions which UK media denies - it's up to the consumer of the media to decide why they may or may not subscribe to the
...again, due to the childlike inability of some ATS members to distinguish between factual or belief based comments, I repeat, I do not support a
constitutional monarchy for the UK nor the UK's incursion into Afghanistan. - That is a debate for another thread though
edit on 2-1-2013 by
grainofsand because: (no reason given)
edit on 2-1-2013 by grainofsand because: (no reason given)