Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Sun and NASA Disninfo Exposed! Another force twisting Magnetic field

page: 1
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 11:14 AM
link   
I will start this thread by saying that I am no space weather expert. But while many feel that NASA is the our guiding light with space information, I have always felt that they have an agenda, just like all other Govt. agencies. This Youtuber "TheUntiedKnowledge" makes a compelling argument. His video is a bit dry, but it is worth wading thru.

Is there another Energy Source affecting Earth?? Who knows, But I know that our Great ATS'ers will hash it out.



YouTube Source
edit on 1-1-2013 by princeguy because: (no reason given)


He has supposedly found a pattern in earths magnetic disturbances. He goes on to say that this pattern is very easy to recognize. He has been able to predict "solar "disturbances" and they are documented on Youtube. His video was even scrutinized by NASA talking heads just before they took down the instrumentation that he was using to accurately predict these events. He claims that with research any one of us can find this pattern.

edit on 1-1-2013 by princeguy because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 11:30 AM
link   
reply to post by princeguy
 


Summary, please.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 11:57 AM
link   
Longest 35 minutes in my life...

But i'm interested in what someone night comment, someone who knows what the hell is this guy talking about



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 11:58 AM
link   
hE CLAIMS THAT THE SAME EVENTS ARE REPEATED OVER THREE YEARS TO THE DAY.....
Some have only repeated twice others three years running....
He is making predictions based on this evidence, and asumes that the SUN is NOT the cause of the solar disrurbances of late...that perhaps anopther spatial body is involved.....



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 11:59 AM
link   
reply to post by princeguy
 


while i watched the entire video i had to suppress my desire to keep from taking a nap. there is valid information shared here if you can stand the "dryness" if that is what you call it. the guy was flat out boring. he could've made the same points a lot quicker. cover up in effect. same information given by sources relating to solar activity in order to prevent people from seeing the truth. the sun is not causing these anomalies to occur. the inference being there is "something" else causing the magnetic changes around the poles. okay. got it. there is no proof yet but the recurring patterns do seem to support his theory.

not sure what can be done even if he is right. cause a mass panic? what would that do? we see how people behaved over 2012, how would they behave if they were told the truth about this?

thanks for the thread. anyone who chooses to watch it i recommend you shorten the viewing time by forwarding ten minutes at a time. you will still get the gist.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 12:00 PM
link   
reply to post by stirling
 


Nibiru...obviously.

2nd



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 12:09 PM
link   
And the evidence...a guy on youtube said so, how did I guess



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 12:47 PM
link   
i have to admit that im intrigued with the data presented..

also...i watched the whole 35 mins of the video which indicates it was interesting..youtube or not..

i suggest the wacth the video 1st before derailing the thread



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 12:50 PM
link   
He's talking about the same thing that has been discussed here many times and it's based on a complete lack of understanding about what the magnetosphere simulations show. He believes what he calls a "compressed" magnetic field has something to do with something other than solar activity. It has to do with very low solar activity and he fails to understand how the magnetic orientation of the solar wind affects the magnetosphere.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



edit on 1/1/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 12:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


This is what I thought too.

His "predictions" are coincidences, right? And in fact occur much more regularly than he's saying.

ETA: When I say coincidence, I mean hand picked events to appear they occur in and around the same time each year.


edit on 1/1/13 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 01:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


His "predictions" are coincidences, right? And in fact occur much more regularly than he's saying.
Yes. Shower syndrome at work.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 02:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
He's talking about the same thing that has been discussed here many times and it's based on a complete lack of understanding about what the magnetosphere simulations show. He believes what he calls a "compressed" magnetic field has something to do with something other than solar activity. It has to do with very low solar activity and he fails to understand how the magnetic orientation of the solar wind affects the magnetosphere.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



edit on 1/1/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)


I have never seen this theory discussed on here before.


How is it that he was able to predict these occurrences if it he lacks understanding?



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 02:31 PM
link   
reply to post by princeguy
 


I have never seen this theory discussed on here before.
Perhaps you haven't been here long enough. The "compressed" magnetic field has been discussed many times. He says the "compressed" magnetic field is due to some unidentified activity. It is not. It is due to very low density solar winds with a north turn.




How is it that he was able to predict these occurrences if it he lacks understanding?

His predictions are meaningless. It's like saying the wind will blow tomorrow. Does he list his failed predictions? No. Does he talk about events that he didn't "predict"? No. Does he understand what he is looking at? No.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 02:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Damnit Phage, do you have to debunk it so fast. Nibiru was only brought up one time. lol
2nd



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 03:27 PM
link   
Very interesting video. Thanks for posting it. Time will reveal all. It always does. Patterns are everywhere in nature. However nature is sometimes random. The animal die offs always worry me.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 05:02 PM
link   
As I have said in many other threads.
It is a black hole our Sun goes around.

The Barycentre of our solar system proves it. As the Barycentre is outside the middle of the Sun.

I copied a youtube vid three and half years ago, which showed a black hole in front of the Sun in Vanatu. Three years later I found another black hole in front of our Sun.

Everyone says it is a digital camera anomaly. I call BS.

It is also sending the high neutrons, gamma radiation and x-rays onto the earth. (This is the reason for the chemtrails; barium sulphate is a barrier to gamma and xrays.)
It isn't Nibiru you should be worried about, it is the new energy from nibiru feeding the black hole.

BTW The black hole has grown much bigger than three years ago.

This is the reason for the man-made catastrophe of Fukishma-everyone believes the excess of Iodine 131 is caused by Fukishma. It isn't, it is caused by Neutrons hitting the natural Tellurium in the soil that results in iodine 131.
But everyone is concentrating on the effects of fukishma, this is also why fukishima can't deal with the problem, they have been told not to. Can you see why?

If Phage debunks then pity him, as he either believes the lies of the science community or he is one of THEM.

I've known this for years and they have sent assassins and people cooked us, Yehovah keeps me safe, even though we are ill.

Believe me or not. I really don't mind but soon you will see the two jets from the black hole and three suns will be appearing in the sky.

Get a geiger counter and EM detedtors and check when it is safe to go out.
Gamma radiation is only safe under 6ft of soil and neutrons and 6ft of water so it will be safe on the bottom of the sea.

33 yrs anyone?



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 05:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


so this basically means you can predict the same way he did on lets say different dates..am i correct>?



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 06:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by princeguy
 





How is it that he was able to predict these occurrences if it he lacks understanding?

His predictions are meaningless. It's like saying the wind will blow tomorrow. Does he list his failed predictions? No. Does he talk about events that he didn't "predict"? No. Does he understand what he is looking at? No.




I dare say that you do not fully understand what you are looking at either sir. No one on gods green earth fully understands the events of our galaxy, and for you to so fervently toss this under the bus seems arrogant.

When there is a recognizable pattern it deserves attention.

Show us why his predictions and findings are lacking and then you will have my attention.
edit on 1-1-2013 by princeguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:25 PM
link   
The guy complains about someone saying that he doesn't understand how science works. The guy is actually right. Science has to know what causes a pattern before they can call it real. Just because something happens on or around a certain time each year doesn't mean that science can say it is real. I am sure that NASA is aware of this pattern but can't understand why so they can't acknowledge the pattern. Scientists must be a little jealous of people who can show these things while they cannot because of their rules. Maybe something will change because of the three scientists in Italy that downplayed the possibilities of quakes. Scientists cannot get people all panicky either. That could become a nightmare. I am sure that scientists could release something that says chances are greater of things happening at certain times without losing credibility though. If an earthquake risk increases than we can be more prepared at that time.
edit on 1-1-2013 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:30 PM
link   
reply to post by heineken
 

What exactly do you think he predicted? That there would be geomagnetic activity? Sure, I can predict that. Especially if you only pay attention to my predictions that are correct and ignore those that aren't. And ignore the ones I don't predict.
edit on 1/1/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)






top topics



 
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join